能源是全球化进程中至关重要的动力,关系着国家的经济、政治和战略安全。中国与欧盟在能源方面具备广泛合作空间。本文基于马丁的评价理论,选取中国和欧盟主流媒体的能源与环境英文报道为语料,利用UAM Corpus Tool3.3软件对语料中的介...能源是全球化进程中至关重要的动力,关系着国家的经济、政治和战略安全。中国与欧盟在能源方面具备广泛合作空间。本文基于马丁的评价理论,选取中国和欧盟主流媒体的能源与环境英文报道为语料,利用UAM Corpus Tool3.3软件对语料中的介入系统进行手工批注,对数据进行标准化及差异性检验后发现,欧盟使用介入资源的频率更高,选择类型更多样。在话语收缩层面,中国使用的否认资源与宣告资源的频率相近,而欧盟倾向于使用更多的否认资源来展示观点。否认资源中,欧盟使用的反驳资源和否定资源均高于中国,宣告资源中,欧盟使用的宣布资源频率比中国高,但否认资源中,中国高于欧盟。话语扩展层面,中欧使用的包容资源都多于归属资源,且欧盟使用的包容资源频率高于中国,其原因可以归结于不同的政治体制、文化历史与媒监管境多方面。本研究丰富了基于评价理论的新闻话语对比分析的研究对象和研究语料,为介入系统理论框架的应用提供新的实践范例,帮助读者从评价理论的角度理解能源报道的更深层次的意义,唤起公众对能源和环境问题的关注。Energy is a vital driving force in the process of globalization and is related to the economic, political and strategic security of countries. China and the European Union have lots of opportunities to cooperate on energy issues. Based on Martin’s appraisal theory, this paper selected English reports on energy and environment from mainstream media in China and the European Union as the Corpus. UAM Corpus Tool3.3 software was used to manually annotate engagement system in the corpus. After data standardization and difference test, it was found that engagement resources were used more frequently in the European Union and the selection types were more diverse. At the level of dialogic contraction, the frequency of disclaim resources used by China is similar to that of proclaim resources, while the EU tends to use more disclaim resources to show different views. Among the disclaim resources, the EU uses more counter resources and deny resources than China. Among the proclaim resources, the EU uses more pronounce resources than China, but among the disclaim resources, China uses more than the EU. At the level of dialogic expansion, both China and Europe use more entertain resources than attribute resources, and the frequency of entertain resources used by the EU is higher than that of China, which can be attributed to different political systems, cultural history and media regulatory environment. This study has enriched the research objects and research corpus for the comparative analysis of news discourse based on appraisal theory, provided a new practical example for the application of the theoretical framework of engagement system, helped readers to understand the deeper meaning of energy reporting from the perspective of appraisal theory, and aroused the public's attention to energy and environmental issues.展开更多
党的十八大以来,“绿水青山就是金山银山”的理念深入人心,“共抓大保护、不搞大开发”成为了共识。新闻语篇作为大众传播的重要载体,能够传递某种态度、意向和情感,进而影响其认知和行为。本研究从生态话语分析范式切入,对中美新能源...党的十八大以来,“绿水青山就是金山银山”的理念深入人心,“共抓大保护、不搞大开发”成为了共识。新闻语篇作为大众传播的重要载体,能够传递某种态度、意向和情感,进而影响其认知和行为。本研究从生态话语分析范式切入,对中美新能源新闻语篇中的介入资源展开了深入剖析,尝试挖掘并阐发了介入资源的分布情况与折射的生态理念。研究发现:中美都更多地使用了“扩展”资源。并且,中国新能源语篇报道中有益性介入居多,美国新能源新闻语篇中多为破坏性介入。Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the concept of “clear waters and green mountains are as good as mountains of gold and silver” has been deeply popular, and “well-coordinated environmental conservation and avoiding excessive development” has become a consensus. News discourse, as an important carrier of mass communication, can transmit certain attitudes, intentions and emotions, and then affect their cognition and behavior. Starting from the ecological discourse analysis paradigm, this study conducted an in-depth analysis of the engagement system in Chinese and American new energy news discourses, and tried to dig out and explain the distribution of engagement resources and reflected ecological properties. It is found that both China and America use more expansion resources. In addition, most of the Chinese new energy news reports are eco-beneficial engagement, while most of the American new energy news reports are eco-destructive engagement.展开更多
