This study examines the pivotal findings of the network meta-analysis of Zhou et al,which evaluated the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and combination therapies for advanced hepatocellular carcinom...This study examines the pivotal findings of the network meta-analysis of Zhou et al,which evaluated the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and combination therapies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).This meta-analysis suggests that therapeutic combinations have greater efficacy than do standard treatments.The article highlights the key insights that have the potential to shift current clinical practice and enhance outcomes for patients with advanced HCC.Additionally,this article discusses further research that can be conducted to optimize these treatments and achieve personalized care for patients with HCC.展开更多
Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is an advanced targeted therapeuticapproach for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common type ofprimary liver cancer. HAIC has demonstrated significant potential in...Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is an advanced targeted therapeuticapproach for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common type ofprimary liver cancer. HAIC has demonstrated significant potential in managingadvanced HCC, particularly in regions with high prevalence rates. Despite itspromise, several challenges and areas for future research remain. Clinical studieshave substantiated the efficacy of HAIC in enhancing survival outcomes forpatients with advanced hepatic carcinoma. Notably, combination therapiesinvolving immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as lenvatinib and programmeddeath-1 inhibitors, have shown substantial improvements in median overallsurvival and progression-free survival compared to systemic chemotherapy.These combination therapies have also exhibited superior response rates anddisease control, with manageable and often less severe adverse events relative tosystemic treatments. This article is based on the review by Zhou et al and aims todiscuss the current status and future directions in the treatment of HCC, emphasizingthe role of HAIC and its integration with novel therapeutic agents.展开更多
Hepatic arterial infusion(HAI)chemotherapy,first introduced in the 1980s,has gained recognition as an effective locoregional treatment for colorectal liver metastasis(CRLM).Initially used for unresectable liver metast...Hepatic arterial infusion(HAI)chemotherapy,first introduced in the 1980s,has gained recognition as an effective locoregional treatment for colorectal liver metastasis(CRLM).Initially used for unresectable liver metastases,HAI’s app-lication has expanded to the adjuvant setting following hepatic resection,with early studies indicating improved hepatic disease-free survival.Recent research demonstrates that combining HAI with modern systemic therapies enhances conversion to resectability and prolongs both recurrence-free and overall survival,even in heavily pretreated patients with diverse RAS mutational statuses.Person-alization through approaches like microsatellite instability status and dose mo-difications further optimize outcomes.However,the complexity of HAI requires expertise across multidisciplinary teams,limiting its widespread adoption to specialized centers.Ongoing clinical trials continue to investigate HAI’s role in CRLM management,highlighting its potential to become a cornerstone of liver-directed therapy.We explore how HAI chemotherapy,in combination with personalized medicine,can advance treatment strategies for metastatic colorectal cancer.展开更多
The rapid evolution of systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),one of the most common types of liver cancer,has attracted significant attention especially to hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)as...The rapid evolution of systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),one of the most common types of liver cancer,has attracted significant attention especially to hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)as a highly promising treatment approach.This method,which delivers chemotherapy directly into the liver's arterial supply,is designed to maximize the concentration of anti-cancer drugs at the tumor site while minimizing systemic side effects.Despite the potential and the encouraging results observed in various studies,HAIC has not yet achieved widespread acceptance and utilization.Sorafenib is a widely used systemic therapy that targets multiple pathways involved in tumor growth and angiogenesis,while transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)is a locoregional therapy that combines arterial embolization with chemotherapy.These treatments have been the mainstay of HCC management,yet they have limitations that HAIC may potentially overcome.This article specifically comments on the network meta-analysis that examined the current research status of HAIC,highlighting its effectiveness and safety profile in comparison to established standard treatments such as Sorafenib and TACE.Through an extensive review of existing studies,the authors conclude that patients receiving HAIC often experience better survival rates and longer periods without disease progression compared to those receiving Sorafenib or TACE.展开更多
This article provides an in-depth analysis of the study conducted by Wang et al,which explores hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and its synergistic strategies in managing advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).H...This article provides an in-depth analysis of the study conducted by Wang et al,which explores hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and its synergistic strategies in managing advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).HCC ranks as the fourth most common cause of cancer-related mortality globally and is frequently associated with portal vein tumor thrombus(PVTT).The approach to managing HCC,particularly when PVTT is present,diverges markedly between Eastern and Western practices.These differences are rooted in variations in epidemiology,etiology,pathology,comorbidities,and prognosis.The paper delves into the diagnosis,classification,and treatment strategies for HCC with PVTT,as well as the evolving role and advancements of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in the therapeutic landscape of HCC.展开更多
BACKGROUND With the rapid progress of systematic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),therapeutic strategies combining hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)with systematic therapy arised increasing concent...BACKGROUND With the rapid progress of systematic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),therapeutic strategies combining hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)with systematic therapy arised increasing concentrations.However,there have been no systematic review comparing HAIC and its combination strategies in the first-line treatment for advanced HCC.AIM To investigate the efficacy and safety of HAIC and its combination therapies for advanced HCC.METHODS A network meta-analysis was performed by including 9 randomized controlled trails and 35 cohort studies to carry out our study.The outcomes of interest comprised overall survival(OS),progression-free survival(PFS),tumor response and adverse events.Hazard ratios(HR)and odds ratios(OR)with a 95% confidence interval(CI)were calculated and agents were ranked based on their ranking probability.RESULTS HAIC outperformed