期刊文献+

Predictive accuracy of the Braden Q Scale in risk assessment for paediatric pressure ulcer: A meta-analysis 被引量:9

在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 Aims:Paediatric pressure ulcers are a serious problem to healthcare service.Thus,effective and early identification of the risk of developing pressure ulcer is essential.The Braden Q scale is a widely used tool in the risk assessment of paediatric pressure ulcer,but its predictive power is controversial.Hence,we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the predictive power of the Braden Q scale for pressure ulcer in hospitalised children and offer recommendations for clinical decision.Methods:Studies that evaluated the predictive power of the Braden Q scale were searched through databases in English and Chinese,including Medline,Cochrane Library,Embase,CINAHL,SinoMed,CNKI,Wangfang and VIP.The studies were screened by two independent reviewers.QUADAS-2 was used to assess the risk of bias of eligible studies.Demographic data and predictive value indices were extracted.The pooled sensitivity,specificity and receiver operating characteristics(ROC)were calculated by MetaDiSc 1.4 using random-effects models.Results:Cochran Q=26.13(P=0.0036)indicated the existence of heterogeneity;the I2 for pooled DOR was 61.7%,suggesting significant heterogeneity among the included studies.The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.73(95%CI:0.67-0.78)and 0.61(95%CI:0.59-0.63),respectively,yielding a combined DOR of 3.47(95%CI:2-6.01).The area under the ROC curve was 0.7078±0.0421,and the overall diagnostic accuracy(Q*)was 0.6591±0.0337.Sensitivity analysis showed the results were robust.Conclusion:The Braden Q scale has moderate predictive validity with medium sensitivity and low specificity for pressure ulcers in hospitalised children.Further development and modification of this tool for use in paediatric population are warranted.
出处 《International Journal of Nursing Sciences》 2018年第4期419-426,共8页 国际护理科学(英文)
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献46

  • 1Defloor T, Grypdonck FHM. Pressure ulcers: validation of two risk assessment scales. J Cli Nurs,2005,14:373-382.
  • 2Defloor T, Grypdonck FHM. Validation of pressure ulcer risk as - sessment scales: a critique. J Adv Nurs,200d,48(6) :613-621.
  • 3Jalali R, Rezaie M. Predicting pressure ulcer risk:comparing the predicting validity of 4 scales. Adv Skin Wound Care, 2005,18 : 92- 97.
  • 4Curley MAQ, Razmus KS, Roberts KE, et al. Predicting pressure ulcer risk in pediatric patients. Nurs Res, 2003,52( 1 ) : 22 -31.
  • 5Kwong E, Pang S, Wong T, et al. Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in China's Mainland. App Nurs Res, 2005, 18: 122-128.
  • 6Bergstrom N, Braden JB. Predictive validity of the Braden scale a - mong black and white subjects. Nurs Res, 2002,5(6) : 398-403.
  • 7Mclane KM. The 2003 national pediatric pressure ulcer and skin breakdown prevalence survey. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 2004,31 : 168-178.
  • 8Bergstrom N, Braden B, Kemp M, et al. Multi - site study of inci - dence of pressure ulcers and the relationship between risk level,demographic characteristics, diagnoses, and prescription of preventive interventions. Journal of American Geriatric Society, 1996,44::22- 30.
  • 9Brandeis GH, Morris JN, Nash DJ, et al. The epidemiology and natural history of pressure ulcers in elderly nursing home residents. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1990,264: 2905 - 2909.
  • 10Thomson R.McElroy H.Sudlow M.Guidelines on anticoagulant treatment in atrial fibrillation in Great Britain:Variation incontent and implications for treatment [J].BMJ.1998,316:509-513.

共引文献127

同被引文献78

引证文献9

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部