摘要
“问题与主义”之争触及的一个时代关注的焦点,就是中国社会改造是局部解决还是整体解决这一问题。其所涉及的面相比既存研究所论述者更为宽广,当时倾向于整体或根本解决中国问题的人相当普遍,其中不少人并不那么激进,甚至还有反马克思主义者。对于相当一部分人而言,整体或局部解决两种取向未必势不两立,反可能是一种互补的关系;且“根本解决”也不一定意味着革命,而革命倒可能是走向根本改造的第一步。
The“issues vs. isms”debate during the May Fourth period involved a vital issue of the times: should Chinese society be changed little by little, or once as a whole? The debate had some aspects that are not reflected in existing studies. At the time, the protagonists of a wholesale or fundamental approach were numerous, but many of them were not radical, and some of them were against Marxism. To many, the wholesale and the piecemeal approaches did not contradict each other; rather, they were mutually supplementary. And a“fundamental solution”did not necessarily mean a revolution, although revolution could be a first step toward a fundamental transformation.
出处
《历史研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第5期100-116,共17页
Historical Research
