期刊文献+

循证指导下的心肌损害标志物与临床决策 被引量:1

Evidence based cardiac markers and decision-making
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 对心肌肌酸激酶同工酶MB(CK MB)、肌红蛋白、心肌肌钙蛋白T(cTnT)和心肌肌钙蛋白I(cTnT)用于诊断心肌梗死(MI)和对急性冠状动脉综合征分级的系统评价结果表明,在症状发生后的12~48小时采样分析,CK MB质量诊断MI的临床灵敏度和特异性分别是98.8%和89.6%。肌红蛋白有高的阴性预示值,在症状发生后的2~6小时采样分析,有高的临床灵敏度。在症状发生后的12小时采样分析cTnI,诊断MI可达到最佳临床灵敏度,临床灵敏度和特异性分别是90%和97%。在症状发生后的12小时采样分析cTnT,诊断MI的临床灵敏度和特异性分别是98.2%和8.8%,临床特异性降低与检测到微小心肌受损有关。cTnT和cTnI比CK MB预测急性冠状动脉综合征危险性更有用。 There is systematic review evidence for use CK-MB,myoglobin,cardiac troponin T(cTnT) and cardiac troponin I(cTnI) for diagnosis of mycardial infarction(MI)and riskstratification of the acute coronary syndromes.CK-MB mass for diagnosis of MI yieldded a clinical sensitivity and specificity are 98.8% and 89.6% respectively for sampling at 12~48 hours.Myoglobin has high negative predictive value and high sensitivity 2~6hours after presentation.Clinical sensitivity and specifictiy of cTnI are 90%and 97% respectively for sampling over 12hours after symptoms onset.cTnT had a sensitivity of 98.2% for diagnosis of MI with lower specificity due to detection of minor myocardial injury.Both cTnT and cTnI are more useful for stratifying risk in acute coronary syndrome patients than CK-MB.
出处 《广州医药》 2005年第2期3-5,共3页 Guangzhou Medical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1潘柏申.美国临床生化科学院关于冠心病时心肌标志物的应用建议[J].上海医学检验杂志,2000,15(1):5-7. 被引量:40
  • 2杨振华,潘柏申,许俊堂.中华医学会检验学会文件心肌损伤标志物的应用准则[J].中华检验医学杂志,2002,25(3):185-189. 被引量:402
  • 3潘柏申.心肌损伤标志物的研究进展与心肌梗死诊断标准的修订[J].临床检验杂志,2002,20(3):129-132. 被引量:139
  • 4Wu AHB, Lane PL Metaanalysis in clinical chemistry: validation of cardiac troponm T as a marker for ischernic heart diseases. Clin Chem, 1995, 11: 1228-1233.
  • 5Ingwall JS, Kramer MF, Fifer MA, et al. The creatine kinase system in normal and diseased human myocardium. Nengl J Med, 1985, 313: 1050-1054.
  • 6De Winter R J, Koster RW, Sturk A, et al. Value of myoglobin, troponin Tand CK-MB mass in ruling out myocardial infarction in the emergency room. Circulation, 1995, 92:3401-3407.
  • 7De Beh, Package Insert. Stratus cardiac troponi-I fluorometric enzyme immunoassay-Copyright. Clin Chem, 1998,46: 216-246.
  • 8Hamm CW, Heeschen C, Goldmann BU, et al. Value of troponins in predicting therapeutic efficacy of Abciximab in patients with unstableangina. Abstract J Am Coil Cardiol,1998, 31: 185A.
  • 9Antman EM, Tanasijevic M J, Thompson B, et al. Cardiacspecific troponin-I levels to predict the risk of mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med,1996, 335: 1342-1381.
  • 10Ohnam EM, Armstrong PW, Christenson RH, et al. Risk stratification with admission cardiac troponin T levels in acute myocardial ischemia. N Engl J Med, 1996, 335:1333-1341.

二级参考文献48

  • 1[1]Wu A H B. Biochemical markers of cardiac damage: from traditional enzymes to cardiac-specific proteins[J]. Scand J Clin Lab Invest,1999,59(Suppl 230): 74-82.
  • 2[2]Panteghni M, Apple F S, Christenson R H, et al. Proposal from IFCC committee on Standadization of Markers of Cardiac Damage (C-SMCD): recommendation on use of biochemical markers of cardiac damage in acute coronary syndromes [J]. Scand J Clin Lab Invest, 1999,59(Suppl 230): 103-112.
  • 3[3]Wu A H,Apple F S ,Gibler W B, et al. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Standards of Laboratory Practice: recommendations for the use of cardiac markers in coronary artery disease[J]. Clin Chem,1999,45: 1104-1121.
  • 4[4]Alpert J S, Thygesen K, Antman E, et al. Myocardial infarction redefined:a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000,36: 959-969.
  • 5[5]Giri S,Waters D D,Wu A H B. Pathophysiology of acute coronary syndromes In: Card iac markers. Ed. Wu A H B. New Jersey:Humana Press Inc, 1998.21-44.
  • 6[6]Winter R J, Fischer J, Bholasingh R, et al. C-reactive protein and cardiac troponin T in risk stratification:differences in optimal timing of tests early after the onset of chest pain[J]. Clin Chem,2000,46:1597-1603.
  • 7[7]Koenig W, Sund M, Frohlich M, et al. C-reactive protein, a sensitive marker of inflammation, predicts future risk of coronary, heart disease in initial healthy middle-aged men: results from the MONICA Augsburg Cohort Study, 1984 to 1992 [J]. Circulation, 1999, 99:237-242.
  • 8[8]Zimmerman J, Fromm R, Meyer D, et al. Diagnostic marker cooperative study for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction [J].Circulation, 1999,99: 1671-1677.
  • 9[9]Roberts W T, Sedrick R, Moulton L, et al. Evaluation of four automated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein methxts: implications for clinical and epidemiological applications[J]. Clin Chem, 2000,46:461-468.
  • 10[10]Rifai N, Ridker P M. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein: a novel and promising marker of coronary heart disease [J]. Clin Chem,2001,47: 403-411.

共引文献562

同被引文献31

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部