Sorafenib(HR=0.55,95%CI:0.42-0.72;HR=0.51,95%CI:0.33-0.78;OR=2.86,95%CI:1.37-5.98;OR=5.45,95%CI:3.57-8.30;OR=7.15,95%CI:4.06-12.58;OR=2.89,95%CI:1.99-4.19;OR=0.48,95%CI:0.25-0.92,respectively)and transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)(HR=0.50,95%CI:0.33-0.75;HR=0.62,95%CI:0.39-0.98;OR=3.08,95%CI:1.36-6.98;OR=2.07,95%CI:1.54-2.80;OR=3.16,95%CI:1.71-5.85;OR=2.67,95%CI:1.59-4.50;OR=0.16,95%CI:0.05-0.54,respectively)in terms of efficacy and safety.HAIC+lenvatinib+ablation,HAIC+ablation,HAIC+anti-programmed cell death 1(PD-1),and HAIC+radiotherapy had the higher likelihood of providing better OS and PFS outcomes compared to HAIC alone.HAIC+TACE+S-1,HAIC+lenvatinib,HAIC+PD-1,HAIC+TACE,and HAIC+sorafenib had the higher likelihood of providing better partial response and objective response rate outcomes compared to HAIC.HAIC+PD-1,HAIC+TACE+S-1 and HAIC+TACE had the higher likelihood of providing better complete response and disease control rate outcomes compared to HAIC alone.CONCLUSION HAIC proved more effective and safer than sorafenib and TACE.Furthermore,combined with other interventions,HAIC showed improved efficacy over HAIC monotherapy according to the treatment ranking analysis.展开更多
BACKGROUND Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)has been proven to be an ideal choice for treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma(uHCC).HAIC-based treatment showed great potential for treating uHCC.Howev...BACKGROUND Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)has been proven to be an ideal choice for treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma(uHCC).HAIC-based treatment showed great potential for treating uHCC.However,large-scale studies on HAIC-based treatments and meta-analyses of first-line treatments for uHCC are lacking.AIM To investigate better first-line treatment options for uHCC and to assess the safety and efficacy of HAIC combined with angiogenesis inhibitors,programmed cell death of protein 1(PD-1)and its ligand(PD-L1)blockers(triple therapy)under real-world conditions.METHODS Several electronic databases were searched to identify eligible randomized controlled trials for this meta-analysis.Study-level pooled analyses of hazard ratios(HRs)and odds ratios(ORs)were performed.This was a retrospective single-center study involving 442 patients with uHCC who received triple therapy or angiogenesis inhibitors plus PD-1/PD-L1 blockades(AIPB)at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from January 2018 to April 2023.Propensity score matching(PSM)was performed to balance the bias between the groups.The Kaplan-Meier method and cox regression were used to analyse the survival data,and the log-rank test was used to compare the suvival time between the groups.RESULTS A total of 13 randomized controlled trials were included.HAIC alone and in combination with sorafenib were found to be effective treatments(P values for ORs:HAIC,0.95;for HRs:HAIC+sorafenib,0.04).After PSM,176 HCC patients were included in the analysis.The triple therapy group(n=88)had a longer median overall survival than the AIPB group(n=88)(31.6 months vs 14.6 months,P<0.001)and a greater incidence of adverse events(94.3%vs 75.4%,P<0.001).CONCLUSION This meta-analysis suggests that HAIC-based treatments are likely to be the best choice for uHCC.Our findings confirm that triple therapy is more effective for uHCC patients than AIPB.展开更多
Newer systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)have led to growing interest in combining hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)with systemic treatments.To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of HAIC...Newer systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)have led to growing interest in combining hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)with systemic treatments.To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of HAIC and combination therapies in treating advanced HCC,a network meta-analysis was conducted by Zhou et al.The study included data from 44 articles.HAIC was superior in overall survival(OS),progression-free survival(PFS),and response rates compared to transarterial chemoembolization and sorafenib.Moreover,combinations of HAIC with other treatments and single agents(e.g.,lenvatinib,ablation,anti-programmed cell death 1 therapy,radiotherapy)provided better OS and PFS outcomes than HAIC alone.In this editorial,we will discuss the study findings,the strengths and weaknesses of the metanalysis,and future advances in the field of HAIC for advanced HCC.展开更多
Hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)remains a major challenge in oncology,being a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide.Early-stage HCC is typically treated with surgical resection,transplantation,or ablation,w...Hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)remains a major challenge in oncology,being a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide.Early-stage HCC is typically treated with surgical resection,transplantation,or ablation,while advanced-stage HCC relies on systemic therapies like sorafenib and newer combinations such as atezolizumab-bevacizumab.Despite these advancements,there is still a need for effective treatments for unresectable HCC,especially in cases with macroscopic vascular invasion.Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)has demonstrated promising outcomes in Asia for the treatment of unresectable HCC,yet its application in Western countries has been relatively limited.This letter reviews the recent meta-analysis by Zhou et al published in the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology,which demonstrates the efficacy and safety of HAIC vs sorafenib.The analysis includes 9 randomized controlled trials and 35 cohort studies,highlighting significant improvements in overall survival,progressionfree survival,and objective response rates with HAIC and its combinations.The editorial explores the reasons behind the limited use of HAIC in Western countries.It underscores the potential of HAIC to enhance treatment outcomes for advanced HCC and calls for more research and broader adoption of HAIC in clinical practice globally.展开更多
Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)has good clinical efficacy in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC);however,its efficacy varies.This review summarized the ability of various markers to pred...Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)has good clinical efficacy in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC);however,its efficacy varies.This review summarized the ability of various markers to predict the efficacy of HAIC and provided a reference for clinical applications.As of October 25,2023,51 articles have been retrieved based on keyword predictions and HAIC.Sixteen eligible articles were selected for inclusion in this study.Comprehensive literature analysis found that methods used to predict the efficacy of HAIC include serological testing,gene testing,and imaging testing.The above indicators and their combined forms showed excellent predictive effects in retrospective studies.This review summarized the strategies currently used to predict the efficacy of HAIC in middle and advanced HCC,analyzed each marker's ability to predict HAIC efficacy,and provided a reference for the clinical application of the prediction system.展开更多
