摘要
目的:比较野生与栽培甘草的质量。方法:采用高效液相色谱法,分光光度法及重量法,通过测定甘草中活性成分甘草酸含量、甘草总黄酮含量与浸膏量等,对两者作比较。结果:野生甘草与栽培甘草的内在质量无明显差异,而且均达到了《中国药典》规定的标准。结论:栽培甘草可替代野生甘草,解决野生甘草资源不足的问题。
Objective： To compare the quality of wild glycyrrhiza uralensis and plant glycyrrhiza uralensis. Method ： The content of glycyrrhizie acid, total content of flavone and extract weight in wild and plant glycyrrhiza uralensis were determined by HPLC, spectrophotometry and gravimetric method. Result： There was no significant difference in the quality of the wild and plant glycyrrhiza uralensi. Both had complied with the standard of pharmacopoeia. Conclusion： To Substitute plant glycyrrhiza uralensis for wild glycyrrhiza uralensis, so the problem that wild glycyrrhiza uralensis resources are insufficient can be solved.
出处
《中国药师》
CAS
2005年第10期819-821,共3页
China Pharmacist
关键词
野生甘草
栽培甘草
甘草酸
Wild glycyrrhiza uralensis
Plant glycyrrhiza uralensis
Glycyrrhizie acid
