本研究通过两个情景实验考察了品味的偶然相似对宽恕倾向的影响及其内在心理机制。实验1考察品味的偶然相似性对宽恕倾向的积极影响,并检验亲密感的中介作用;实验2考察品味小众程度的调节作用。结果发现:1) 偶然相似性会增加个体对冒犯...本研究通过两个情景实验考察了品味的偶然相似对宽恕倾向的影响及其内在心理机制。实验1考察品味的偶然相似性对宽恕倾向的积极影响,并检验亲密感的中介作用;实验2考察品味小众程度的调节作用。结果发现:1) 偶然相似性会增加个体对冒犯者在情绪维度上的宽恕倾向,但是对认知和行为维度的宽恕倾向没有显著的影响;2) 亲密感在偶然相似性和宽恕倾向之间的中介作用不显著。3) 小众程度在偶然相似性与宽恕倾向之间的调节作用边缘显著。研究结果表明品味的偶然相似性可以增加人们的宽恕倾向,为缓解人际冲突中紧张的人际关系提供了理论参考。This study examined the effect of accidental similarity of taste on forgiveness tendency and its underlying psychological mechanism through two situational experiments. Experiment 1 examined the positive effect of accidental similarity of taste on forgiveness tendency and examined the mediating role of intimacy. Experiment 2 examined the moderating effect of taste special-interest degree. The results showed that: 1) Accidental similarity increased individuals’ forgiveness tendency on emotional dimensions, but had no significant effect on cognitive and behavioral dimensions. 2) The mediating effect of intimacy between accidental similarity and forgiveness tendency is not significant. 3) The moderating effect of special-interest degree on accidental similarity and forgiveness tendency was significant. The results show that accidental similarity of taste can increase people’s forgiveness tendency, which provides a theoretical reference for relieving interpersonal tension in interpersonal conflict.展开更多
斯宾诺莎的哲学长久以来都被认为是封闭的决定论体系。在实体内部,神的必然性贯穿一切,偶然性只能作为人类经验到的错误认识而存在。但并非所有人都能够完成斯宾诺莎设想的认识序列而达至对必然性的认识,并且人类碍于自身的有限性,只能...斯宾诺莎的哲学长久以来都被认为是封闭的决定论体系。在实体内部,神的必然性贯穿一切,偶然性只能作为人类经验到的错误认识而存在。但并非所有人都能够完成斯宾诺莎设想的认识序列而达至对必然性的认识,并且人类碍于自身的有限性,只能形式化地认识到神的必然性,不可能知道这种支配关系的内容。斯宾诺莎哲学的悖论就在于,他需要消除人与神之间的隔阂,但又需要借用人类的有限性来反衬神的完满。因此,斯宾诺莎在尝试彻底摒弃偶然性的同时,却不可避免地让偶然性在有限者的层面持续发挥效果。Spinoza’s philosophy has long been regarded as a closed deterministic system. Within the substance, the necessity of God permeates everything, while contingency exists only as a misguided perception experienced by humans. However, not everyone is capable of completing the cognitive sequence envisioned by Spinoza to achieve an understanding of necessity. Moreover, constrained by their own finitude, humans can only formally recognize the necessity of God without comprehending the content of this dominant relationship. The paradox of Spinoza’s philosophy lies in the fact that while he seeks to bridge the gap between humans and God, he also relies on human finitude to underscore the perfection of God. Consequently, despite attempting to completely eliminate contingency, Spinoza inevitably allows contingency to persist and exert its influence at the level of finite beings.展开更多
文摘本研究通过两个情景实验考察了品味的偶然相似对宽恕倾向的影响及其内在心理机制。实验1考察品味的偶然相似性对宽恕倾向的积极影响,并检验亲密感的中介作用;实验2考察品味小众程度的调节作用。结果发现:1) 偶然相似性会增加个体对冒犯者在情绪维度上的宽恕倾向,但是对认知和行为维度的宽恕倾向没有显著的影响;2) 亲密感在偶然相似性和宽恕倾向之间的中介作用不显著。3) 小众程度在偶然相似性与宽恕倾向之间的调节作用边缘显著。研究结果表明品味的偶然相似性可以增加人们的宽恕倾向,为缓解人际冲突中紧张的人际关系提供了理论参考。This study examined the effect of accidental similarity of taste on forgiveness tendency and its underlying psychological mechanism through two situational experiments. Experiment 1 examined the positive effect of accidental similarity of taste on forgiveness tendency and examined the mediating role of intimacy. Experiment 2 examined the moderating effect of taste special-interest degree. The results showed that: 1) Accidental similarity increased individuals’ forgiveness tendency on emotional dimensions, but had no significant effect on cognitive and behavioral dimensions. 2) The mediating effect of intimacy between accidental similarity and forgiveness tendency is not significant. 3) The moderating effect of special-interest degree on accidental similarity and forgiveness tendency was significant. The results show that accidental similarity of taste can increase people’s forgiveness tendency, which provides a theoretical reference for relieving interpersonal tension in interpersonal conflict.
文摘斯宾诺莎的哲学长久以来都被认为是封闭的决定论体系。在实体内部,神的必然性贯穿一切,偶然性只能作为人类经验到的错误认识而存在。但并非所有人都能够完成斯宾诺莎设想的认识序列而达至对必然性的认识,并且人类碍于自身的有限性,只能形式化地认识到神的必然性,不可能知道这种支配关系的内容。斯宾诺莎哲学的悖论就在于,他需要消除人与神之间的隔阂,但又需要借用人类的有限性来反衬神的完满。因此,斯宾诺莎在尝试彻底摒弃偶然性的同时,却不可避免地让偶然性在有限者的层面持续发挥效果。Spinoza’s philosophy has long been regarded as a closed deterministic system. Within the substance, the necessity of God permeates everything, while contingency exists only as a misguided perception experienced by humans. However, not everyone is capable of completing the cognitive sequence envisioned by Spinoza to achieve an understanding of necessity. Moreover, constrained by their own finitude, humans can only formally recognize the necessity of God without comprehending the content of this dominant relationship. The paradox of Spinoza’s philosophy lies in the fact that while he seeks to bridge the gap between humans and God, he also relies on human finitude to underscore the perfection of God. Consequently, despite attempting to completely eliminate contingency, Spinoza inevitably allows contingency to persist and exert its influence at the level of finite beings.
