期刊文献+

剖宫产切口感染的高危因素分析 被引量:33

Study of high-risk factors of surgical site infection after cesarean section
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨剖宫产切口感染的高危因素,为其寻找最佳的预防措施和方法。方法采用回顾性调查方法,调查术后切口感染的产妇以及可能与感染相关的危险因素。结果在21个影响因素中,经产妇、肥胖、胎膜早破、住院时间和手术时间过长等14项为高危因素(P<0.01)。ASA评分,妊娠合并症等7项统计学无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论剖宫产切口感染的高危因素依次为:肥胖,入院前感染,胎膜早破,术前血色素偏低,手术时间过长,术前未使用预防性抗生素,入院后过多的阴检、肛查。进行判别分类显示,当过多的阴检、肛查存在时,感染预测率为75.2%,逐步加入下列因素,其感染预测率分别为:术前未使用预防性抗生素75.2%,术前血色素偏低82.4%,手术时间过长81.7%,肥胖86.3%,胎膜早破83.7%,入院前感染的存在为84.9%。 Objective To study the high-risk factors of surgical site infection after cesarean section. Methods We retrospectively reviewed cesarean section cases with surgical site infection and evaluated the high-risk factors related to the infection. Results and Conclusions Totally 14 factors were identified as the high-risk factors such as obesity, inadequate antibiotic prophylaxis, low ferrohemoglobin level, existing infection before hospitalization, multiple vaginal and anal examinations, premature rupture of membranes, and prolonged operative time. The 7 factors such as emergency operation were not shown to be significant high-risk factors. The probability of parturient with frequently vaginal examination to acquire infection following cesarean section was 75.2%, which was judged by classification analysis. A stepwise addition of the factors for analysis showed some difference in the predicted probability, which was 75.2% for inadequate antibiotic prophylaxis, 82.4% for low ferrohemoglo-bin level, 81.7% for prolonged operative time, 86.3% for obesity, 83.7% for premature rupture of the membranes, and 84.9% for existing infection before hospitalization.
作者 周明 陈莉
出处 《第一军医大学学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2005年第8期1075-1078,共4页 Journal of First Military Medical University
关键词 剖宫产 切口感染 肥胖 胎膜早破 感染预测率 cesarean section surgical-site infection obesity membranes premature rupture infection, probability predicted
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Normand MC, Damato EG. Postcesarean infection [J]. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs, 2001, 30(6): 642-8.
  • 2Marsden W. Choosing caesarean section[J]. Lancet, 2000, 356(9242):1677-80.
  • 3Guaschino S, De Santo D, De Seta F. New perspectives in antibiotic prophylaxis for obstetric and gynaecological surgery [J]. J Hosp Infect, 2002, 50(Suppl A): S13-6.
  • 4Chelmow D, Ruehli MS, Huang E. Prophylactic use of antibiotics for nonlaboring patients undergoing cesarean delivery with intact membranes: a meta-analysis [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2001, 184(4): 656-61.
  • 5Myles TD, Gooch J, Santolaya J. Obesity as an independent risk factor for infectious morbidity in patients who undergo cesarean delivery[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2002, 100(5 Pt 1): 959-64.
  • 6Liabsuetrakul T, Lumbiganon P, Chongsuvivatwong V, et al. Current status of prophylactic use of antimicrobial agents for cesarean section in Thailand[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2002, 28(5): 262-8.
  • 7Liabsuetrakul T, Lumbiganon P, Chongsuvivatwong V. Prophylactic antibiotic prescription for cesarean section [J]. Int J Qual Health Care, 2002, 14(6): 503-8.
  • 8Killian CA, Graffunder EM, Vinciguerra TJ, et al. Risk factors for surgical-site infections following cesarean section [J]. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 2001, 22: 613-7.
  • 9Tully L, Gates S, Brocklehurst P, et al. Surgical techniques used during caesarean section operations: results of a national survey of practice in the UK[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2002, 102(2): 120-6.

同被引文献203

引证文献33

二级引证文献261

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部