Objective： The current study was prospectively designed to explore the application of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery （VATS） radical treatment for patients with stage ⅢA lung cancer, with the primary endpoint...Objective： The current study was prospectively designed to explore the application of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery （VATS） radical treatment for patients with stage ⅢA lung cancer, with the primary endpoints being the safety and feasibility of this operation and the second endpoints being the survival and complications after the surgery. Methods： A total of 51 patients with radiologically or mediastinoscopically confirmed stage ⅢA lung cancer underwent VATS radical treatment, during which the standard pulmonary lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection were performed after pre-operative assessment. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss/ complications, postoperative recovery, postoperative complications, and lymph node dissection were recorded and analyzed. This study was regarded as successful if the surgical success rate reached 90% or higher. Results： A total of 51 patients with non-small cell lung cancer （NSCLC） were enrolled in this study from March 2009 to February 2010. The median post-operative follow-up duration was 50.5 months. Of these 51 patients, 41 （80.4%） had N2 lymph node metastases. All patients underwent the thoracoscopic surgeries, among whom 50 （98%） received pulmonary lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection completely under the thoracoscope, 6 had their incisions extended to about 6 cm due to larger tumor sizes, and 1 had his surgery performed using a 12 cm small incision for handling the adhesions between lymph nodes and blood vessels. No patient was converted to conventional open thoracotomy. No perioperative death was noted. One patient received a second surgery on the second post-operative day due to large drainage （〉1,000 mL）, and the postoperative recovery was satisfactory. Up to 45 patients （88.2%） did not suffer from any perioperative complication, and 6 （11.8%） experienced one or more complications. Conclusions： VATS radical treatment is a safe and feasible treatment for stage ⅢA lung cancer.展开更多
目的对比淋巴结采样(LN-S)和肺叶特异性淋巴结清扫(L-SLD)治疗早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的临床疗效和安全性。方法计算机检索Pub Med、Medline、EMbase、Web of Science和The Cochrane Library(2017年2期)数据库公开发表的英文文献,搜集...目的对比淋巴结采样(LN-S)和肺叶特异性淋巴结清扫(L-SLD)治疗早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的临床疗效和安全性。方法计算机检索Pub Med、Medline、EMbase、Web of Science和The Cochrane Library(2017年2期)数据库公开发表的英文文献,搜集系统性纵隔淋巴结清扫(SMLD)与LN-S或L-SLD治疗NSCLC的随机对照试验(RCT)和队列研究(CS),检索时间均为建库至2017年3月。由2位评价员独立筛选文献、提取资料和评价纳入研究的偏倚风险后,采用Rev Man 5.3软件进行直接Meta分析,采用ITC软件进行间接Meta分析。结果共纳入文献18篇,包括4篇RCT和14篇CS,共10 714例患者。直接Meta分析结果表明:CS中与SMLD组相比,L-SLD延长了总生存期,但差异无统计学意义[HR=0.99,95%CI(0.78,1.25),P=0.92],LN-S组总生存期缩短,差异有统计学意义[HR=1.43,95%CI(1.17,1.75),P=0.000 4],但在RCT中差异无统计学意义(P=0.35)。CS中无病生存期SMLD组和LN-S组[HR=1.25,95%CI(0.96,1.62),P=0.10]、L-SLD组[HR=1.15,95%CI(0.92,1.43),P=0.23]差异均无统计学意义。在局部复发率和远处转移率方面,与非系统性淋巴结清扫(NSMLD)相比,SMLD在CS和RCT中差异均无统计学意义(CS:P=0.43,P=0.39;RCT:P=0.24,P=0.10);术后并发症在CS[OR=0.79,95%CI(0.58,1.09),P=0.15]和RCT[OR=0.36,95%CI(0.09,1.45),P=0.15]中差异亦无统计学意义。间接Meta分析显示,与LN-S组相比,L-SLD组死亡风险降低了31%[HR=0.69,95%CI(0.51,0.95),P=0.46],复发风险降低了35%[HR=0.65,95%CI(0.65,1.30),P=0.72],但差异无统计学意义。结论对于早期NSCLC,与L-SLD相比SMLD在生存获益方面差异无统计学意义;而LN-S的总生存期短于SMLD。间接Meta分析显示相比LN-S组,L-SLD组降低死亡风险和复发风险,然而两者的预后尚无直接比较的证据支持,仍需要更进一步的前瞻性研究予以验证。展开更多
