摘要
文章指出中国建筑学期刊面临三大困境:学科分类体制障碍;建筑学内涵的交叉学科特征;主要基于引用数量的评价系统障碍。进而,文章通过对引文内容的分析为切入,对建筑学、设计学、土木工程学三大学科的代表期刊进行实证分析,以初步揭示针对建筑学学术论文及其载体“期刊”的引用规律特征与内在逻辑,及与共同分类相关学科的区别与联系。研究发现,建筑学期刊引用行为特征与土木工程学具有结构性差异,而与设计学期刊具有类似性;以科学研究微观单位“引文”特征,具体揭示分类问题、学科特征与引文数量评价问题,从而提出针对性对策与建议。
The article points out the triple dilemmas that architectural journals in China face in their assessment:the obstacles in disciplinary classification,the cross-disciplinary character of architectural connotation,and the obstacles in the assessment system depending on how many citations an essay has.Then,with an analysis of the citation context,it looks at the top journals in the fields of architecture,design,and civil engineering,revealing the rules that citations follow,the inherent logic of academic papers in these fields,and the journals that carry them.The differences and similarities between the subjects in the same category are also identified.The study finds out that the citation practices of architectural journals are structurally different from those of civil engineering ones,while they are similar to those of design ones.By investigating citations,a micro measure of research,this study highlights the problems with classification,disciplinary characteristics,and quantity-based assessment,and proposes viable solutions and suggestions.
作者
黄婧琳
支文军
HUANG Jinglin;ZHI Wenjun
出处
《时代建筑》
2024年第1期178-185,共8页
Time + Architecture
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目(20ZD11)
国家自然科学基金(52278037)
关键词
建筑学期刊
评价体系
研究范式
引文行为
引文内容
Architectural Journals
Assessment System
Research Paradigm
Citation Context
