“个性化”的有限责任公司——评《中国公司法修改草案建议稿》相关问题被引量：6

“ Personalized” Limited- Liability Companies——Comments on the Draft of the Companies Act of PRC

下载PDF

导出

摘要《中国公司法修改草案建议稿》基本实现了提高公司法的可操作性以及尊重公司章程自治两大目标,但在有限责任公司规定方面,仍存在改进空间。草案应取消股东最高人数限制、完善股权继承异议制、禁止以尚未履行的劳务作为出资、承认书面及电子表决方式,并在明确区分大小公司的基础上构造监事制、职工董事制,并赋予章程自身塑造董事会与股东会权限关系的自由。 General speaking, the Proposed Revision Draft of the Companies Act of the PRC has achieved its two aims, i.e. to make the Companies Act more easily applicable and to emphasize the autonomy of companies. However, there is still much room for us to amend the provisions concerning the limited- liability companies. To illustrate, no minimum number of shareholders shall be provided in the Draft. Ways to make objections to the succession of shares ought to be smoothed. Unperformed labor shall not be valid contribution to the capital of companies. Written or electronic votes should be accepted. The supervisors, and the representatives of employees in the board of directors should be ascertained based on the classification of big and small companies. And a company shall be entitled, by its articles of association and by- laws, to prescribe its board of directors and general meetings of shareholders according to its own judgment or choice.

作者吴越

机构地区西南政法大学

出处《现代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第1期69-75,共7页 Modern Law Science

基金西南政法大学欧盟法律研究所2004-2005年度中国欧盟法律和司法合作项目"欧盟法翻译研究与培训行动"(项目合同号PMO/DF/02/006)的成果之一

关键词草案有限责任公司公司法表决方式职工董事承认修改中国公司小公司董事会 Companies Act limited- liability companies draft

分类号 D92 [政治法律—法学] F279 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献29

1张毅,邱鹭风.论上市公司股东大会表决方式的不足及完善[J].现代管理科学,2004(2):24-25. 被引量：3
2吴越.中国公司法之构造缺陷及克服[J].现代法学,2003,25(2):119-127. 被引量：22
3[台]林国全.台湾地区有限公司法制之探讨与应有之修正方向[M].王保树.全球竞争体制下的公司法改革[C].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2003.445-484.
4赵旭东.公司法学[C].北京:高等教育出版社,2004.208-212.
5吴越.有限责任公司法的改革.意大利与中国的比较[M].www.swupl.edu.cn/oumeng/content.aspdid,2004—11—20.
6Boucourechliev/Hommelhoff, Vorschlaege fuer eine Europaeische Privatgesellschaft, Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt, 1999, SS 250 -255,105.
7Hueck/Windbichler, Gesellschaftsrecht, 20. Aufl, C H Beck, 2003, S 499.
8Butterworths Company Law Handbook, 18th ed, LexisNexis, Butterworth, 2004, pp 3023 - 3058.
9EU Company Law of 28 States, 2nd ed. DJF Publishing,2003. p 319.
10Pennington, Company Law, 8th Ed.Butterworth, 2001. p 942.

二级参考文献10

1Philip Blumberg, The Law d Corporate Croups [M], Bd 1, Substantive Law, USA, Little & Brown ~mveny, 1987.
2Philip Blumberg, The Law d Corporate Croups, Bd 1, Substantive Law,2000 Supplement [M]. USA, Aspen Law and Business. 2000.
3Marcus Lutter, Limited Liability Companies and Private Commies,[M], J.C.B Mohr, Germany, 1998, p.6.
4Eiji, Takahashi, Konzexn und Untemdunensgmppe in Japan[R],Diss., Germany, 1994, S. 40.
5Emmerich/Sonnenschein/Habersack, Konzemrecht[M], Beck, 7.Aufl., Germany, 2001, S. 3.
6R.W. Hamilton, the Law of Corporations[M], 4th Ed., West Group, USA, 1996, p. 286.
7F. Kubler,Gesellschaftarecht[M], 5. Aufl., Germany,1999, S.29ff.
8K. Schmidt, Gesellschaftsrechtrecht [ M ], Germany, 1999, S.122.
9R. Altmeppen, Abschied von qualifiziert faktischen Konzern [M],Germany, 1991, S. 120.
10Robert R. Pennington, Pennington' s Company Law EM], 8th Ed., Butterworths, Britain, 2001. 646- 749. 919- 960.