期刊文献+

乳腺癌改良根治术后创面处理的改进分析 被引量:14

Improvement of wound treatment in modified radical mastectomy of breast cancer
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :评价乳腺癌改良根治术后创面处理改进方法 ,分析 Dexon皮内缝合加 Redon负压引流的应用效果。方法 :以 12 8例乳腺癌改良根治术后 ,应用 Dexon缝合加 Redon负压引流而创面处理改进的患者为实验组 ;以12 3例乳腺癌改良根治术后传统缝合加负压球引流处理患者为对照组 ,分析术后并发症和住院日的差异。结果 :12 8例实验组患者术后皮下积液 16例 (12 .5 % )、皮肤坏死 1例 (0 .78% )、术后平均住院时间为 8.83d;12 3例对照组患者皮下积液 4 7(38% )、皮肤坏死 16 (13% )、术后平均住院时间为 14 .6 7d;实验组结果明显优于对照组。结论 :以Dexon皮内缝合加 Redon负压引流方法改进乳癌改良根治术后创面的方法后 ,能使手术创面充分引流 ,明显降低并发症的发生 ,缩短住院时间 。 Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of Dexon continuous intracutaneous sewing (DCIS) and Redon negative pressure absorbing drainage (RNPAD) in modified radical mastectomy of breast cancer. Methods: The clinical data of 128 patients treated with DCIS and RNPAD, and 123 cases treated with traditional sewing and ne gative pressure absorbing ball were analyzed retrospectively. Results: There were 16 cases (12 5%) of seroma formation, 1 (0 8%) of skin flay necrosis among 128 cases treated by DCIS and RNPAD, and 47 cases (38%) of seroma formation, 16 (13%) of skin flay necrosis among 123 cases treated by traditional method. The statistically significant difference was found ( P <0.001). The average length of post operation hospital stay in DCIS and RNPAD group was 8 8 days compared with 14 7 days in traditional treatment group. Conclusion: The use of DCIS and TNPAD could decrease the complication rate of breast cancer operation.
出处 《浙江大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 2004年第5期456-458,共3页 Journal of Zhejiang University(Medical Sciences)
关键词 乳房肿瘤 乳房切除术 改良根治性 Dexon皮内缝合 Redon负压引流 手术后并发症 Mammary neoplasms Mastectomy,modified Dexon intracutaneous sewing Redon negative pressure drainage Postoperative complications
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1SHEN Zhen-zhou, SHAO Zhi-min(沈镇宙,邵志敏). The Recent Progress in Breast Tumor(现代乳腺肿瘤学进展)[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technological Literature Publishing House, 2002.(in Chinese)
  • 2WUZheng-yan(武正炎).The Complication Prevention and Treatment of General Surgery (普通外科手术并发症预防和处理)[M].Beijing: People''''''''s Military Medical Publisher,2002.113-121.
  • 3BONNEMA J, VAN GEEL A N, LIGTENSTEIN D A, et al. A prospective randomized trial of high versus low vacuum drainage after axillary dissection for breast cancer [J]. Am J Surg, 1997,173(2):76-79.
  • 4SOMERS R G, JABLON Lk, KAPLAN M J, et al. The use of closed suction drainage after lumpectomy and axillary node dissection for breast cancer [J]. Ann Surg, 1992,215(3):146-149.
  • 5CAMERON A E P, EBBS S R, WYLIE F, et al. Suction drainage of the axillary prospective randomized trail [J]. Br J Sury, 1998,75(6):1 211-1 213.
  • 6BARWELL J, CAMPBELL L, WATKINES R M, et al. How long should suction drains stay in after breast surgery with axillary dissection?[J]. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 1997,79(6):435-437.

同被引文献95

引证文献14

二级引证文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部