“解释世界”和“改变世界”是马克思的经典命题,对该命题的解释在学界一直存在争议。以实践概念入手,提出“解释世界”本身存在现实的解释世界与幻想的解释世界,以实现对幻想世界的批判,从而使现实的解释世界隶属于改变世界本身来辨析...“解释世界”和“改变世界”是马克思的经典命题,对该命题的解释在学界一直存在争议。以实践概念入手,提出“解释世界”本身存在现实的解释世界与幻想的解释世界,以实现对幻想世界的批判,从而使现实的解释世界隶属于改变世界本身来辨析马克思的“解释世界”与“改变世界”之间的关系。以马克思实践观解读马克思只是批判“只是解释世界”而并不批判“解释世界”。与“改变世界”一样,“解释世界”本身也是在改变世界,解释世界和改变世界是基于历史的具体的统一。“Interpreting the world” and “changing the world” are Marx’s classic propositions, the interpretation of which has been controversial in academia. Beginning with the concept of practice, it is proposed that the “interpreting the world” itself exists as a real world of interpretation and an imaginary world of interpretation, in order to realize the critique of the imaginary world, so that the real world of interpretation is subordinate to the world of change itself, and to identify the relationship between Marx’s “interpreting the world” and the “changing the world”. Interpreting Marx in terms of Marxian practice, Marx only criticizes “merely interpreting the world” but not “interpreting the world”. Like “changing the world”, “interpreting the world” is itself changing the world, and interpreting the world and changing the world are based on the concrete unity of history.展开更多
文摘“解释世界”和“改变世界”是马克思的经典命题,对该命题的解释在学界一直存在争议。以实践概念入手,提出“解释世界”本身存在现实的解释世界与幻想的解释世界,以实现对幻想世界的批判,从而使现实的解释世界隶属于改变世界本身来辨析马克思的“解释世界”与“改变世界”之间的关系。以马克思实践观解读马克思只是批判“只是解释世界”而并不批判“解释世界”。与“改变世界”一样,“解释世界”本身也是在改变世界,解释世界和改变世界是基于历史的具体的统一。“Interpreting the world” and “changing the world” are Marx’s classic propositions, the interpretation of which has been controversial in academia. Beginning with the concept of practice, it is proposed that the “interpreting the world” itself exists as a real world of interpretation and an imaginary world of interpretation, in order to realize the critique of the imaginary world, so that the real world of interpretation is subordinate to the world of change itself, and to identify the relationship between Marx’s “interpreting the world” and the “changing the world”. Interpreting Marx in terms of Marxian practice, Marx only criticizes “merely interpreting the world” but not “interpreting the world”. Like “changing the world”, “interpreting the world” is itself changing the world, and interpreting the world and changing the world are based on the concrete unity of history.
