期刊文献+

显微内镜腰椎间盘髓核摘除术疗效预测因素的初步研究 被引量:12

Primary study on predictive factor of outcome of lumbar disc herniation treated with microendoscopic discectomy
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 以社会统计资料、病程、临床症状、神经体征和影像表现五个方面作为显微内镜椎间盘髓核摘除术(MED)治疗腰椎间盘突出症效果的预测因素,并评价其价值。方法 对198例首次接受单节段MED腰椎间盘突出症患者,进行前瞻性观测研究,患者平均年龄37.6岁(24-62岁)。制定腰椎间盘突出症选择MED手术的客观评价系统,以社会统计资料、病程、症状、神经体征和影像表现的各项分值计算总分,单项最高3分,满分34分。通过随访检查评价临床结果,进行结果和预测分值间的比较。结果 术后平均随访12.5个月,采用改良MacNab标准评定临床结果,152例(76.8%)患者达优,34例(17.2%)良,8例(4%)可,4例(2%)差。优组患者MED手术疗效预测因素评分平均27.1分,良组23.3分,可组19.8分,差组14.2分,各组间比较差异显著(P<0.01)。结论 根据预测计分,MED应选择预计结果优或良的患者,其他患者需再次考虑手术指征。 Objective To evaluate the prognostic value of sociodemographic data, duration of disease, clinical symptom, neurologic signs and imaging findings on outcome of lumbar disc hemiation treated with microendoscopic discectomy ( MED). Methods A prospective study of 198 consecutive patients (aged 24-62 years with a mean of 37.6 years) undergoing single level primary lumbar MED was conducted. An objective rating system for the patient with disc herniation treated with lumbar MED was presented. Based on the findings within each of five categories (sociodemographic data, history of disease, symptom, neurologic signs, imaging findings) , numeric scores were derived. A maximum of 3 points was available in each category with a total of 34 points. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by the examinations during follow-up. Comparisons between clinical results and predictive scores were made. Results The average duration of follow-up was 12. 5 months after surgery. Clinical outcomes were determined using a modified MacNab criteria. Overall, 152 (76.8% ) of 198 patients were rated as excellent ( mean score was 27.1 points) , 34 (17.2% ) were good (mean score was 23.3 points), 8 (4% ) were fair (mean score was 19.8 points) and 4 (2% ) were poor (mean score was 14. 2 points). Conclusion Lumbar microendoscopic discectomy should only be performed to the patients who can be rated as excellent or good according to their predictive scores. Otherwise, the operative approach should be reconsidered. If a poor outcome is predicted, conservative and psychological treatment are not suggested.
出处 《脊柱外科杂志》 2004年第3期129-132,共4页 Journal of Spinal Surgery
关键词 显微内镜 腰椎间盘髓核摘除术 疗效 预测因素 腰椎间盘突出症 lumbar disc herniation microendoscopic discectomy predictive factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1[1]Gordon F, Bruce I, B Sele Musa, et al. A 10~year follow-up of the outcome of lumbar microdsicectomy. Spine, 1998, 23:1168-1171
  • 2[2]Junge A, Frohlich M, Ahrens S, et al. Predictors of bad and good outcome of lumbar spine surgery. Spine, 1996, 21:1056-1065
  • 3[3]Vucetic N, Astrand P, Guntner P, et al. Diagnosis and prognosis in lumbar disc herniation. Clin Orthop, 1999, 361:116-122
  • 4[4]Nygaard QP, Kloster R, Solberg T. Duration of leg pain as a predictor of outcome after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective cohort study with 1-year follow up. J Neurosurg, 2000, 92:131-134
  • 5杨连发,李子荣,岳德波,张念非,吴宇光.腰椎间盘突出症手术疗效预测因素[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2000,10(1):18-22. 被引量:59
  • 6[6]Jonsson B, Stromqvist B. The straight leg raising test and the severity of symptoms in lumbar disc herniation. Spine, 1995, 20:27-30
  • 7[7]Carragee EJ, Han MY, Suen PW, et al. Clinical outcomes after lumbar discectomy for sciatica: the effects of fragment type and anular competence. J Bone Joint Surg, 2003, 85(A):102-108

二级参考文献10

  • 1[1]Fritsch EW,Heisel J,Rupp S.The failed back surgery syndrom reasons,intraoperative findings and long-term results:A report of 182 operative treatments.Spine[J],1996,21(5):626-633.
  • 2[2]Saal JA.Natural history and nonoperative treatment of lumbar disc herniation[J].Spine,1996,21(24s):2s-9s.
  • 3[3]Herron LD,Turner JA,Novell LA,et al.Patient selection for lumbar discectomy with a revised objective rating system[J].Clin Orthop,1996,325:148-155.
  • 4[4]Hasenbring M,Mariefeld G,Kuhlendahl D,et al.Risk factors of chronicity in lumbar disc patients:A prospective investigation of biologic,psychologic and social predictors of therapy outcome[J].Spine,1994,19(24):2759-2765.
  • 5[5]Spengler DM,Ouellette EA,Batie E,et al.Elective discectomy for herniation of a lumbar disc[J].J Bone Joint Surg,1990,72A(2):230-237.
  • 6[6]Junge A,Dvorak J,Ahrens S.Predictors of bad and good outcome of lumbar disc surgery:A prospective clinical study resulting in recommendations for screening to avoid bad outcome[J].Spine,1995,20(4):460-468.
  • 7[7]Abramovitz LD,Neff SR.Lumbar disc surgery:results of the prospective lumbar discectomy study of the joint section on disorder of the spine and peripheral nerves of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons[J].Neurosurgery,1991,29(2):301-307.
  • 8[8]Dvorak J,Gouchat MH,Valach L.The outcome of surgery for lumbar disc herniation:A 4~17 years,follow-up with emphasis on somatic aspects[J].Spine,1988,13(12):1418-1422.
  • 9[9]Carragee EJ,Kim DH.A prospective analysis of magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with sciatica and lumbar disc herniation:Correlation of outcomes with disc fragment and canal morphology[J].Spine,1997,22(14):1650-1660.
  • 10[10]Knop-Jergas BM,Zucherman JF,Hsu KY,et al.Anatomic position of a herniated nucleus pulposus predicts the outcome of lumbar discectomy[J].J Spinal Disord,1996,9(3):246-250.

共引文献58

同被引文献132

引证文献12

二级引证文献169

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部