The treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) has increased significantly in recent years. In patients affected by HBeAg-negative CHB, it is necessary to distinguish the inactive carriers (low viral DNA 2000 IU/mL, norma...The treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) has increased significantly in recent years. In patients affected by HBeAg-negative CHB, it is necessary to distinguish the inactive carriers (low viral DNA 2000 IU/mL, normal ALT, histological lesions absent or minimal) who does not need treatment, and patients suffering from active CHB (DNA > 2000 IU/ml, high transaminases or fluctuating, significant fibrosis and/or necro-inflammatory activity > 1) who must be treated. The main purpose of treatment is to obtain a long-lasting viral suppression to improve the histological lesions and reduce the risk of evolution towards cirrhosis, liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It about an indefinite treatment (unless HBsAg seroclearance) expensive and often inaccessible for the majority of our patients. Our study aimed to report the results of four years follow-up of HBeAg-negative patients treated by Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) in Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso). It was a clinical observational study with 133 patients including 95 men;the average age was 41.2 years, completing the criteria of treatment. One hundred and twelve patients were treated by tenofovir (TDF), fourteen by lamivudine and seven co-infected HIV/HBV patients by Atripla<sup>®</sup> (combination TDF, Emtricitabine and Efavirenz). Virological and biochemical responses were respectively 100% and 94% after 4 years. The rate of HBsAg seroclearance was 1.5%. Twelve of fourteen patients (85.7%) had lamivudine resistance and no cases of resistance in the TDF and Atripla<sup>®</sup> groups. One co-infected patient developed HCC during treatment. Among patients treated by TDF, two cases of hypophosphatemia were noticed and no case of kidney failure. The treatment of CHB is certainly progressing;updated guidelines (EASL, AASLD) exist but should be adapted to the African context.展开更多
Background and aims:Cessation of nucleoside/nucleotide analogue(Nuc)therapy in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B(CHB)remains controversial.Methods:In this prospective,single-center cohort study,we recru...Background and aims:Cessation of nucleoside/nucleotide analogue(Nuc)therapy in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B(CHB)remains controversial.Methods:In this prospective,single-center cohort study,we recruited 45 patients with HBeAg-negative CHB from The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital in China's Mainland.Patients were classified into a Nuc cessation group(n?27)and Nuc continuation group(n?18)and followed-up for 36 months.Nuc were stopped after being inactive for at least 4 years(normal alanine aminotransferase(ALT),undetectable hepatitis B virus(HBV)DNA),with liver fibrosisStage1(S1)and inflammationGrade(G1).Results:Within 3 years of follow-up,51.9%patients with Nuc cessation had virological relapse and 14.8%had ALT elevation,while all patients with Nuc continuation had undetectable HBV DNA and normal ALT.The rate of HBsAg loss after Nuc cessation was 22.2%compared with no seroconversion in patients with Nuc continuation.The hepatitis flare rate was 11.1%and there were no cases of hepatic decompensation after Nuc cessation.End of treatment(EOT)HBsAg,HBV RNA,and decline in HBV core-related antigen(HBcrAg)rate were predictive markers for HBsAg seroconversion at 6 months post-Nuc cessation.Conclusion:This study showed favorable HBsAg loss and low hepatitis flare rates after Nuc cessation.EOT HBsAg,HBV RNA,and decline in HBcrAg rate were predictive markers for HBsAg seroconversion at 6 months post-Nuc cessation.展开更多
BACKGROUND: It has been demonstrated that only a minority of patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) obtain a sustained response after either interferon (IFN) or nucleos (t)ide a...BACKGROUND: It has been demonstrated that only a minority of patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) obtain a sustained response after either interferon (IFN) or nucleos (t)ide analogue monotherapy. Therefore, combination therapy of drugs with synergistic antiviral effects was proposed to have a sustained response in these patients. We compared the effect and safety of lamivudine monotherapy and its combination with IFN including conventional interferon (CON-IFN) and pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) for HBeAg-negative CHB patients. DATA SOURCES: A group of three independent reviewers identified 9 eligible randomized controlled trials through electronic searches (MEDLINE, OVID, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library Clinical Trials Registry, and the Chinese Medical Database), manual searches, and contact with experts. Sustained virological and biochemical responses were defined as primary efficacy measures. We performed quantitative meta-analyses to assess differences between CON-IFN plus lamivudine combination and lamivudine monotherapy groups. RESULTS: No greater sustained virological and biochemical rates were found in patients receiving CON-IFN/lamivudine combination therapy [29.1% vs. 26.7%, odds ratio (OR)=0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-1.50, P=0.94, and 41.8% vs. 40.3%, OR=1.13, 95% CI 0.78-1.65, P=0.51, respectively],though a reduced YMDD mutation rate was achieved in the combination group [8.39% vs. 30.0%, OR=0.16, 95% CI 0.076-0.33, P<0.001]. However, data from one PEG-IFN trial showed greater sustained virological and biochemical rates in patients receiving combination therapy [response rate 19.5% vs. 6.6%, OR=3.42, 95% CI 1.71-6.84, P<0.001 and 60.0% vs. 44.2%, OR=1.88, 95% CI 1.23-2.85, P=0.003, respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of CON-IFN to lamivudine did not improve treatment efficacy but suppressed YMDD mutation by lamivudine. Combination of PEG-IFN and lamivudine might increase the sustained response, and further clinical trials are needed for confirmation.展开更多
文摘The treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) has increased significantly in recent years. In patients affected by HBeAg-negative CHB, it is necessary to distinguish the inactive carriers (low viral DNA 2000 IU/mL, normal ALT, histological lesions absent or minimal) who does not need treatment, and patients suffering from active CHB (DNA > 2000 IU/ml, high transaminases or fluctuating, significant fibrosis and/or necro-inflammatory activity > 1) who must be treated. The main purpose of treatment is to obtain a long-lasting viral suppression to improve the histological lesions and reduce the risk of evolution towards cirrhosis, liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It about an indefinite treatment (unless HBsAg seroclearance) expensive and often inaccessible for the majority of our patients. Our study aimed to report the results of four years follow-up of HBeAg-negative patients treated by Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) in Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso). It was a clinical observational study with 133 patients including 95 men;the average age was 41.2 years, completing the criteria of treatment. One hundred and twelve patients were treated by tenofovir (TDF), fourteen by lamivudine and seven co-infected HIV/HBV patients by Atripla<sup>®</sup> (combination TDF, Emtricitabine and Efavirenz). Virological and biochemical responses were respectively 100% and 94% after 4 years. The rate of HBsAg seroclearance was 1.5%. Twelve of fourteen patients (85.7%) had lamivudine resistance and no cases of resistance in the TDF and Atripla<sup>®</sup> groups. One co-infected patient developed HCC during treatment. Among patients treated by TDF, two cases of hypophosphatemia were noticed and no case of kidney failure. The treatment of CHB is certainly progressing;updated guidelines (EASL, AASLD) exist but should be adapted to the African context.
基金supported by the Beijing Municipal Foundation for Clinical Research[Z181100001718033]the Project for Prevention and Treatment of AIDS and Viral Hepatitis[2018ZX10301-404]the National Major Science and Technology Project of China[2019YFC0840704].
文摘Background and aims:Cessation of nucleoside/nucleotide analogue(Nuc)therapy in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B(CHB)remains controversial.Methods:In this prospective,single-center cohort study,we recruited 45 patients with HBeAg-negative CHB from The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital in China's Mainland.Patients were classified into a Nuc cessation group(n?27)and Nuc continuation group(n?18)and followed-up for 36 months.Nuc were stopped after being inactive for at least 4 years(normal alanine aminotransferase(ALT),undetectable hepatitis B virus(HBV)DNA),with liver fibrosisStage1(S1)and inflammationGrade(G1).Results:Within 3 years of follow-up,51.9%patients with Nuc cessation had virological relapse and 14.8%had ALT elevation,while all patients with Nuc continuation had undetectable HBV DNA and normal ALT.The rate of HBsAg loss after Nuc cessation was 22.2%compared with no seroconversion in patients with Nuc continuation.The hepatitis flare rate was 11.1%and there were no cases of hepatic decompensation after Nuc cessation.End of treatment(EOT)HBsAg,HBV RNA,and decline in HBV core-related antigen(HBcrAg)rate were predictive markers for HBsAg seroconversion at 6 months post-Nuc cessation.Conclusion:This study showed favorable HBsAg loss and low hepatitis flare rates after Nuc cessation.EOT HBsAg,HBV RNA,and decline in HBcrAg rate were predictive markers for HBsAg seroconversion at 6 months post-Nuc cessation.
基金supported by grants from the Major State Basic Research Development Program (973) (No. 2007CB512905)the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30771918)the Major State S&T Projects of China (11th Five-Year) (2008ZX10002-007)
文摘BACKGROUND: It has been demonstrated that only a minority of patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) obtain a sustained response after either interferon (IFN) or nucleos (t)ide analogue monotherapy. Therefore, combination therapy of drugs with synergistic antiviral effects was proposed to have a sustained response in these patients. We compared the effect and safety of lamivudine monotherapy and its combination with IFN including conventional interferon (CON-IFN) and pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) for HBeAg-negative CHB patients. DATA SOURCES: A group of three independent reviewers identified 9 eligible randomized controlled trials through electronic searches (MEDLINE, OVID, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library Clinical Trials Registry, and the Chinese Medical Database), manual searches, and contact with experts. Sustained virological and biochemical responses were defined as primary efficacy measures. We performed quantitative meta-analyses to assess differences between CON-IFN plus lamivudine combination and lamivudine monotherapy groups. RESULTS: No greater sustained virological and biochemical rates were found in patients receiving CON-IFN/lamivudine combination therapy [29.1% vs. 26.7%, odds ratio (OR)=0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-1.50, P=0.94, and 41.8% vs. 40.3%, OR=1.13, 95% CI 0.78-1.65, P=0.51, respectively],though a reduced YMDD mutation rate was achieved in the combination group [8.39% vs. 30.0%, OR=0.16, 95% CI 0.076-0.33, P<0.001]. However, data from one PEG-IFN trial showed greater sustained virological and biochemical rates in patients receiving combination therapy [response rate 19.5% vs. 6.6%, OR=3.42, 95% CI 1.71-6.84, P<0.001 and 60.0% vs. 44.2%, OR=1.88, 95% CI 1.23-2.85, P=0.003, respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of CON-IFN to lamivudine did not improve treatment efficacy but suppressed YMDD mutation by lamivudine. Combination of PEG-IFN and lamivudine might increase the sustained response, and further clinical trials are needed for confirmation.
