摘要
This paper discusses the status, date, and other questions of the chariot-and-horse burialrecovered in 1993 at Luogang, Yicheng, Hubei.The status of the tomb’s occupant should notlower than the status of shangdafu. The chariot-and-horse burial was not the sacrificial burial ofMI, as suggested by the site report.Its date should be bracketed within the Spring-and -au-tumn Period . Moreover, the paper discusses the relationship between the occupant of the chari-ot-and-horse burial with the imperial city of Chu.
This paper discusses the status, date, and other questions of the chariot-and-horse burialrecovered in 1993 at Luogang, Yicheng, Hubei.The status of the tomb's occupant should notlower than the status of shangdafu. The chariot-and-horse burial was not the sacrificial burial ofMI, as suggested by the site report.Its date should be bracketed within the Spring-and -au-tumn Period . Moreover, the paper discusses the relationship between the occupant of the chari-ot-and-horse burial with the imperial city of Chu.
出处
《华夏考古》
1999年第2期77-80,45-113,共6页
Huaxia Archaeology