BACKGROUND There is little evidence of combining sorafenib with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)after transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)for intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).It is ...BACKGROUND There is little evidence of combining sorafenib with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)after transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)for intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).It is important to identify that patients with intermediate and advanced HCC are most likely to benefit from this combination therapy.AIM To investigate the safety and clinical outcomes of sorafenib combined with HAIC with folinic acid,5-fluorouracil(5-FU),and oxaliplatin(FOLFOX)after TACE for intermediate and advanced HCC.METHODS This prospective phase II study enrolled patients with intermediate and advanced HCC who underwent treatment with sorafenib combined with TACEHAIC.All patients initially received the standard 400 mg dose of sorafenib twice daily before TACE-HAIC.Participants at our institute with intermediate and advanced HCC underwent routine TACE.Then,the catheter used for embolization was kept in place in the hepatic artery,and oxaliplatin was intraarterially administered for 6 h,followed by 5-FU for 18 h,and folinic acid was intravenously administered for 2 h.The primary endpoints were safety,as evaluated by the Common Terminology and Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0,and 12-mo progression-free survival(PFS),as analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method.As secondary endpoints,the objective response rate(ORR)was evaluated by the modified Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors,and survival time[overall survival(OS)]was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method.RESULTS Sixty-six participants at our institute with intermediate and advanced HCC were enrolled in this prospective study(mean age,53.3±11.7 years).Approximately 56.1%of participants had Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer(BCLC)stage C disease,and 43.9%had BCLC stage B disease.The ORR was 42.4%.The disease control rate was 87.9%.The grade 3-4 toxicities consisted of thrombocytopenia(4.5%),neutropenia(3.0%),and elevated aspartate aminotransferase(12.2%).Hand-foot skin reaction was also observed(40.9%).The median PFS was 13.1 mo(13.5 mo in the BCLC stage B participants and 9.4 mo in the BCLC stage C participants).The 6-mo,12-mo,and 24-mo PFS rates were 75.0%,54.7%,and 30.0%,respectively.The median OS was 21.8 mo.CONCLUSION Sorafenib combined with HAIC(FOLFOX)after TACE may be a feasible treatment choice for intermediate and advanced HCC because this treatment met the prespecified endpoint of a 6-mo PFS rate exceeding 50%and had good patient tolerance.Prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the effect of this combination therapy.展开更多
AIM:To evaluate the effectiveness of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) resistant to transarterial chemoembolization(TACE).METHODS:This study was conducted on 42 pa...AIM:To evaluate the effectiveness of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) resistant to transarterial chemoembolization(TACE).METHODS:This study was conducted on 42 patients who received HAIC for advanced HCC between 2001and 2010 at our hospital.5-fluorouracil(5-FU) was administered continuously for 24 h from day 1 to day 5 every 2-4 wk via an injection reservoir.Intra-arterial cisplatin or subcutaneous interferon was administered in combination with the 5-FU.The patients enrolled in this retrospective study were divided into two groups according to whether or not they fulfilled the criteria for resistance to TACE proposed by the Japan Society of Hepatology in 2010(written in Japanese);one group of patients who did not fulfill the criteria for TACE resistance(group A,n = 23),and another group who fulfilled the criteria for TACE resistance(group B,n = 19).We compared the outcomes in terms of the response and survival rates between the two groups.RESULTS:Both the response rate and tumor suppression rate following HAIC were significantly superior in group A than in group B(response rate:48% vs 16%,P = 0.028,tumor suppression rate:87% vs 53%,P = 0.014).Furthermore,both the progression-free survival rate and survival time were significantly superior in group A than in group B(3-,6-,12-,and 24-mo = 83%,70%,29% and 20% vs 63%,42%,16% and 0%,respectively,P = 0.040,and 9.8 mo vs 6.2 mo,P = 0.040).A multivariate analysis(Cox proportional hazards regression model) showed that resistance to TACE was an independent predictor of poor survival(P = 0.007).CONCLUSION:HAIC administrating 5-FU was not effective against advanced HCC resistant to TACE.Other tools for treatment,i.e.,molecular-targeting agents may be considered for these cases.展开更多
AIM:To investigate the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC) using floxuridine(FUDR) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) confined to the liver.METHODS:Thirty-four patients who ha...AIM:To investigate the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC) using floxuridine(FUDR) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) confined to the liver.METHODS:Thirty-four patients who had advanced HCC with unresectability or unsuccessful previous therapy in the absence of extrahepatic metastasis were treated with intra-arterial FUDR chemotherapy at ourhospital between March 2005 and May 2008.Among the 34 patients,9 patients were classified as Child class C,and 18 patients had portal vein tumor thrombus(PVTT).One course of chemotherapy consisted of continuous infusion of FUDR(0.3 mg/kg during day 1-14) and dexamethasone(10 mg on day 1,4,7 and 11),and this treatment was repeated every 28 d.RESULTS:Two patients(5.9%) displayed a complete response,and 12 patients(35.3%) had a partial response.The tumor control rate was 61.8%.The median overall survival times were 15.3 mo,12.4 mo and 4.3 mo for the patients who were classified as Child class A,Child class B and Child class C,respectively(P = 0.0392).The progression-free survival was 12.9 mo,7.7 mo and 2.6 mo for the patients who were classified as Child class A,Child class B and Child class C,respectively(P = 0.0443).The cumulative survival differed significantly according to the Child-Pugh classification and the presence of PVTT.In addition to hepatic reserve capacity and PVTT,the extent of HCC was an independent factor in determining a poor prognosis.The most common adverse reactions to HAIC were mucositis,diarrhea and peptic ulcer disease,but most of these complications were improved by medical treatment and/or a delay of HAIC.CONCLUSION:The present study demonstrates that intra-arterial FUDR chemotherapy is a safe and effective treatment for advanced HCC that is recalcitrant to other therapeutic modalities,even in patients with advanced cirrhosis.展开更多
BACKGROUND Transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)have shown promising local benefits for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).S-1,a composite preparation of a 5-fluorou...BACKGROUND Transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)have shown promising local benefits for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).S-1,a composite preparation of a 5-fluorouracil prodrug,has proven to be a convenient oral chemotherapeutic agent with definite efficacy against advanced HCC.AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE followed by HAIC with or without oral S-1 for treating advanced HCC.METHODS In this single-center,open-label,prospective,randomized controlled trial,117 participants with advanced HCC were randomized to receive TACE followed by oxaliplatin-based HAIC either with(TACE/HAIC+S-1,n=56)or without(TACE/HAIC,n=61)oral S-1 between December 2013 and September 2017.Two participants were excluded from final analysis for withdrawing consent.The primary endpoint was progression-free survival(PFS)and secondary endpoints included overall survival(OS),objective response rate,disease control rate and safety.RESULTS In total,115 participants(100 males and 15 females;mean age,57.7 years±11.9)were analyzed.The median PFS and OS were 5.0 mo(0.4–58.6 mo)(95%confidence interval(CI):3.82 to 6.18)vs 4.4 mo(1.1–54.4 mo)(95%CI:2.54 to 6.26;P=0.585)and 8.4 mo(0.4–58.6 mo)(95%CI:6.88 to 9.92)vs 8.3 mo(1.4–54.4 m)(95%CI:5.71 to 10.96;P=0.985)in the TACE/HAIC+S-1 and TACE/HAIC groups,respectively.The objective response rate and disease control rate were 30.9%vs 18.4%and 72.7%vs 56.7%in the TACE/HAIC+S-1 and TACE/HAIC groups,respectively.Grade 3/4 adverse events had a similar frequency in both treatment groups.CONCLUSION No improvements in tumor response rates,PFS or OS were observed with the addition of S-1 to TACE/HAIC in advanced HCC.Both treatment regimens had a similar safety profile.展开更多
