摘要
目的通过比较锁定钢板与传统解剖钢板治疗复杂肱骨近端骨折(NeerⅢ,Ⅳ)疗效,探讨锁定钢板治疗复杂的肱骨近端骨折疗效是否存在优势性。方法对45例复杂肱骨近端骨折分别采用肱骨近端锁定钢板和解剖钢板进行内固定,从骨性愈合时间,术后功能恢复,及内固定失败率方面观察。结果 45例随访6～36个月,骨性愈合时间,术后功能恢复,及内固定失败率方面两组有明显差异;两组优良率有明显差异。结论锁定钢板治疗复杂肱骨近端骨折疗效更佳。
Objective By comparing the lock plate and anatomic plate in the treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures(to Neer III,IV) efficacy,to investigate whether there is dominance.Methods 45 cases of complex humeral proximal fractures using lock plates or anatomic plate fixation,the data of bone healing time,functional recovery and fixation failure rate were recorded.Results All the patients were followed for 6~36 months,there were significant differences in bone healing time,functional recovery and fixation failure rate between two groups.Conclusion Lock plate for treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures is better.
出处
《四川医学》
CAS
2012年第11期1935-1937,共3页
Sichuan Medical Journal
关键词
肱骨近端骨折
解剖钢板
锁定钢板
骨折内固定术
proximal humerus fracture
anatomical plate
lock plate fracture internal fixation