上个世纪90年代马丁等在功能语言学框架下发展起来的评价理论旨在分析语篇构建者在把语篇作为信息传递的符号的同时表达了自身怎样的态度立场,它既是一个分析语言评价潜势意义的系统,又是一种语篇分析的方法。我们认为除了这两个视角和...上个世纪90年代马丁等在功能语言学框架下发展起来的评价理论旨在分析语篇构建者在把语篇作为信息传递的符号的同时表达了自身怎样的态度立场,它既是一个分析语言评价潜势意义的系统,又是一种语篇分析的方法。我们认为除了这两个视角和功能,评价理论还是一种语篇修辞策略。正是基于这个视角,文章借助来自New York Times和China Daily的两篇社论就评价理论中的一个子系统———介入系统来阐述该系统的语篇修辞效果,以说明评价理论在新闻语篇中的修辞重要性。展开更多
文摘能源是全球化进程中至关重要的动力,关系着国家的经济、政治和战略安全。中国与欧盟在能源方面具备广泛合作空间。本文基于马丁的评价理论,选取中国和欧盟主流媒体的能源与环境英文报道为语料,利用UAM Corpus Tool3.3软件对语料中的介入系统进行手工批注,对数据进行标准化及差异性检验后发现,欧盟使用介入资源的频率更高,选择类型更多样。在话语收缩层面,中国使用的否认资源与宣告资源的频率相近,而欧盟倾向于使用更多的否认资源来展示观点。否认资源中,欧盟使用的反驳资源和否定资源均高于中国,宣告资源中,欧盟使用的宣布资源频率比中国高,但否认资源中,中国高于欧盟。话语扩展层面,中欧使用的包容资源都多于归属资源,且欧盟使用的包容资源频率高于中国,其原因可以归结于不同的政治体制、文化历史与媒监管境多方面。本研究丰富了基于评价理论的新闻话语对比分析的研究对象和研究语料,为介入系统理论框架的应用提供新的实践范例,帮助读者从评价理论的角度理解能源报道的更深层次的意义,唤起公众对能源和环境问题的关注。Energy is a vital driving force in the process of globalization and is related to the economic, political and strategic security of countries. China and the European Union have lots of opportunities to cooperate on energy issues. Based on Martin’s appraisal theory, this paper selected English reports on energy and environment from mainstream media in China and the European Union as the Corpus. UAM Corpus Tool3.3 software was used to manually annotate engagement system in the corpus. After data standardization and difference test, it was found that engagement resources were used more frequently in the European Union and the selection types were more diverse. At the level of dialogic contraction, the frequency of disclaim resources used by China is similar to that of proclaim resources, while the EU tends to use more disclaim resources to show different views. Among the disclaim resources, the EU uses more counter resources and deny resources than China. Among the proclaim resources, the EU uses more pronounce resources than China, but among the disclaim resources, China uses more than the EU. At the level of dialogic expansion, both China and Europe use more entertain resources than attribute resources, and the frequency of entertain resources used by the EU is higher than that of China, which can be attributed to different political systems, cultural history and media regulatory environment. This study has enriched the research objects and research corpus for the comparative analysis of news discourse based on appraisal theory, provided a new practical example for the application of the theoretical framework of engagement system, helped readers to understand the deeper meaning of energy reporting from the perspective of appraisal theory, and aroused the public's attention to energy and environmental issues.
文摘党的十八大以来,“绿水青山就是金山银山”的理念深入人心,“共抓大保护、不搞大开发”成为了共识。新闻语篇作为大众传播的重要载体,能够传递某种态度、意向和情感,进而影响其认知和行为。本研究从生态话语分析范式切入,对中美新能源新闻语篇中的介入资源展开了深入剖析,尝试挖掘并阐发了介入资源的分布情况与折射的生态理念。研究发现:中美都更多地使用了“扩展”资源。并且,中国新能源语篇报道中有益性介入居多,美国新能源新闻语篇中多为破坏性介入。Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the concept of “clear waters and green mountains are as good as mountains of gold and silver” has been deeply popular, and “well-coordinated environmental conservation and avoiding excessive development” has become a consensus. News discourse, as an important carrier of mass communication, can transmit certain attitudes, intentions and emotions, and then affect their cognition and behavior. Starting from the ecological discourse analysis paradigm, this study conducted an in-depth analysis of the engagement system in Chinese and American new energy news discourses, and tried to dig out and explain the distribution of engagement resources and reflected ecological properties. It is found that both China and America use more expansion resources. In addition, most of the Chinese new energy news reports are eco-beneficial engagement, while most of the American new energy news reports are eco-destructive engagement.
文摘上个世纪90年代马丁等在功能语言学框架下发展起来的评价理论旨在分析语篇构建者在把语篇作为信息传递的符号的同时表达了自身怎样的态度立场,它既是一个分析语言评价潜势意义的系统,又是一种语篇分析的方法。我们认为除了这两个视角和功能,评价理论还是一种语篇修辞策略。正是基于这个视角,文章借助来自New York Times和China Daily的两篇社论就评价理论中的一个子系统———介入系统来阐述该系统的语篇修辞效果,以说明评价理论在新闻语篇中的修辞重要性。