Objective:This study aimed to introduce and evaluate a new embolization technique for the right gastric artery(RGA) during percutaneous implantation of a port-catheter system for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy...Objective:This study aimed to introduce and evaluate a new embolization technique for the right gastric artery(RGA) during percutaneous implantation of a port-catheter system for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC).Methods:From January 2013 to January 2017,159 patients with unresectable advanced liver cancer underwent percutaneous implantation of a port-catheter system.In 86 of these patients(56 men;aged 28-88 years;mean:60.6±12.0 years),in whom the RGA was obvious on arteriography,embolization of RGA was attempted using microcoils to protect the gastric mucosa during HAIC.In the first phase(first three years),antegrade embolization of the RGA using a 2.7 Fr microcatheter was performed in 55 patients.In the second phase(next two years),embolization of the RGA was attempted by combining antegrade embolization and retrograde embolization through the left gastric artery(LGA) in 31 patients.The success rates and the incidence of acute gastroduodenal mucosal toxicity(AGMT) in these two groups were compared.Results:The total success rate of the RGA embolization was 70.9%.The success rate was 83.9% in 31 patients who underwent combined antegrade and retrograde embolization,which was significantly higher than that of antegrade embolization alone(63.6%) performed in 55 patients(p=0.047).No complications related to embolization of RGA were documented.The incidence of AGMT was 29.1%(16/55) in patients in the first phase,which was significantly higher than that in the patients in the second phase(9.7%,3/31)(p=0.037).Conclusion: A combination of retrograde embolization via LGA could increase the success rates of RGA embolization and reduce the incidence of AGMT after HAIC.展开更多
Objective:To study the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion of Endostatin(YH-16,Endostar),combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE) on advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.Methods:Thirty pa...Objective:To study the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion of Endostatin(YH-16,Endostar),combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE) on advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.Methods:Thirty patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma were enrolled in the study.The patients received hepatic arterial infusion of Endostar combined with TACE.The efficacy was evaluated strictly after 1-2 cycles according to RECIST criteria and the value of AFP;quality of life(QOL) was evaluated according to Karnofsky scores.Adverse effects were evaluated too.Results:29 cases' efficacy was evaluated among the total 30 cases.The KPS were significantly increased after the treatment(80.39 ± 8.37 vs 73.93 ± 9.22,P = 0.002).Compared with control group,the objective response rate(CR and PR) and the rate of AFP negative changed were significantly higher(P = 0.021,P = 0.046).The adverse effects were not obvious.Conclusion:The QOL and preliminary efficiency of patients of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma may be improved by hepatic arterial infusion of Endostar combined with TACE,the rate of AFP negative changed were significantly higher too,and there are little of adverse effects.It is worthy to clinical generalization and further clinical observation.展开更多
BACKGROUND Recently,hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)plus lenvatinib has been frequently used to treat unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma(uHCC)in China.In the clinic,the hepatic arteries of some patients...BACKGROUND Recently,hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)plus lenvatinib has been frequently used to treat unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma(uHCC)in China.In the clinic,the hepatic arteries of some patients shrink significantly during this treatment,leading to improved short-term efficacy.AIM To investigate the relationship between the shrinkage of hepatic arteries and the short-term effect of HAIC plus lenvatinib treatment.METHODS Sixty-seven participants with uHCC were enrolled in this retrospective study.The patients received HAIC every 3 wk,followed by oral lenvatinib after the first HAIC course.Hepatic artery diameters were measured on CT before treatment and after 1 and 2 mo of treatment.Meanwhile,the changes in tumor capillaries were also examined on pathological specimens before and after 1 mo of treatment.The antitumor response after 1,3,and 6 mo of treatment was assessed using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors(mRECIST).The relationship between the changes in vessel diameters and the short-term effect of the combination treatment was evaluated by receiver-operating characteristic and logistic regression analyses.RESULTS The hepatic artery diameters were all significantly decreased after 1 and 2 mo of treatment(P<0.001),but there was no difference in the vessel diameters between 1 and 2 mo(P>0.05).The microvessel density in the tumor lesions decreased significantly after 1 mo of combination treatment(P<0.001).According to mRECIST,46,41,and 24 patients had complete or partial responses after 1,3,and 6 mo of treatment,respectively,whereas 21,21,and 32 patients had a stable or progressive disease at these times,respectively.Shrinkage of the tumor-feeding artery was significantly associated with the tumor response after 1,3,and 6 mo of treatment(P<0.001,P=0.004,and P=0.023,respectively);however,changes in other hepatic arteries were not significantly associated with the tumor response.Furthermore,shrinkage of the tumor-feeding artery was an independent factor for treatment efficacy(P=0.001,P=0.001,and P=0.002 and 1,3,and 6 mo,respectively).CONCLUSION The hepatic arteries shrank rapidly after treatment with HAIC plus lenvatinib,and shrinkage of the tumor-feeding artery diameter was closely related to improved short-term efficacy.展开更多
