摘要
目的 对工作要求 -自主模式和付出 -回报失衡模式相应的 2个问卷 (工作内容问卷和付出 -回报失衡问卷 )的中文译本的信度和效度进行测评。方法 以 92 8名医护人员为研究对象 ,运用相关分析、因子分析和Logistic回归分析评价 2个问卷 6个模块 (“工作要求”、“自主程度”、“社会支持”、“外在付出”、“回报”、“内在投入”)的同质信度、结构效度和效标关联效度。结果 2个问卷 6个模块的Cronbach’sα系数在可接受的范围内 (0 .5 6～ 0 .82 ) ,说明同质信度较好 ;因子分析显示 ,2个问卷的结构效度与理论模式基本吻合 ,但“工作要求”与“内在投入”2个模块需要进一步修订 ;并且 2个问卷均表明职业紧张与抑郁症状具有明显的相关性 (OR :1.6 3～ 2 .6 4 ,P <0 .0 1) ,提示良好的效标关联效度。结论 工作要求 -自主模式和付出 -回报失衡模式及其相应问卷能够较好地应用于中国 ,评价社会心理因素对职业人群的影响 ,但仍需要进一步的修订。
Objective To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Job Content Questionnaire(JCQ) and Effort Reward Imbalance Questionnaire(ERI) based on the Job Demand Control Model and Effort Reward Imbalance Model respectively. Methods 928 health care workers in hospitals were investigated in this study.The self administered questionnaires were used to assess the psychosocial work environment,including job demand,control,social support,extrinsic effort,reward,and overcommitment.Meanwhile,the internal consistency reliability,construct validity and criterion validity were evaluated. Results The Cronbach's α coefficients for 6 scales were acceptable(0.56～0.82);factor analysis showed the close fitness with the theoretical constructs,though the “job demand” and “overcommitment” scales were still questioned;moreover,both demand control and effort reward imbalance were independently related to depressive symptom(OR:1.63～2.64,P< 0.01), indicating the satisfactory criterion validity. Conclusion Both Job Demand Control Model and Effort Reward Imbalance Model,with their relevant questionnaires were reliable and valid methods for measuring the psychosocial work environment and assessing the occupational stress among Chinese working population and further revision is necessary.
出处
《中华劳动卫生职业病杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2004年第6期422-426,共5页
Chinese Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases
