摘要
《中华人民共和国民法典》第237条规定的恢复原状请求权在性质上属于独立的物权请求权,准确适用恢复原状请求权需要明确《中华人民共和国民法典》第237条和第179条的体系关联。恢复原状是与赔偿损失并列的责任形式,其并非损害赔偿的基本原则。《中华人民共和国民法典》第179条规定恢复原状规则具有价值指引功能,即在有体物遭受侵害的情形下,如果能够修复,则应当尽可能修复,《中华人民共和国民法典》第237条全面落实了这一精神。该条规定的恢复原状作为物权请求权的形式,能够发挥保护物权人的独特作用。在具体适用恢复原状规则时,还需要准确界分其与修理、重作、更换之间的关系,明确恢复原状与损害赔偿的关联,并对恢复原状与其他请求权竞合的情形进行体系化分析。
The right of restitution claim stipulated in Article 237 of Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China is an independent right of the real claim in nature,and it’s need to clarify the systematic relationship between Article 237 and Article 179 of Civil Code for exacting application of the right of restitution claim.Restitution is a form of liability which is parallel to compensation for loss,and it is not the basic principle of compensation for damage.The rule of Article 179 of Civil Code has the value guidance function,in the case of an object being infringed,if it can be repaired,it should be repaired as much as possible;The spirit is fully implemented in Article 237 of Civil Code,which stipulates that“Restitution”as a form of property claim can play a unique role in protecting the property owners.In the specific application of the restitution rule,it is also necessary to accurately distinguish its relationship with repair,redo and replacement,and clarify the relationship between restitution and compensation for damage,and systematically analyze the situation of the concurrence of restitution and other claims.
出处
《法商研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第1期3-20,共18页
Studies in Law and Business
基金
中国人民大学重大规划项目(22XNLG01)
关键词
民法典
恢复原状
损害赔偿
体系化视角
Civil Code
restitution
compensation for damage
systematic
