摘要
文章从概括性时代范围不全面,划分不科学;有悖《中图法》第四版的复分规定;不符合加“0”规则3个方面,对张玉辉同志提出的主张与举措进行了探讨。
This article discusses the opiniones and moves in comrade Zhang Yuhui’s article from three aspects that generality period scope is not overall and division is unscientific;Contrary to Classification regulations in the Chinese Library Classification of the 4th edition;Not in accord with the rule of adding“0”。
出处
《图书馆学研究》
2005年第4期59-61,共3页
Research on Library Science
关键词
类目复分
《中图法》第四版
加“0”规则
科学
概括性
举措
文章
规定
范围
划分
Chinese Library Classification(the 4th edition) chinese subdivisions of period class subdivision period subdivision systematic indexing
