通过文献回顾,本文探讨了批判性话语分析(Critical Discourse Analysis, CDA)在心理学中的应用与意义,重点分析其理论基础、方法框架及未来发展方向。首先,本文阐述了CDA的理论基础,强调其在揭示语言与社会实践之间复杂关系中的作用,并...通过文献回顾,本文探讨了批判性话语分析(Critical Discourse Analysis, CDA)在心理学中的应用与意义,重点分析其理论基础、方法框架及未来发展方向。首先,本文阐述了CDA的理论基础,强调其在揭示语言与社会实践之间复杂关系中的作用,并在心理学视角下对CDA进行定义和理解;在方法框架部分,本文探讨了CDA的方法多样性,列举出了以Fairclough、van A Dijk等人为代表的分析框架。此外,本文还指出CDA对于心理学的重要意义以及其本身存在的局限,并建议未来应加强跨学科整合,结合新兴技术,以扩展其分析深度和广度,使其在新的社会环境中持续为社会公平、正义与进步提供深刻见解和广泛分析视角。Through literature review, this paper explores the application and significance of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) in psychology, with a focus on analyzing its theoretical basis, methodological framework and future development directions. Firstly, this paper elaborates on the theoretical basis of CDA, emphasizing its role in revealing the complex relationship between language and social practice, and defines and understands CDA from a psychological perspective. In the part of the methodological framework, this paper discusses the methodological diversity of CDA and lists the analytical frameworks represented by Fairclough, van A Dijk and others. In addition, this paper also points out the significant importance of CDA for psychology as well as its existing limitations, and suggests that in the future, interdisciplinary integration should be strengthened and combined with emerging technologies to expand its depth and breadth of analysis, enabling it to continuously provide profound insights and a broad analytical perspective for social fairness, justice and progress in the new social environment.展开更多
文摘通过文献回顾,本文探讨了批判性话语分析(Critical Discourse Analysis, CDA)在心理学中的应用与意义,重点分析其理论基础、方法框架及未来发展方向。首先,本文阐述了CDA的理论基础,强调其在揭示语言与社会实践之间复杂关系中的作用,并在心理学视角下对CDA进行定义和理解;在方法框架部分,本文探讨了CDA的方法多样性,列举出了以Fairclough、van A Dijk等人为代表的分析框架。此外,本文还指出CDA对于心理学的重要意义以及其本身存在的局限,并建议未来应加强跨学科整合,结合新兴技术,以扩展其分析深度和广度,使其在新的社会环境中持续为社会公平、正义与进步提供深刻见解和广泛分析视角。Through literature review, this paper explores the application and significance of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) in psychology, with a focus on analyzing its theoretical basis, methodological framework and future development directions. Firstly, this paper elaborates on the theoretical basis of CDA, emphasizing its role in revealing the complex relationship between language and social practice, and defines and understands CDA from a psychological perspective. In the part of the methodological framework, this paper discusses the methodological diversity of CDA and lists the analytical frameworks represented by Fairclough, van A Dijk and others. In addition, this paper also points out the significant importance of CDA for psychology as well as its existing limitations, and suggests that in the future, interdisciplinary integration should be strengthened and combined with emerging technologies to expand its depth and breadth of analysis, enabling it to continuously provide profound insights and a broad analytical perspective for social fairness, justice and progress in the new social environment.