Objective： To investigate the prognostic factors in chemorefractory colorectal cancer liver metastasis（CRCLM）patients treated by transarterial chemoembolization（TACE） and sustained hepatic arterial infusion chemo...Objective： To investigate the prognostic factors in chemorefractory colorectal cancer liver metastasis（CRCLM）patients treated by transarterial chemoembolization（TACE） and sustained hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy（HAIC）.Methods： Between 2006 and 2015, 162 patients who underwent 763 TACE and HAIC in total were enrolled in this retrospective study, including 110 males and 52 females, with a median age of 60（range, 26–83） years.Prognostic factors were assessed with Log-rank test, Cox univariate and multivariate analyses.Results： The median survival time（MST） and median progression-free survival（PFS） of the 162 patients from first TACE/HAIC were 15.6 months and 5.5 months respectively. Normal serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9（CA19-9, 〈37 U/m L）（P〈0.001） and carbohydrate antigen 72-4（CA72-4, 〈6.7 U/m L）（P=0.026）, combination with other local treatment（liver radiotherapy or liver radiofrequency ablation）（P=0.034） and response to TACE/HAIC（P〈0.001） were significant factors related to survival after TACE/HAIC in univariate analysis. A multivariate analysis revealed that normal serum CA19-9（P〈0.001）, response to TACE/HAIC（P〈0.001） and combination with other local treatment（P=0.001） were independent factors among them.Conclusions： Our findings indicate that serum CA19-9 〈37 U/m L and response to TACE/HAIC are significant prognostic indicators for this combined treatment, and treated with other local treatment could reach a considerable survival benefit for CRCLM. This could be useful for making decisions regarding the treatment of CRCLM.展开更多
In this manuscript,we comment on the article by Zhou et al,who assessed the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)and its combination strategies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)using networ...In this manuscript,we comment on the article by Zhou et al,who assessed the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)and its combination strategies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)using network metaanalysis methodology.We focus specifically on the potential advantages and role of HAIC in the treatment algorithm for advanced HCC.However,there remains numerous knowledge gaps before the role of HAIC can be established.There is significant heterogeneity of HAIC regimes with difficult interpretation of the clinical outcomes.Additionally,there is a lack of direct comparative data between HAIC,systemic chemotherapy,novel immunotherapies and targeted therapies.The underlying biochemical mechanisms that might explain the efficacy of HAIC and its effect on the HCC microenvironment requires further research.In the developing era of nanotechnology and targeted drug delivery systems,there is potential for integration of HAIC with novel technologies to effectively treat advanced HCC whilst minimising systemic complications.展开更多
BACKGROUND Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)is a widely used local therapeutic approach for intermediate to advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),exhibiting considerable efficacy.However,the prevalence...BACKGROUND Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)is a widely used local therapeutic approach for intermediate to advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),exhibiting considerable efficacy.However,the prevalence of postoperative pain highlights the importance of pain management.Owing to the limitations inherent in existing pain management strategies,this study investigates and assesses the analgesic effectiveness of a multimodal treatment protocol in mitigating pain after HAIC procedures.AIM To provide patients with a more comprehensive and effective pain management strategy.METHODS A total of 100 patients with primary HCC who underwent HAIC were randomly assigned to a control group(n=50)and a multimodal group(n=50).Baseline characteristics and perioperative data were collected.Upon enrollment,patients in the multimodal group received parecoxib(40 mg)30 minutes before HAIC,followed by 48 hours of patient-controlled analgesia with sufentanil.In contrast,the control group underwent standard preoperative preparation(psychological support)and received dezocine(5 mg)intraoperatively,with intravenous flurbiprofen(100 mg)administered every 12 hours for 48 hours postoperatively.RESULTS Compared to the control group,the multimodal analgesia group exhibited significantly lower resting and movement visual analog scale pain scores at postoperative 0,2,4,6,and 12 hours(P<0.05).Furthermore,the multimodal group experienced a reduced incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting,as well as a lower overall frequency of adverse events,compared to the control group(P<0.05).Patient satisfaction was also significantly higher in the multimodal group than in the control group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Our study demonstrates that multimodal analgesia is effective in reducing postoperative pain,minimizing adverse reactions,and improving patient satisfaction in HCC patients undergoing HAIC.This approach provides valuable clinical strategies for optimizing pain management in this patient population.展开更多
文摘This study examines the pivotal findings of the network meta-analysis of Zhou et al,which evaluated the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and combination therapies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).This meta-analysis suggests that therapeutic combinations have greater efficacy than do standard treatments.The article highlights the key insights that have the potential to shift current clinical practice and enhance outcomes for patients with advanced HCC.Additionally,this article discusses further research that can be conducted to optimize these treatments and achieve personalized care for patients with HCC.
文摘Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is an advanced targeted therapeuticapproach for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common type ofprimary liver cancer. HAIC has demonstrated significant potential in managingadvanced HCC, particularly in regions with high prevalence rates. Despite itspromise, several challenges and areas for future research remain. Clinical studieshave substantiated the efficacy of HAIC in enhancing survival outcomes forpatients with advanced hepatic carcinoma. Notably, combination therapiesinvolving immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as lenvatinib and programmeddeath-1 inhibitors, have shown substantial improvements in median overallsurvival and progression-free survival compared to systemic chemotherapy.These combination therapies have also exhibited superior response rates anddisease control, with manageable and often less severe adverse events relative tosystemic treatments. This article is based on the review by Zhou et al and aims todiscuss the current status and future directions in the treatment of HCC, emphasizingthe role of HAIC and its integration with novel therapeutic agents.
文摘Hepatic arterial infusion(HAI)chemotherapy,first introduced in the 1980s,has gained recognition as an effective locoregional treatment for colorectal liver metastasis(CRLM).Initially used for unresectable liver metastases,HAI’s app-lication has expanded to the adjuvant setting following hepatic resection,with early studies indicating improved hepatic disease-free survival.Recent research demonstrates that combining HAI with modern systemic therapies enhances conversion to resectability and prolongs both recurrence-free and overall survival,even in heavily pretreated patients with diverse RAS mutational statuses.Person-alization through approaches like microsatellite instability status and dose mo-difications further optimize outcomes.However,the complexity of HAI requires expertise across multidisciplinary teams,limiting its widespread adoption to specialized centers.Ongoing clinical trials continue to investigate HAI’s role in CRLM management,highlighting its potential to become a cornerstone of liver-directed therapy.We explore how HAI chemotherapy,in combination with personalized medicine,can advance treatment strategies for metastatic colorectal cancer.
