期刊文献+

贝叶斯推理研究综述 被引量:13

REVIEW ON BAYESIAN REASONING RESEARCH
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 Kahneman 和Tversky在70年代初期发现人们在概率推理中并不遵循数学上的贝叶斯定理,常常由于忽略问题中的基础概率而对稀少事件的条件概率作出夸大的反应。此后心理学家采用文本范式和经验范式对此问题进行了大量的研究,并涌现了一些不同的理论观点,主要有启发法策略论(代表性启发法和可得性启发法)、自然抽样空间假说、频率效应论和抽样加工理论。 In the early days of the 1970s, Kahneman and Tversky discovered that people do not follow the Bayes theorem and inflate conditional probability judgements of rare events because of neglecting the base rate in the problem. After that, a lot of studies of this issue have been performed using textual paradigm and experiential paradigm and many theories were developed, mainly including heuristics(representativeness and availability), natural sampling space hypotheses, frequency effect, and sampling approach theory.
作者 张向阳 刘鸣
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2002年第4期388-394,共7页 Advances in Psychological Science
关键词 贝叶斯推理 基础概率忽略现象 研究范式 Bayesian reasoning, base rate neglect, researching paradigm
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Mellers B A, McGraw A P. How to improve Bayesian reasoning: A comment on Gigerenzer and Hofrage(1995). Psychological Review, 1999, 106(2): 417-424
  • 2Eddy D .M. Probabilistic reasoning in clinic medicine: Problems and opportunities. In: Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tverskey A. ed. Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, 1982. 249-267
  • 3Kahneman D, Tversky A. Subjective probability: A judgement of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 1972, 3:430-454
  • 4Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A. Judgement under uncertainty:Heuristics and biases.Cambridge,England: Cambridge University Press, 1982
  • 5Cassecells W, Schoenberger A, Crayboys T. Interpretation by physicians of clinical laboratory results. New England Journal of Medicine, 1978,299: 999-1000
  • 6Bar-Hillel M.The base rate fallacy in probability judgements. Acta Psychology, 1980, 44: 211-233
  • 7Gigerenzer G, Hell W, Blank H. Presentation and content: The use of base rates as a continuous variable. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1988, 14: 513-525
  • 8Gigerenzer G, Hoffrage U. How to improve Bayesian Reasoning without instruction: Frequency fomats. Psychological Rewiew, 1995, 102 (4): 684-704
  • 9Lewis C, Keren G. On the difficulties underlying Bayesian reasoning: A comment on Gigerenzer and Hofrage. Psychological Review, 1999, 106(2): 411-416
  • 10Fiedler C, Brinkmann B, Betsch T, Wild B. A sampling approach to biases in conditional probabilityjudgments: Beyond base rate neglect and statistical format. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2000, 129: 399-418

同被引文献133

引证文献13

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部