期刊文献+

Evaluation of immunogenicity and reactogenicity of recombinant DNA hepatitis B vaccine produced in India 被引量:3

Evaluation of immunogenicity and reactogenicity of recombinant DNA hepatitis B vaccine produced in India
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: (1) To gain information on immune responses to an accelerated schedule of 0, 1, and 2 mo in paramedical staff and BDS students who are at an increased risk of getting hepatitis B infection and come under high risk groups. (2) To assess the efficacy and safety of En/vac- HB in different age groups, using genetically modified yeast strain Pichia pastoris, a new recombinant hepatitis B accine developed and manufactured in India. METHODS: A prospective, comparative, and single blinded trial of rapid (0, 1, and 2 mo) hepatitis B immunization schedulewas reported. A total of three hundred and seven (212 females and 95 males) healthy volunteers divided into three age groups (18-29, 30-39, and 40-49) were enrolled after screening for markers of hepatitis B. All the volunteers received 20 mg of the vaccine intramuscularly at 0, 1, and 2 mo. RESULTS: Geometric mean titers were calculated pre and post vaccination. Before immunization the GMT was 0.0124 mIU/mL. One month after the administration of the third dose of recombinant vaccine 296/307 (96.5%) subjects achieved seroprotective levels of anti-HBs. The geometric mean anti-HBs titers achieved after one month of the third dose was 2 560.0 mIU/mL. The geometric mean anti-HBs titer of males was 2 029.0 mIU/mL, while that of the females was 2 759.0 mIU/mL. In the age group of 18-29 years, anti-HBs titer was 3 025.0 mIU/ mL, while that in the age group of 30-39 years was 2 096.0 mlU/mL. In third age group of 40-49 years, anti- HBs titer was 1 592.0 mIU/mL. Hyper-responses (anti-HBs≥100 mIU/mL) were shown in 88.0% (271/307) of subjects. Eleven (3.5%) subjects responded poorly to the vaccine in the age group of 40-49 years. There was only mild pain at the site of injection otherwise there were no other adverse drug reactions (ADRs). CONCLUSION: This vaccine (Enivac-HB) is safe and efficacious, providing significant protection after the third dose and rapid hepatitis B immunization schedule of 0, 1, and 2 mo can be recommended whenever rapid protection is the goal. AIM: (1) To gain information on immune responses to an accelerated schedule of 0, 1, and 2 mo in paramedical staff and BDS students who are at an increased risk of getting hepatitis B infection and come under high risk groups. (2) To assess the efficacy and safety of EnivacHB in different age groups, using genetically modified yeast strain Pichia pastoris, a new recombinant hepatitis B vaccine developed and manufactured in India.METHODS: A prospective, comparative, and single blinded trial of rapid (0, 1, and 2 mo) hepatitis B immunization schedulewas reported. A total of three hundred and seven (212 females and 95 males) healthy volunteers divided into three age groups (18-29, 30-39,and 40-49) were enrolled after screening for markers of hepatitis B. All the volunteers received 20 mg of the vaccine intramuscularly at 0, 1, and 2 mo.RESULTS: Geometric mean titers were calculated pre and post vaccination. Before immunization the GMT was 0.0124 mIU/mL. One month after the administration of the third dose of recombinant vaccine 296/307 (96.5%)subjects achieved seroprotective levels of anti-HBs. The geometric mean anti-HBs titers achieved after one month of the third dose was 2 560.0 mIU/mL. The geometric mean anti-HBs titer of males was 2 029.0 mIU/mL, while that of the females was 2 759.0 mIU/mL. In the age group of 18-29 years, anti-HBs titer was 3 025.0 mIU/mL, while that in the age group of 30-39 years was 2096.0 mIU/mL. In third age group of 40-49 years, antiHBs titer was 1 592.0 mIU/mL. Hyper-responses (antiHBs≥100 mIU/mL) were shown in 88.0% (271/307) of subjects. Eleven (3.5%) subjects responded poorly to the vaccine in the age group of 40-49 years. There was only mild pain at the site of injection otherwise there were no other adverse drug reactions (ADRs).CONCLUSION: This vaccine (Enivac-HB) is safe and efficacious, providing significant protection after the third dose and rapid hepatitis B immunization schedule of 0, 1, and 2 mo can be recommended whenever rapid protection is the goal.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2005年第45期7165-7168,共4页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
基金 Supported by the Panacea Biotec Limited, New Delhi 110044,India
关键词 Enivac-HB Pichia pastoris Anti-HBsantibody Hepatitis B vaccine 免疫原性 重组体 乙型肝炎病毒 病理机制
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献25

  • 1[1]Thyagarajan SP, Jayaram S, Mohanavalli B. Prevelance of HBV in the general population of India. In: Sarin SK, Singal AK (eds).Hepatitis B in India: Problems and prevention. CBS publishers,New Delhi, India 1996:5-15
  • 2[2]John TJ, Abraham P. Hepatitis B in India: A review of disease epidemiology. Indian Pediatr 2001; 38:1318-1325
  • 3[3]Chen CJ, You SL, Lin LH, Hsu WL, Yang YW. Cancer Epidemiology and control in Taiwan: a brief review. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2002; 32 (Suppl): S66-81
  • 4[4]Arslanoglu Ⅰ, Cetin B, Isguven P, Karavus M. Anti-HBs response to Standard Hepatitis B vaccination in children and adolescents with diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2002; 15:389-395
  • 5[5]Cook IF, Murtagh J. Comparative immunogenicity of hepatitis B vaccine administered into the ventrogluteal area and anterolateral thigh in infants. J Paediatr Child Health 2002; 38:393-396
  • 6[6]Abraham B, Baine Y, De-Clercq N, Tordeur E, Gerard PP,Manovriez PL, Parenti DL. Magnitude and quality of antibody response to a combination hepatitis A and hepatitis B vaccine.Antiviral Res 2002; 53:63-73
  • 7[7]Cassidy WM. Adolescent hepatitis B vaccination. A review.Minerva Pediatr 2001; 53:559-566
  • 8[8]Elkayam O, Yaron M, Caspi D. Safety and efficacy of vaccination against hepatitis B in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2002; 61:623-625
  • 9[9]Leroux-Roels G, Cao T, De Knibber A, Meuleman P, Roobrouck A, Farhoudi A, Vanlandschoot P, Desombere I. Prevention of hepatitis B infections: vaccination and its limitations. Acta Clin Belg 2001; 56:209-219
  • 10[10]National Health and Medical Research Council. The Australian Immunization Handbook. Australian Government publication Service (AGPS). Canberra 2000

共引文献11

同被引文献23

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部