摘要
在卡朋特诉合众国案的判决中,美国联邦最高法院对宪法第四修正案下隐私权保护的规则有了进一步的发展,此案言明了隐私权保护的"合法的隐私期待"标准。为进一步说明卡朋特案判决的依据,回溯两起罗伯茨法院回应科技挑战宪法第四修正案调整范围的案例——琼斯案和莱利伍瑞案,尝试归纳以罗伯茨为首席大法官的美国联邦最高法院在科技时代背景下隐私保护的新观点及其判决的方法论依据。
In Carpenter v.United States,the Supreme Court of the United States further developed the rules of privacy protection under the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution,which stated the"legitimate expectation of privacy"standard.This paper was fully interpreted the Carpenter case.Firstly,analyzing two cases of Roberts Court which was responded to the challenge of science and technology development,the Jones case and the Riley case,and summarizing the new opinions of the Supreme Court of the United State.Secondly,explaining the methodology which the majority Justices applied in the private protection case.Finally,stating the judicial minimalism which was demonstrated in the Carpenter case.
出处
《人权研究（辑刊）》
2019年第2期335-353,共19页
Journal of Human Rights
基金
中国法学会项目“人民警察法立法完善研究”(项目编号:CLS12016707)的阶段性成果.
关键词
第四修正案
合法的隐私期待
侵入理论
司法最低限度主义
the Fourth Amendment
the Legitimate Expectation of Privacy
Theory of Intrusion
Judicial Minimalism