文摘Objective： The current study was prospectively designed to explore the application of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery （VATS） radical treatment for patients with stage ⅢA lung cancer, with the primary endpoints being the safety and feasibility of this operation and the second endpoints being the survival and complications after the surgery. Methods： A total of 51 patients with radiologically or mediastinoscopically confirmed stage ⅢA lung cancer underwent VATS radical treatment, during which the standard pulmonary lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection were performed after pre-operative assessment. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss/ complications, postoperative recovery, postoperative complications, and lymph node dissection were recorded and analyzed. This study was regarded as successful if the surgical success rate reached 90% or higher. Results： A total of 51 patients with non-small cell lung cancer （NSCLC） were enrolled in this study from March 2009 to February 2010. The median post-operative follow-up duration was 50.5 months. Of these 51 patients, 41 （80.4%） had N2 lymph node metastases. All patients underwent the thoracoscopic surgeries, among whom 50 （98%） received pulmonary lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection completely under the thoracoscope, 6 had their incisions extended to about 6 cm due to larger tumor sizes, and 1 had his surgery performed using a 12 cm small incision for handling the adhesions between lymph nodes and blood vessels. No patient was converted to conventional open thoracotomy. No perioperative death was noted. One patient received a second surgery on the second post-operative day due to large drainage （〉1,000 mL）, and the postoperative recovery was satisfactory. Up to 45 patients （88.2%） did not suffer from any perioperative complication, and 6 （11.8%） experienced one or more complications. Conclusions： VATS radical treatment is a safe and feasible treatment for stage ⅢA lung cancer.
文摘目的对比淋巴结采样(LN-S)和肺叶特异性淋巴结清扫(L-SLD)治疗早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的临床疗效和安全性。方法计算机检索Pub Med、Medline、EMbase、Web of Science和The Cochrane Library(2017年2期)数据库公开发表的英文文献,搜集系统性纵隔淋巴结清扫(SMLD)与LN-S或L-SLD治疗NSCLC的随机对照试验(RCT)和队列研究(CS),检索时间均为建库至2017年3月。由2位评价员独立筛选文献、提取资料和评价纳入研究的偏倚风险后,采用Rev Man 5.3软件进行直接Meta分析,采用ITC软件进行间接Meta分析。结果共纳入文献18篇,包括4篇RCT和14篇CS,共10 714例患者。直接Meta分析结果表明:CS中与SMLD组相比,L-SLD延长了总生存期,但差异无统计学意义[HR=0.99,95%CI(0.78,1.25),P=0.92],LN-S组总生存期缩短,差异有统计学意义[HR=1.43,95%CI(1.17,1.75),P=0.000 4],但在RCT中差异无统计学意义(P=0.35)。CS中无病生存期SMLD组和LN-S组[HR=1.25,95%CI(0.96,1.62),P=0.10]、L-SLD组[HR=1.15,95%CI(0.92,1.43),P=0.23]差异均无统计学意义。在局部复发率和远处转移率方面,与非系统性淋巴结清扫(NSMLD)相比,SMLD在CS和RCT中差异均无统计学意义(CS:P=0.43,P=0.39;RCT:P=0.24,P=0.10);术后并发症在CS[OR=0.79,95%CI(0.58,1.09),P=0.15]和RCT[OR=0.36,95%CI(0.09,1.45),P=0.15]中差异亦无统计学意义。间接Meta分析显示,与LN-S组相比,L-SLD组死亡风险降低了31%[HR=0.69,95%CI(0.51,0.95),P=0.46],复发风险降低了35%[HR=0.65,95%CI(0.65,1.30),P=0.72],但差异无统计学意义。结论对于早期NSCLC,与L-SLD相比SMLD在生存获益方面差异无统计学意义;而LN-S的总生存期短于SMLD。间接Meta分析显示相比LN-S组,L-SLD组降低死亡风险和复发风险,然而两者的预后尚无直接比较的证据支持,仍需要更进一步的前瞻性研究予以验证。
