摘要
"证据偏在"问题在反垄断民事诉讼中广泛存在且较一般的民事诉讼问题更为突出。证据开示制度正是矫正这一缺陷的根本制度设计。我国民事诉讼法相关制度设计存在不足,也不能适应复杂的反垄断民事诉讼。我国无论实体法还是程序法与大陆法系更为接近,欧盟证据开示制度更具有借鉴意义。在一般民事诉讼证据开示规则之外,单独设立反垄断民事诉讼证据开示规则,是我国反垄断民事诉讼的必然选择。即以民事诉讼法证据开示制度为框架,以法院为中心创设反垄断民事诉讼证据开示制度,围绕证据开示的启动程序、适用条件、对象范围及对违反证据开示的制裁等方面设计该制度。
The problem of"evidence bias"is widespread in the anti-monopoly civil litigation and more prominent than the general issue of civil litigation.Active and passive discovery is the fundamental system design to correct this defect.The system design of China’s civil procedure law is inadequate,and it can not adapt to the complicated anti-monopoly civil litigation.China’s substantive law and procedural law are both closer to the civil law system,so that the evidence discovery system of the EU is also more instructive.It is an inevitable choice for China’s is that separate design anti-monopoly civil litigation rules of evidence discovery in addition to the general rules of civil litigation.That is,taking the evidence discovery system of the civil procedure law as the framework,the anti-monopoly civil litigation evidence discovery system is created with the court as the center,and the system is designed around the starting procedures of evidence discovery,the application conditions of evidence discovery,the object scope of evidence discovery and the sanctions for violations of evidence discovery.
作者
时建中
袁晓磊
Shi Jianzhong;Yuan Xiaolei(不详)
出处
《法学杂志》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第1期80-88,共9页
Law Science Magazine
关键词
反垄断
民事诉讼
证据偏在
证据开示
anti-monopoly
civil litigation
evidence bias
evidence discovery
