期刊文献+

腹腔镜与开腹直肠癌根治术临床特点比较 被引量:9

Clinical Comparison of Laparoscopic Radical Operation with Traditional Operation on Treatment of Rectal Cancer
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:通过对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术与传统开腹直肠癌根治术的临床特点比较,探究腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的可行性、安全性。方法:收集分析本院2001年12月-2009年8月60例腹腔镜直肠癌根治术和80例传统开腹直肠癌根治术患者的临床资料。结果:腹腔镜直肠癌根治术组相对于传统手术组可减少术中出血、加快术后肛门首次排气时间及下床活动时间,两组费用、术后并发症、术后1年及3年生存率无差别。结论:腹腔镜直肠癌根治术可以达到传统手术的效果,同时与传统开腹手术相比,出血少,视野清晰,解剖层次清楚,操作方面,患者恢复快。 Objective To assess the feasibility and security of laparoscopic radical operation by comparison with traditional operation on treatment of rectal cancer.Methods The clinical data of 60 cases underwent laparoscopic radical operation and 80 cases underwent traditional operation from December 2001 to August 2009 were collected and analyzed.Results Laparoscopic operation could significantly decreased the blood loss,the time for bowel function recovery,post-operative dietary intake and recovery time compared with traditional operation.There were no significant difference in total cost,complications and survival rate of 1-year and 3-year postoperation between two groups.Conclusion Laparoscopic operation not only has the same radical effect for treating rectal cancer as traditional operation,but also has the advantage of less blood lost,more clear visual field and dissection order,more convenient operation and faster recovery.
出处 《郧阳医学院学报》 2011年第1期41-43,共3页 Journal of Yunyang Medical College
关键词 腹腔镜 直肠癌 根治术 传统开腹 Laparoscope Rectal cancer Traditional operation Radical operation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献20

  • 1郑民华,马君俊,冯波,张轶,陆爱国,胡艳艳,李健文,王明亮,刘炳亚,李宏为.CO_2气腹对结肠癌细胞粘附能力影响及其与粘附分子的关系[J].中国实用外科杂志,2005,25(11):668-670. 被引量:7
  • 2腹腔镜结肠直肠癌根治手术操作指南(2006版)[J].外科理论与实践,2006,11(5):462-464. 被引量:276
  • 3Guillou PJ,Quirke P,Thorpe H,et al.Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial):multicentre,randomised controlled trial.Lancet,2005,365:1718-1726.
  • 4Jayne DG,Guillou PJ,Thorpe H,et al.Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma:3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group.J Clin Oncol,2007,25:3061-3068.
  • 5Braga M,Frasson M,Vignali A,et al.Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients:outcome and cost-benefit analysis.Dis Colon Rectum,2007,50:464-471.
  • 6Leung KL,Kwok SP,Lam SC,et al.Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma:prospective randomised trial.Lancet,2004,363:1187-1192.
  • 7Zhou ZG,Hu M,Li Y,et al.Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer.Surg Endosc,2004,18:1211-1215.
  • 8Paraskeva PA,Aziz O,Darzi A.Laparoscopic surgery forcolon cancer.Surg Clin North Am,2005,85:49-60.
  • 9Breukink SO,Pierie JP,Grond AJ,et al.Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision:a case-control study.Int J Colorectal Dis,2005,20:428-433.
  • 10Dulucq JL,Wintringer P,Stabilini C,et al.Laparoscopic rectal resection with anal sphincter preservation for rectal cancer long-term outcome.Surg Endosc,2005,19:1468-1474.

共引文献24

同被引文献76

引证文献9

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部