文摘The rapid evolution of systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),one of the most common types of liver cancer,has attracted significant attention especially to hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)as a highly promising treatment approach.This method,which delivers chemotherapy directly into the liver's arterial supply,is designed to maximize the concentration of anti-cancer drugs at the tumor site while minimizing systemic side effects.Despite the potential and the encouraging results observed in various studies,HAIC has not yet achieved widespread acceptance and utilization.Sorafenib is a widely used systemic therapy that targets multiple pathways involved in tumor growth and angiogenesis,while transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)is a locoregional therapy that combines arterial embolization with chemotherapy.These treatments have been the mainstay of HCC management,yet they have limitations that HAIC may potentially overcome.This article specifically comments on the network meta-analysis that examined the current research status of HAIC,highlighting its effectiveness and safety profile in comparison to established standard treatments such as Sorafenib and TACE.Through an extensive review of existing studies,the authors conclude that patients receiving HAIC often experience better survival rates and longer periods without disease progression compared to those receiving Sorafenib or TACE.
文摘This article provides an in-depth analysis of the study conducted by Wang et al,which explores hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and its synergistic strategies in managing advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).HCC ranks as the fourth most common cause of cancer-related mortality globally and is frequently associated with portal vein tumor thrombus(PVTT).The approach to managing HCC,particularly when PVTT is present,diverges markedly between Eastern and Western practices.These differences are rooted in variations in epidemiology,etiology,pathology,comorbidities,and prognosis.The paper delves into the diagnosis,classification,and treatment strategies for HCC with PVTT,as well as the evolving role and advancements of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in the therapeutic landscape of HCC.
文摘BACKGROUND With the rapid progress of systematic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),therapeutic strategies combining hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)with systematic therapy arised increasing concentrations.However,there have been no systematic review comparing HAIC and its combination strategies in the first-line treatment for advanced HCC.AIM To investigate the efficacy and safety of HAIC and its combination therapies for advanced HCC.METHODS A network meta-analysis was performed by including 9 randomized controlled trails and 35 cohort studies to carry out our study.The outcomes of interest comprised overall survival(OS),progression-free survival(PFS),tumor response and adverse events.Hazard ratios(HR)and odds ratios(OR)with a 95% confidence interval(CI)were calculated and agents were ranked based on their ranking probability.RESULTS HAIC outperformed Sorafenib(HR=0.55,95%CI:0.42-0.72;HR=0.51,95%CI:0.33-0.78;OR=2.86,95%CI:1.37-5.98;OR=5.45,95%CI:3.57-8.30;OR=7.15,95%CI:4.06-12.58;OR=2.89,95%CI:1.99-4.19;OR=0.48,95%CI:0.25-0.92,respectively)and transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)(HR=0.50,95%CI:0.33-0.75;HR=0.62,95%CI:0.39-0.98;OR=3.08,95%CI:1.36-6.98;OR=2.07,95%CI:1.54-2.80;OR=3.16,95%CI:1.71-5.85;OR=2.67,95%CI:1.59-4.50;OR=0.16,95%CI:0.05-0.54,respectively)in terms of efficacy and safety.HAIC+lenvatinib+ablation,HAIC+ablation,HAIC+anti-programmed cell death 1(PD-1),and HAIC+radiotherapy had the higher likelihood of providing better OS and PFS outcomes compared to HAIC alone.HAIC+TACE+S-1,HAIC+lenvatinib,HAIC+PD-1,HAIC+TACE,and HAIC+sorafenib had the higher likelihood of providing better partial response and objective response rate outcomes compared to HAIC.HAIC+PD-1,HAIC+TACE+S-1 and HAIC+TACE had the higher likelihood of providing better complete response and disease control rate outcomes compared to HAIC alone.CONCLUSION HAIC proved more effective and safer than sorafenib and TACE.Furthermore,combined with other interventions,HAIC showed improved efficacy over HAIC monotherapy according to the treatment ranking analysis.
基金Supported by Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province,No.2020A1515011539.
文摘BACKGROUND Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)has been proven to be an ideal choice for treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma(uHCC).HAIC-based treatment showed great potential for treating uHCC.However,large-scale studies on HAIC-based treatments and meta-analyses of first-line treatments for uHCC are lacking.AIM To investigate better first-line treatment options for uHCC and to assess the safety and efficacy of HAIC combined with angiogenesis inhibitors,programmed cell death of protein 1(PD-1)and its ligand(PD-L1)blockers(triple therapy)under real-world conditions.METHODS Several electronic databases were searched to identify eligible randomized controlled trials for this meta-analysis.Study-level pooled analyses of hazard ratios(HRs)and odds ratios(ORs)were performed.This was a retrospective single-center study involving 442 patients with uHCC who received triple therapy or angiogenesis inhibitors plus PD-1/PD-L1 blockades(AIPB)at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from January 2018 to April 2023.Propensity score matching(PSM)was performed to balance the bias between the groups.The Kaplan-Meier method and cox regression were used to analyse the survival data,and the log-rank test was used to compare the suvival time between the groups.RESULTS A total of 13 randomized controlled trials were included.HAIC alone and in combination with sorafenib were found to be effective treatments(P values for ORs:HAIC,0.95;for HRs:HAIC+sorafenib,0.04).After PSM,176 HCC patients were included in the analysis.The triple therapy group(n=88)had a longer median overall survival than the AIPB group(n=88)(31.6 months vs 14.6 months,P<0.001)and a greater incidence of adverse events(94.3%vs 75.4%,P<0.001).CONCLUSION This meta-analysis suggests that HAIC-based treatments are likely to be the best choice for uHCC.Our findings confirm that triple therapy is more effective for uHCC patients than AIPB.
文摘Newer systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)have led to growing interest in combining hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)with systemic treatments.To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of HAIC and combination therapies in treating advanced HCC,a network meta-analysis was conducted by Zhou et al.The study included data from 44 articles.HAIC was superior in overall survival(OS),progression-free survival(PFS),and response rates compared to transarterial chemoembolization and sorafenib.Moreover,combinations of HAIC with other treatments and single agents(e.g.,lenvatinib,ablation,anti-programmed cell death 1 therapy,radiotherapy)provided better OS and PFS outcomes than HAIC alone.In this editorial,we will discuss the study findings,the strengths and weaknesses of the metanalysis,and future advances in the field of HAIC for advanced HCC.
