期刊文献+

湘江干流水环境健康风险评价 被引量:84

Water environmental health risk assessment of Xiangjiang River
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 为研究湘江水环境污染对人体健康产生的危害风险,在简要介绍健康风险评价方法及国内外研究、应用进展的基础上,建立了水环境健康风险评价模式,应用2000年的水质监测资料,对湘江干流主要断面进行了水环境健康风险评价。结果表明,在所评价断面中,非致癌物质由饮水途径所致健康危害的个人年风险按大小排列为Pb>Hg>NH3>酚;化学致癌物质由饮水途径所致健康危害的个人年风险按大小排列为As>Cd;化学致癌物质对人体健康危害的个人年风险远超过非致癌物质;污染最为严重的为松柏断面,其次是五星断面和三叉矶断面。湘江干流衡阳以上江段水质良好,衡阳以下江段水质较差。研究对湘江干流水污染防治方略的制定具有一定价值。 The present paper introduces the author's research of the water environmental health risk assessment for the main reaches of Xiangjiang River, the most important river areas in Hunan province, based on the model for water environmental health risk analysis recommended by USEPA and the monitoring data in the year 2000, The result of the research shows that the greatest health risk to the individual person per year in terms of non-carcinogens through drinking is Pb, followed by Hg. And the greatest health risk for individual person per year in terms of carcinogens are As and Cd which are higher than the standard 5.0 × 10^-5 a^-1 recommended by ICRP. Thus it can be seen that the health risk for the individual person caused by chemical carcinogens is far greater than non-carcinogens, to which must be paid much greater attention. Another fact found from the experiment is that the water quality of Xiangjiang River above Fengxi in Zhuzhou proves better, but that of Xiangjiang River lower than Zhouzhu proves worse. The most heavily polluted section is Songbai section in Hengyang. Its greatest health risk to individual person per year can be ten times as high as the standard value recommended by ICRP, which are in the sections at Xiawan in Zhuzhou, Wuxing sec- tion in Xiangtan and Sanchaji section in Changsha, twice higher than the value recommended by ICRP. Thus, it can be seen that the reach of River Xiangjiang from Hengyang to Changsha are the key to the water pollution control and treatment of the whole River. The application experiment results show that the assessment models can both describe quantitatively and qualitatively the seriousness of the pollution on the public health and the risk of the entire social environment. Though the Environmental Health Risk Assessment (EHRA) is not required in the environmental assessment for the time being in China, it should be included in the environmental assessment. Therefore, the EHRA is a new assessment method.
出处 《安全与环境学报》 CAS CSCD 2006年第2期12-15,共4页 Journal of Safety and Environment
基金 湖南省软科学研究计划项目(04ZH3068) 湖南省教育厅科学研究项目(02C229) 湖南省重大水利科技项目(05SL04)
关键词 环境质量监测与评价 水环境 健康风险评价 模型 湘江 environmental quality monitoring and assessment water environment health risk assessment model Xiangjiang River
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1陈咏淑,吴甫成,吕焕哲,姚成胜.近20年来湘江水质变化分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2004,13(5):508-512. 被引量:56
  • 2U.S.National Research Council.Risk assessment in the federal government:managing the process[M].Washington,D.C.:National Academy Press,1983.
  • 3USEPA.The risk assessment guidelines of 1986[S].EPA Report no.EPA/600/18-87/045,Washington,D.C.
  • 4USEPA/540/186060.Superfund public health evaluation manual[S].EPA.
  • 5USEPA.Guidelines for exposure assessment[M].FRL-4129-5,1992:186.
  • 6毛小苓,刘阳生.国内外环境风险评价研究进展[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2003,11(3):266-273. 被引量:158
  • 7HU Erbang(胡二邦),PENG Litong(彭理通),LU Yongsen(陆雍森),et al.Operatwe technology and method in environmental assessment(环境风险评价实用技术和方法)[M].Beijing:China Environmental Science Press,2000.
  • 8Management Department of State Environmental Protection Administration of China(国家环保总局监督管理司).China environmental impact assessment:trainingtextbook(中国环境影响评价:培训教材)[M].Beijing:Chemical Industry Press,2000.
  • 9JOHN F.EC approach to environmental risk assessment of new substances[J].The Science of the Total Environment,1995,171(3):275-279.
  • 10ROLF F H.Outline on risk assessment programme of existing substance in the European Union[J].Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology,1996,2(2):93-96.

二级参考文献37

共引文献466

同被引文献822

引证文献84

二级引证文献1107

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部