期刊文献+

经耻骨上前列腺切除术后罗哌卡因混合芬太尼病人自控硬膜外镇痛的效果 被引量:3

Efficacy of ropivacaine combined with fentanyl for patient-controlled epidural analgesia after suprapubic prostatectomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察不同浓度罗哌卡因混合芬太尼病人自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)用于经耻骨上前列腺切除术(SPP)后的效果。方法SPP病人36例,ASAⅡ或Ⅲ级,随机分为3组:0.12%罗哌卡因混合芬太尼PCEA组(RL组)、0.2%罗哌卡因混合芬太尼PCEA组(RH组)和吗啡病人自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)组(M组),每组12例。记录术后第6、24、48和72小时(T_6、T_(24)、T_(48)和T_(72))运动神经阻滞程度评分(Bromage评分);记录术后即刻~<6h、术后6~<24h、术后24~<48h和术后48~72h时段膀胱痉挛次数;采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)记录病人膀胱痉挛时和非痉挛时疼痛程度;记录有关的副作用及术后72h膀胱冲洗液内红细胞的总数。结果1.T_6时Bromage评分RL组和RH组高于M组(P<0.05或0.01),T_(24~72)时RH组高于RL组和M组(P<0.01),RL组与M组之间差异无统计学意义。2.膀胱痉挛次数在术后6h内三组差异无统计学意义,术后6~72h,RL组和RH组低于M组(P<0.05),其中术后6~<24 h RH组少于于RL组(P<0.05),术后24~<72h,RH组和RL组之间差异无统计学意义。3.在膀胱痉挛时,VAS评分RH组和RL组低于M组(P<0.05),H组与RL组差异无统计学意义;在非膀胱痉挛时,三组之间差异无统计学意义。4.RL组和RH组术后72h膀胱冲洗液内红细胞总数低于M组(P<0.01),RL组与RH组差异无统计学意义。结论与吗啡PCIA相比,SPP后使用0.12%或0.2%的罗哌卡因混合芬太尼进行PCEA,能更有效地减少膀胱痉挛,减少前列腺窝创面的出血量。SPP后不同时段采用不同浓度的罗哌卡因混合芬太尼进行PCEA,效果更好。 Objective To investigate the efficacy of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with ropivacaine plus fentanyl for postoperative analgesia after suprapubic prostatectomy (SPP) , Methods Thirty-six ASA Ⅱ or Ⅲ patients aged 62-78 yrs weighing 52-84 kg undergoing SPP were randomly divided into 3 groups with 12 patients in each group: group Ⅰ received PCEA with 0, 12% ropivacaine and fentanyl 1 μg·ml^-1 ; group Ⅱ received PCEA with 2% ropivacaine and fentanyl 1 μg·ml^-1 and group m received patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) with morphine 0.2 mg·ml^-1, Postoperative pain was assessed using VAS (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain), The degree of motor blockade (modified Bromage scale) was evaluated at 6, 24, 48 and 72 h after operation (T1-4), Bladder spasm episodes were recorded. Side effects including nausea, vomiting and pruritus and the total number of RBC in rinse solution were also recorded. Results ( 1 ) Bromage score (0 = no motor block, 3 = inability to flex ankle joint) was significantly higher in group Ⅰ and Ⅱ than in group Ⅲ at T1 (6 h after op. ) , but significantly lower in group Ⅰ and Ⅲ than in group Ⅱ at T2-4 (24-72 h after operation). (2) VAS score (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain) was not significantly different among the 3 groups without bladder spasm but significantly higher in group m than in other 2 groups during episodes of bladder spasm. (3) The number of bladder spasm episodes was not significantly different among the 3 groups within 6h after operation, but was significant larger in group m than in the other two groups during 6-72 h after operation. During 6-24 h after operation more bladder spasm attacks occurred in group Ⅰ than in group Ⅱ . (4) The incidence of side effects was significantly lower and the total number of RBC in rinse solution was significantly smaller in group Ⅰ and Ⅱ than in group Ⅲ Conclusion PCEA with 0.12% or 2% ropivacaine plus fentanyl can effectively reduce the number of bladder spasm attack and postoperative bladder bleeding. Different concentrations of repivacaine shotdd be used for PCEA during different postoperative periods.
出处 《中华麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第6期538-541,共4页 Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
关键词 酰胺类 前列腺切除术 镇痛 病人控制 镇痛 硬膜外 疼痛 手术后 mides Prostateetomy Analgesia, patient-controlled Analgesia, epidural Pain,postoperative
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Zink W, Graf BM. Benefit-risk assessment of ropivacaine in the management of postoperative pain. Drug Saf,2004,27 : 1093-1114.
  • 2Casati A, Santorsola R, Aldegheri G, et al. Intraoperative epidural anesthesia and postoperative analgesia with levobupivacaine for major orthopedic surger): a double-blind, randomized comparison of racemic bupivacaine and ropivacaine. J Clin Anesth, 2003,15: 126-131.
  • 3Klasen J, Haas M, Graf S, et al. Impact on postoperative pain of long-lasting pre-emptive epidural analgesia before total hip replacement: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Anaesthesia, 2005, 60:118-123.
  • 4朱波,徐建青,叶铁虎,任洪智,黄宇光,罗爱伦.腹式子宫切除术后甲磺酸罗哌卡因与盐酸罗哌卡因硬膜外病人自控镇痛的比较[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2005,25(8):572-575. 被引量:42
  • 5Volk T, Schenk M, Voigt K, et al. Postoperative epidural anesthesia preserves lymphocyte, but not monocyte, immune function after majorspine surgery. Anesth Analg,2004,98: 1086-1092.
  • 6吕艳霞 陈聚朝 陆萍.术后镇痛[A].孟庆云 柳顺锁 刘志双.神经阻滞学(第1版)[C].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003.1021-1056.

二级参考文献8

  • 1Kampe S, Kiencke P, Krombach J, et al. Current practice in postoperative epidural analgesia: a german survey. Anesth Analg, 2002, 95:1767-1769.
  • 2Macias A, Monedero P, Adame M, et al. A randomized, double-blinded comparison of thoracic epidural ropivacaine, ropivacaine/fentanyl, or bupivacaine/fentanyl for postthoracotomy analgesia. Anesth Analg, 2002,95:1344-1350.
  • 3Hubler M, Litz RJ, Sengebusch KH, et al. A comparison of five solutions of local anaesthetics and/or sufentanil for continuous, postoperative epidural analgesia after major urological surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol,2001,18:450-457.
  • 4Kampe S, Randebrock G, Kiencke P, et al. Comparison of continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine and sufentanil with intravenous patientcontrolled analgesia after total hip replacement. Anaesthesia, 2001, 56:1189-1193.
  • 5Pouzeratte Y, Delay JM, Brunat G, et al. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia after abdominal surgery: ropivacaine versus bupivacaine.Anesth Analg, 2001, 93:1587-1592.
  • 6Whiteside R, Jones D, Bignell S, et al. Epidural ropivacaine with fentanyl following major gynaecological surgery: the effect of volume and concentration on pain relief and motor impairment. Br J Anaesth, 2000,84: 720-724.
  • 7Senard M, Joris JL, Ledoux D, etal. Acomparison of 0.1% and 0.2% ropivacaine and bupivacaine combined with morphine for postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia after major abdominal surgery.Anesth Analg, 2002, 95:444-449.
  • 8Liu SS, Moore JM, Luo AM, et al. Comparison of three solutions of ropivacaine/fentanyl for postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia. Anesthesiology, 1999, 90:727-733.

共引文献42

同被引文献15

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部