摘要
我们根据对于中西哲学各自的特质是否有清楚的认识和对于中国哲学之适应现代生活是否有自信心而将中西哲学的对话划分为四种范式 :无清楚认识而自信、无清楚认识而不自信、有清楚认识而自信和有清楚认识而不自信。在中西哲学的对话历史上 ,第二种对话范式曾长期居于支配地位 ,而近年来第三种范式的兴起则有着特别重要的意义 ,它使得中国传统哲学有可能以某种方式获得重建 ,并与第四种对话范式构成有利于真正形成一种适应于现代社会生活的现代中国哲学的张力关系。而这两种具有张力的对话范式之间的互动关系 。
This article identifies four models of philosophic dialogue between China and the West in the light of degrees of recognition of characteristics of each side, and self-confidence in adaptability of Chinese philosophy to modern life. The four models are as follows: (1), without clearly established recognition but with self confidence; (2), without either clearly established recognition nor self confidence; (3), with both clearly established recognition and self confidence; and (4), with clearly established recognition but without self confidence. The author maintains that while the second model had long been dominant in history, the increasing use of the third model in recent years is of great significance. It may lead to reconstruction of the traditional Chinese philosophy in some way, and may develop in positive correlation with the fourth model, which will enables contemporary Chinese philosophy to fit into the contemporary social life. The author predicts that the interactive relation between the third and the fourth models is likely to exist for a long period of time.
出处
《教学与研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2004年第6期11-16,共6页
Teaching and Research
关键词
对话范式
思维方式
中国哲学
西方哲学
models of dialogue
ways of thinking
Chinese philosophy
Western philosophy
