期刊文献+

安Ⅱ^1青少年颞下颌关节盘-突-窝位置关系的MRI研究 被引量:6

TMJ disc-condyle-fossa relationship in adolescent patients with class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion A MRI study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究安Ⅱ^1错合青少年颞下颌关节(TMI)髁突在关节凹内的位置和盘-突关系以及髁突位置和盘突关系之间的相关关系,探讨安Ⅱ^1是否存在一定的TMJ病理结构。方法29例安Ⅱ^1错合青少年(男14例,女15例),平均年龄10.8±1.1岁(8.1—13.0岁);摄取58侧TMJ的磁共振(MRI)片,测量分析突)窝、盘一突关系,与正常值相比较,并对髁突位置与盘突关系进行相关分析。结果反映髁突位置的JSI,Ca-Ti值与正常值之间有显著差异(P〈0.05),显示髁突处于前移位;反映盘突关系的各测量值稍比正常值前位,但差异无显著性;髁突位置与盘突关系相关系数多在0.013-0.213之间;盘前移位组与盘正常组的髁突位置差异无显著性。结论安Ⅱ^1错合青少年髁突位置呈前移位,关节盘相对髁突偏前位但在正常生理范围内;未发现髁突位置与盘突关系之间存在相关关系。 Objective To examine the disc-condyle-fossa relationship in adolescent patients with class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion. Methods Bilateral sagittal oblique TMJ MRIs in closed mouth obtained from 29 class Ⅱ^1 patients(14 boys and 15 girls, mean age 10. 8±1.1 years) were in cluded. Measurements made on the MRIs were used to calculate means, minimum and maximum values. The values were compared with normative values. In addition, the correlation coefficients between condyle position and disc position values were calculated. Results Bilateral condyles were both positioned anteriorly (p〈 0. 05 ). The correlation coefficients between condyle position and disc position in the range of 0. 013-0. 213(except one variable). No significant difference between disc shift group and disc normal group was found. Conclusion In the TMJ of class Ⅱ^1 malocclusion adolescents, the condyle was positioned anteriorly and the disccondyle relationship was normal. There was no correlation between disc position and condyle position.
出处 《口腔正畸学》 2006年第1期30-33,共4页 Chinese Journal of Orthodontics
关键词 安Ⅱ^1 青少年 颞下颌关节 髁突位置 盘突关系 MRI Class Ⅱ division 1 adolescent TMJ Condyle position Disc position MRI
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Ueki K, Nakagawa K, Takatsuka S et al. Temporomandibular joint morphology and dise position in skeletal elasslIIpatients.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2000; 28(6) : 362-8.
  • 2Zhou D, Hu M, Liang D ed al. Relationship between fossa-condylar position, meniscus position, and morphologic chang in patients with class Iland Ⅲ malocclusion. Chin J Dent Res.1999;2(1) :45-9.
  • 3Silverstein R, Dunn S, Binder R, Maganzini A. MRI assessment of the normal temporomandibular joint with the use of projective geometry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol.1994 ; 77 : 523-530.
  • 4Sabine Ruf, Britt Wusten, Hans Pancherz.Temporomandibular joint effects of Activator treatment: A prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging and clinical study. Angle Orthod. 2002;72:527-539.
  • 5Pullinger AG, Solberg WK, hollender L, Petersson A.Relationship of mandibialar condylar position to dental occlusion factors in an asymptomatic population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987;91:200-206.
  • 6Cohlmia JT. Tomographie assessment of temporomandibular joints in patients with malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1996; 66:27-35.
  • 7Solberg WK, Bibb CA, Nordstrom, bb et al. Malocclusion associated with temporomandibular joint changes in young adults at autopsy. Am J Orthod. 1986;89(4):326-30
  • 8Drace J E, Enzmann DR. Defining the normal temporomandibular joint: clised, partially open, and open mouth MR imaging of asymptomatic subjects. Radiology1990;22:205-207
  • 9Mavreas D, Athanasiou AE. Tomographic assessment of alterations of the temporomandibular joint after orthognathic surgery. EurJ Orthod. 1992; 14:3-15.
  • 10Bumann A, Vargas-pereira MR. Metric TMJ analysis for standardized evaluation of magnetic resonance images, abstract No. 1791. J Dent Res. 1997;76:237.

二级参考文献2

  • 1赵燕平,中华口腔医学杂志,1993年,28卷,70页
  • 2张震康,中华医学杂志,1975年,55卷,130页

共引文献22

同被引文献57

引证文献6

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部