期刊文献+

关于磁强计与磁力矩器分时工作方案的研究 被引量:5

Research on Time-sharing Scheme for Magnetometer and Magnetorquer
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 鉴于磁力矩器与磁强计同时工作会对磁强计地磁测量精度产生很大影响,本文提出一个磁强计与磁力矩器分时工作的方案,然后比较了卫星姿控系统采用不分时/分时两种方案的差异,最后研究了不同分时比例对卫星姿态控制的影响。通过仿真发现:当姿控系统采用分时方案时,电能消耗较少,早期阶段的控制精度较高,而后期稳态阶段的控制精度则相对较低;随着磁力矩器占用时间比例的下降,卫星姿态控制精度呈抛物线下降,卫星进入稳态控制阶段的时间也大大延长;分时比例存在一个相当大的范围,当在此范围内变化时,卫星姿态控制精度较高且变化幅值不大。此外,研究结果也反映出PD控制律良好的控制能力和鲁棒性。 The magnetorquer used on active magnetic control small satellite would strongly disturb the geomagnetic field measurement of the magnetometer when tbey both were working. This paper proposed a simple time-sharing control scheme where the magnetometer and the magnetorquer worked in turn according to a certain time-sharing ratio. In this paper the performance of the attitude control system using the new timesharing scheme is compared with that of the attitude control system using the non-time-sharing scheme. A study on how the time-sharing ratio influences the three-axis attitude control accuracy of the satellite is done. As shown in the simulations, the time-sharing scheme consumes much less power and achieves much higher accuracy of attitude control during the early phase than the non-time-sharing scheme, whereas the latter can achieve relatively lower steady-state control accuracy during the later phase. Furthermore, as the time ratio shared by the magnetorquer decreases, the attitude control accuracy takes on a parabolic decreasing trend and the satellite needs a much longer time to get into stabilization. There exists a considerable range for the time-sharing ratio, in which the attitude control accuracy of the satellite that is obtained in the case of different ratio does not change dramatically. In addition, the results also show the distinct controllability and robustness of the PD control law.
作者 黄琳 荆武兴
机构地区 哈尔滨工业大学
出处 《航天控制》 CSCD 北大核心 2005年第5期37-41,共5页 Aerospace Control
关键词 磁强计 磁力矩器 分时 姿态控制 近地小卫星 Magnetometer Magnetorquer Time-sharing Attitude control Near-Earth small satellite
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献6

  • 1Kim B J, Lee H and Choi S D. Three-axis reaction wheel attitude control system for KITSAT-3 micro-satellite [J]. Space Technology, 1996, 16(5):291-296
  • 2Michele C. Attitude determination and control for a small remote sensing satellite [J]. Acta Astronautica, 1997,40(9):675-681
  • 3Jon S J, Martin S and Stephen H M. UoSAT and other European activities in small satellite attitude control [J]. Advances in the Astronautical Science, 1994,86(2):359-370
  • 4Zimbelman, Wilmot D J and Evangelista S. The attitude control system design for the transition region and coronal explorer mission [A]. Processings of the 10th Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites [C], Logan, Utah, 1996,1-23
  • 5Roberto A, Pablo A and Ricardo S P. SAC-A attitude control design [J]. Advances in the Astronautical Science, 1998,100(1):99-110
  • 6Arduini C and Baiocco P. Active magnetic damping attitude control for gravity gradient stabilized spacecraft [J]. Journal of Guidance, Control,and Dynamics,1997,20(1):117-122

共引文献6

同被引文献49

引证文献5

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部