期刊文献+

民事诉讼收费制度改革的理念及路径 被引量:8

The Reformation Idea and Path of the Charge System of Civil Litigation
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 民事诉讼收费的合理性在一定程度上反映着一个国家的人民享受法律保障的程度。但我国自开始实行诉讼收费制度以来,所有有关诉讼收费的规范均由最高人民法院制定,在我国目前各级财政尚不能全额支付法院全部所需费用的情况下,法院本身与诉讼收费有着直接的利益关系,诉讼收费成为支撑审判成本的主要来源。这种制度安排不但使当事人承担了高额的诉讼成本,而且可能直接阻却当事人行使诉权。因此,诉讼收费制度的改革势在必行。我国应当理性地确定国家和当事人各自应承担的审判成本,并应将诉讼收费制度纳入民事诉讼法的调整范畴。 The charge of civil litigation is a reflection that how the people be protected. In our country, all the regulations on the charge are made by the Supreme People' s Court, and our government finance can' t afford the whole fees that the court system's need, the court system itself has direct interest in litigation charge, the charge became the main source which afford the judicial cost. All these make parties bear the great amount of lawsuit cost, and it may hinder parties to carry out litigation. So, reforming the charge system of civil procedure is imperative. We should confirm the judicial cost that the country and party should bear each reasonably, and the charge system should be embraced by civil procedural law.
作者 张榕
机构地区 厦门大学法学院
出处 《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第1期138-148,共11页 Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词 民事诉讼收费 改革 审判成本 民事诉讼法 中国 charge of civil litigation, guaranteeing of the parties' right of action, judicial cost
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

二级参考文献140

共引文献1213

同被引文献77

引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部