摘要
随着国际经贸关系的日益复杂化与商事仲裁的迅速发展,仲裁案外人准入程序已成为仲裁实践和理论研究的重点议题。通过深入分析,发现在实践中仲裁案外人准入程序存在几个问题:首先,仲裁中案外人加入的准司法性质与仲裁当事人自愿原则存在冲突;其次,案外人准入仲裁程序的标准判定模糊;最后,案外人准入仲裁程序后的权利保障存在问题。因此,需要在仲裁自愿原则和准司法权之间找到平衡点,并以“案外人”是否属于“同一仲裁协议”为准区分不同的准入程序,同时确保案外人准入后能享有相应的权利,以推动仲裁案外人准入程序的优化。
With the increasing complexity of international economic and trade relations and the rapid development of commercial arbitration,the procedure of joining non-signatory parties in arbitration has become a key topic in arbitration practice and theoretical research.Through in-depth analysis,it is found that in practice,there are several problems in the joining procedure of non-signatory parties in arbitration:firstly,the quasi-judicial nature of joining by non-signatory parties in arbitration conflicts with the principle of voluntariness of the parties;secondly,the standard of joining in arbitration by non-signatory parties is ambiguous;and lastly,how to safeguard the rights of non-signatory parties after joining in arbitration in order to improve and perfect the joining procedure of non-signatory parties in arbitration,the following measures can be taken.Therefore,it is necessary to find a balance between the principle of arbitration voluntariness and quasi-jurisdictional power,and distinguish different access procedures based on whether the“non-signatory parties”belongs to the“same arbitration agreement”,and at the same time ensure that the non-signatory parties can enjoy the corresponding rights after access,so as to promote the optimization of the access procedure for the non-signatory parties.
出处
《商事仲裁与调解》
2024年第4期15-26,共12页
Commercial Arbitration & Mediation
关键词
仲裁
案外人
准入程序
同一仲裁协议
arbitration
non-signatory parties
procedure for joining the arbitration
the same arbitration agreement
