期刊文献+

唐氏综合征产前诊断策略的费用-效果评价 被引量:3

Cost-effectiveness evaluation of the strategies for prenatal diagnosis of Down's syndrome
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评估我国唐氏综合征产前诊断3种策略的经济学效果。方法采用决策树模型, 对3种策略的费用-效果进行决策分析。结果与不作任何干预的策略相比,仅对35岁以上高风险群体直接作诊断的策略、孕中期筛查后对阳性者作诊断的策略能达到每万名孕妇分别确诊0.93例和1.47例病例,但可能因诊断程序导致正常胎儿流产分别为1.58例和0.82例,每诊断出1例病例的费用分别是108890.98元和443683.11元。结论综合考虑经济效果和安全性因素,孕中期两联筛查后对阳性者作进一步诊断的策略应是优选的策略。 Objective To evaluate the economic effectiveness of three strategies of prenatal diagnosis of Down's syndrome (DS) in China. Methods A decision tree model was used to make a decision analysis on the costeffectiveness of the three strategies. Results As compared with the first strategy of making no interventions, the second strategy of providing direct prenatal diagnosis to high-risk groups(persons aged>35) and the third strategy of providing diagnosis to those tested positive at screenings in mid-term pregnancy could, respectively, lead to the diagnosis of 0.93 and 1.47 cases of DS per 10 thousand pregnant women, but they could also induce, respectively, 1.58 and 0.28 cases of miscarriage of normal fetuses due to diagnosis procedures. The costs of one DS diagnosis were, respectively, 108890.98 yuan and 443683.11 yuan. Conclusion Taking into consideration both cost-effectiveness and safety factors, priority ought to be given to the third strategy.
出处 《中华医院管理杂志》 北大核心 2005年第7期458-461,共4页 Chinese Journal of Hospital Administration
基金 卫生部基金(编号:卫生部基妇发[2003]342号)
关键词 唐氏综合征 产前诊断 费用-效果评价 羊膜腔穿刺 诊断技术 Down's syndrome Cost-effectiveness Evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

二级参考文献64

  • 1陈立泉,张玲娟.北京市东城区疾病监测点1982年与1991年新生儿出生体重比较[J].疾病监测,1993,8(9):237-238. 被引量:1
  • 2高尔生,邓新清,何更生,方可娟,唐威,楼超华.中国已婚育龄妇女自然流产率分析[J].生殖与避孕,1993,13(5):358-366. 被引量:20
  • 3翁霞云.正确掌握剖宫产术指征[J].中华妇产科杂志,1994,29(8):502-504. 被引量:32
  • 4王德智,顾美皎.全国降低剖宫产率及妇科急症处理学术研讨会纪要[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,1995,11(2):120-122. 被引量:28
  • 5[1]Kline J. An epidemiological review of the role gravidity in spontaneous abortion[J]. Early Hum Dev, 1978, 1/4:337 - 344.
  • 6[2]Naylor AF, Warbrution D. Sequential analysis of spontaneous abor tion. Ⅱ . Collaborative study data show that gravidity determines a very substantial rise in risk[J ]. Fertil Steril, 1979, 31:282 - 286.
  • 7[3]Hebert CC, Bouyer J, Collin D, et al. Spontaneous abortion and in terpregnancy jinterval [ J ]. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol, 1986, 22:125 - 132.
  • 8[4]Harvey A, Risch, et al. Risk factors for spontaneous abortion and its recurrence[J]. Am J Epi, 1988, Vo1128(2) :420 - 429.
  • 9[5]Jens Modving, et al. Measurement of total risk of spontaneous sbor tion:The virtue of conditional risk estimation[J]. Am J Epi, 1990,Vol 132(6): 1021 - 1037.
  • 10[7]Tan NH, et al. Sociobiolojgical risk factors for spontaneous abortion in malaysia[J] .J Obstet Gynaeeol, 1995, 21(4) :313 - 318.

共引文献166

同被引文献20

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部