文摘Hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)remains a major challenge in oncology,being a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide.Early-stage HCC is typically treated with surgical resection,transplantation,or ablation,while advanced-stage HCC relies on systemic therapies like sorafenib and newer combinations such as atezolizumab-bevacizumab.Despite these advancements,there is still a need for effective treatments for unresectable HCC,especially in cases with macroscopic vascular invasion.Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)has demonstrated promising outcomes in Asia for the treatment of unresectable HCC,yet its application in Western countries has been relatively limited.This letter reviews the recent meta-analysis by Zhou et al published in the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology,which demonstrates the efficacy and safety of HAIC vs sorafenib.The analysis includes 9 randomized controlled trials and 35 cohort studies,highlighting significant improvements in overall survival,progressionfree survival,and objective response rates with HAIC and its combinations.The editorial explores the reasons behind the limited use of HAIC in Western countries.It underscores the potential of HAIC to enhance treatment outcomes for advanced HCC and calls for more research and broader adoption of HAIC in clinical practice globally.
基金Supported by the Research Fund of Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital,No.12021C11016.
文摘Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)has good clinical efficacy in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC);however,its efficacy varies.This review summarized the ability of various markers to predict the efficacy of HAIC and provided a reference for clinical applications.As of October 25,2023,51 articles have been retrieved based on keyword predictions and HAIC.Sixteen eligible articles were selected for inclusion in this study.Comprehensive literature analysis found that methods used to predict the efficacy of HAIC include serological testing,gene testing,and imaging testing.The above indicators and their combined forms showed excellent predictive effects in retrospective studies.This review summarized the strategies currently used to predict the efficacy of HAIC in middle and advanced HCC,analyzed each marker's ability to predict HAIC efficacy,and provided a reference for the clinical application of the prediction system.
基金Supported by Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission(Z181100010118001)Foundation of Chinese Geriatric Oncology Society(CGOS-01-2012-1-00800)+1 种基金National Key R and D Program of China(2017YFC0114004)National Natural Science Foundation of China(81971717).
文摘BACKGROUND There is little evidence of combining sorafenib with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)after transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)for intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).It is important to identify that patients with intermediate and advanced HCC are most likely to benefit from this combination therapy.AIM To investigate the safety and clinical outcomes of sorafenib combined with HAIC with folinic acid,5-fluorouracil(5-FU),and oxaliplatin(FOLFOX)after TACE for intermediate and advanced HCC.METHODS This prospective phase II study enrolled patients with intermediate and advanced HCC who underwent treatment with sorafenib combined with TACEHAIC.All patients initially received the standard 400 mg dose of sorafenib twice daily before TACE-HAIC.Participants at our institute with intermediate and advanced HCC underwent routine TACE.Then,the catheter used for embolization was kept in place in the hepatic artery,and oxaliplatin was intraarterially administered for 6 h,followed by 5-FU for 18 h,and folinic acid was intravenously administered for 2 h.The primary endpoints were safety,as evaluated by the Common Terminology and Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0,and 12-mo progression-free survival(PFS),as analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method.As secondary endpoints,the objective response rate(ORR)was evaluated by the modified Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors,and survival time[overall survival(OS)]was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method.RESULTS Sixty-six participants at our institute with intermediate and advanced HCC were enrolled in this prospective study(mean age,53.3±11.7 years).Approximately 56.1%of participants had Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer(BCLC)stage C disease,and 43.9%had BCLC stage B disease.The ORR was 42.4%.The disease control rate was 87.9%.The grade 3-4 toxicities consisted of thrombocytopenia(4.5%),neutropenia(3.0%),and elevated aspartate aminotransferase(12.2%).Hand-foot skin reaction was also observed(40.9%).The median PFS was 13.1 mo(13.5 mo in the BCLC stage B participants and 9.4 mo in the BCLC stage C participants).The 6-mo,12-mo,and 24-mo PFS rates were 75.0%,54.7%,and 30.0%,respectively.The median OS was 21.8 mo.CONCLUSION Sorafenib combined with HAIC(FOLFOX)after TACE may be a feasible treatment choice for intermediate and advanced HCC because this treatment met the prespecified endpoint of a 6-mo PFS rate exceeding 50%and had good patient tolerance.Prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the effect of this combination therapy.
基金Supported by A Grant-in-Aid for research on the Third Term Comprehensive Control Research for Cancer from the Ministry on Health,Labour and Welfare,Japan,to Atsushi Nakajimaa grant from the National Institute of Biomedical Innovation (NBIO) to Atsushi Nakajima+1 种基金a grant from the Ministry of Education,Culture,Sports,Science and Technology,Japan(KIBAN-B), to Atsushi Nakajima,(KIBAN-C),to Satoru Saitothe grant program,"Collaborative Development of Innovative Seeds," from the Japan Science and Technology Agency(JST)
文摘AIM:To evaluate the effectiveness of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) resistant to transarterial chemoembolization(TACE).METHODS:This study was conducted on 42 patients who received HAIC for advanced HCC between 2001and 2010 at our hospital.5-fluorouracil(5-FU) was administered continuously for 24 h from day 1 to day 5 every 2-4 wk via an injection reservoir.Intra-arterial cisplatin or subcutaneous interferon was administered in combination with the 5-FU.The patients enrolled in this retrospective study were divided into two groups according to whether or not they fulfilled the criteria for resistance to TACE proposed by the Japan Society of Hepatology in 2010(written in Japanese);one group of patients who did not fulfill the criteria for TACE resistance(group A,n = 23),and another group who fulfilled the criteria for TACE resistance(group B,n = 19).We compared the outcomes in terms of the response and survival rates between the two groups.RESULTS:Both the response rate and tumor suppression rate following HAIC were significantly superior in group A than in group B(response rate:48% vs 16%,P = 0.028,tumor suppression rate:87% vs 53%,P = 0.014).Furthermore,both the progression-free survival rate and survival time were significantly superior in group A than in group B(3-,6-,12-,and 24-mo = 83%,70%,29% and 20% vs 63%,42%,16% and 0%,respectively,P = 0.040,and 9.8 mo vs 6.2 mo,P = 0.040).A multivariate analysis(Cox proportional hazards regression model) showed that resistance to TACE was an independent predictor of poor survival(P = 0.007).CONCLUSION:HAIC administrating 5-FU was not effective against advanced HCC resistant to TACE.Other tools for treatment,i.e.,molecular-targeting agents may be considered for these cases.
