摘要
反担保制度是我国民事立法的一大创举,在商品贸易、工程承包和资金借贷方面发挥了重要作用。但是基于某些原因,学术界几乎无一例外地认为反担保与担保之间是种属关系。文章分析了这种认识现状,并分别从概念表述的准确性和二者的区别上进行了必要的考察,鲜明地指出反担保和担保不存在种属关系而是两项并列的制度,并且指出,如果承认反担保与担保之间存在种属关系,将会导致制度设立功能和使用方式上的逻辑悖论。
The system of the anti - guarantee is a great invention in civil legislations of China, it is very important when it applies to commodity trade, project contract and the loan. By some reasons, most of people in legal academy consider the guarantee and the anti - guarantee as the relation of category and predictability. This thesis analyzes the cognitive actuality, makes a necessary investigation into the differentiation and the conceptual expression between the guarantee and the anti -guarantee, points out the relation between the guarantee and anti - guarantee is not the relation of category and predictability but the two paratactic system, and if we admit that they are the relation of category and predictability, we will make logic mistakes on the functions of establishing system and the methods of application.
出处
《郑州航空工业管理学院学报（社会科学版）》
2006年第5期113-114,117,共3页
Journal of Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics(Social Science Edition)
关键词
担保
反担保
种属关系
并列关系
guarantee
anti - guarantee
relation of category and predictability
paratactic relation
