期刊文献+

国立科技单元的科研评价探讨 被引量:5

Scientific research evaluation of national S&T units
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着全球科技一体化趋势的进一步来临,科研评价越来越被各国政府所重视,自20世纪60年代以来,欧美等科技发达国家先后就各自的科学机构尝试进行定量、半定量和定性相结合的综合评价,有的国家甚至把评价结果作为其R&D投入的主要依据。我国在该领域的研究起步较晚,但也逐步形成了国家、科研院校的一些评价体系,并力图制定出符合我国发展的评价理论方法。本文拟从科研评价的生命周期及国内外现状出发进行讨论,通过分析国内外科研机构评价的现状和趋势,初步探讨国立科技单元的科研评价问题。 With the impending over the scientific and technological globalization,scientific research assessment is drawing more and more attentions from the goverment of each country.Since the 1960s,occidental countries that are comparatively advanced in science and technology have made a stab at the comprehensive assessment through combination of quantitative,semi-quantitative,and qualitative methods.Some of them even take the assessment results as a major index of their national R&D investment.China started later in this realm,yet it is catching up fast by forming a variety of assessment systems at the national/institutional level.Besides,the nation is trying hard to formulate relevant theories and methods consistent with the national development.As viewed from the perspectives of the life cycle of scientific research assessment and its status quo nationally and internationally,through analysis of tendency and status quo in assessing national/international scientific research institutions,the scientific research assessment in newly-established national scientific and technological units is tended to probe into.
出处 《科研管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第z1期84-89,共6页 Science Research Management
基金 国家自然科学基金项目:40674073资助(2007-2009)
关键词 科研评价 科技单元 实施 scientific research assessment S&T unit implementation
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献41

  • 1徐联仓.组织行为学在中国之发展与领导行为研究[J].心理学报,1986,18(4):343-348. 被引量:15
  • 2李晓轩.德国科研机构的评价实践与启示[J].中国科学院院刊,2004,19(4):274-277. 被引量:44
  • 3David Demeritt,The New social contract for science: accountability, relevance, and value in US and UK science and research policy[J]. Antipode 32:3. 2000. pp. 308-329.
  • 4Susan E.Cozzens,Assessing federally-supported academic research in the United States[J]. Research Evaluation. Vol.8, No.1. 2000, pp5-10.
  • 5Ronald N. Kostoff,Peer Review: The Appropriate GPRA Metric for Research[J],Science,Volume 277, Number 5326, Issue of 1 Aug 1997, pp. 651-652.
  • 6Australian Research Council, Strategic Action Plan 2003-2005[R], http://www.arc.gov.au/pdf/ARC-StratPlan.pdf.
  • 7吴述尧.同行评价方法论[M].北京:科学出版社,1996..
  • 8Office of Extramural Research NIH Instructions to Reviewers for Evaluating Research Involving Human Subjects in Grant and Cooperative Agreement Applications[Z],25/8,2001.
  • 9Terrence Hoffman.The meanings of competency [J].Journal of European Industrial Training,23/6,1999:275-285.
  • 10Eliezer Geisler. The Metrics of Science and Technology[M]. Greenwood Publishing Group Inc. 2000.

共引文献299

同被引文献108

引证文献5

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部