文摘AIM:To investigate the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC) using floxuridine(FUDR) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) confined to the liver.METHODS:Thirty-four patients who had advanced HCC with unresectability or unsuccessful previous therapy in the absence of extrahepatic metastasis were treated with intra-arterial FUDR chemotherapy at ourhospital between March 2005 and May 2008.Among the 34 patients,9 patients were classified as Child class C,and 18 patients had portal vein tumor thrombus(PVTT).One course of chemotherapy consisted of continuous infusion of FUDR(0.3 mg/kg during day 1-14) and dexamethasone(10 mg on day 1,4,7 and 11),and this treatment was repeated every 28 d.RESULTS:Two patients(5.9%) displayed a complete response,and 12 patients(35.3%) had a partial response.The tumor control rate was 61.8%.The median overall survival times were 15.3 mo,12.4 mo and 4.3 mo for the patients who were classified as Child class A,Child class B and Child class C,respectively(P = 0.0392).The progression-free survival was 12.9 mo,7.7 mo and 2.6 mo for the patients who were classified as Child class A,Child class B and Child class C,respectively(P = 0.0443).The cumulative survival differed significantly according to the Child-Pugh classification and the presence of PVTT.In addition to hepatic reserve capacity and PVTT,the extent of HCC was an independent factor in determining a poor prognosis.The most common adverse reactions to HAIC were mucositis,diarrhea and peptic ulcer disease,but most of these complications were improved by medical treatment and/or a delay of HAIC.CONCLUSION:The present study demonstrates that intra-arterial FUDR chemotherapy is a safe and effective treatment for advanced HCC that is recalcitrant to other therapeutic modalities,even in patients with advanced cirrhosis.
文摘BACKGROUND Transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)have shown promising local benefits for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).S-1,a composite preparation of a 5-fluorouracil prodrug,has proven to be a convenient oral chemotherapeutic agent with definite efficacy against advanced HCC.AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE followed by HAIC with or without oral S-1 for treating advanced HCC.METHODS In this single-center,open-label,prospective,randomized controlled trial,117 participants with advanced HCC were randomized to receive TACE followed by oxaliplatin-based HAIC either with(TACE/HAIC+S-1,n=56)or without(TACE/HAIC,n=61)oral S-1 between December 2013 and September 2017.Two participants were excluded from final analysis for withdrawing consent.The primary endpoint was progression-free survival(PFS)and secondary endpoints included overall survival(OS),objective response rate,disease control rate and safety.RESULTS In total,115 participants(100 males and 15 females;mean age,57.7 years±11.9)were analyzed.The median PFS and OS were 5.0 mo(0.4–58.6 mo)(95%confidence interval(CI):3.82 to 6.18)vs 4.4 mo(1.1–54.4 mo)(95%CI:2.54 to 6.26;P=0.585)and 8.4 mo(0.4–58.6 mo)(95%CI:6.88 to 9.92)vs 8.3 mo(1.4–54.4 m)(95%CI:5.71 to 10.96;P=0.985)in the TACE/HAIC+S-1 and TACE/HAIC groups,respectively.The objective response rate and disease control rate were 30.9%vs 18.4%and 72.7%vs 56.7%in the TACE/HAIC+S-1 and TACE/HAIC groups,respectively.Grade 3/4 adverse events had a similar frequency in both treatment groups.CONCLUSION No improvements in tumor response rates,PFS or OS were observed with the addition of S-1 to TACE/HAIC in advanced HCC.Both treatment regimens had a similar safety profile.
基金supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81471759)Beijing Hospitals Authority Clinical Medicine Development of Special Funding Support (code: ZYLX202117)。
文摘Objective:This study aimed to introduce and evaluate a new embolization technique for the right gastric artery(RGA) during percutaneous implantation of a port-catheter system for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC).Methods:From January 2013 to January 2017,159 patients with unresectable advanced liver cancer underwent percutaneous implantation of a port-catheter system.In 86 of these patients(56 men;aged 28-88 years;mean:60.6±12.0 years),in whom the RGA was obvious on arteriography,embolization of RGA was attempted using microcoils to protect the gastric mucosa during HAIC.In the first phase(first three years),antegrade embolization of the RGA using a 2.7 Fr microcatheter was performed in 55 patients.In the second phase(next two years),embolization of the RGA was attempted by combining antegrade embolization and retrograde embolization through the left gastric artery(LGA) in 31 patients.The success rates and the incidence of acute gastroduodenal mucosal toxicity(AGMT) in these two groups were compared.Results:The total success rate of the RGA embolization was 70.9%.The success rate was 83.9% in 31 patients who underwent combined antegrade and retrograde embolization,which was significantly higher than that of antegrade embolization alone(63.6%) performed in 55 patients(p=0.047).No complications related to embolization of RGA were documented.The incidence of AGMT was 29.1%(16/55) in patients in the first phase,which was significantly higher than that in the patients in the second phase(9.7%,3/31)(p=0.037).Conclusion: A combination of retrograde embolization via LGA could increase the success rates of RGA embolization and reduce the incidence of AGMT after HAIC.
文摘Objective:To study the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion of Endostatin(YH-16,Endostar),combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE) on advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.Methods:Thirty patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma were enrolled in the study.The patients received hepatic arterial infusion of Endostar combined with TACE.The efficacy was evaluated strictly after 1-2 cycles according to RECIST criteria and the value of AFP;quality of life(QOL) was evaluated according to Karnofsky scores.Adverse effects were evaluated too.Results:29 cases' efficacy was evaluated among the total 30 cases.The KPS were significantly increased after the treatment(80.39 ± 8.37 vs 73.93 ± 9.22,P = 0.002).Compared with control group,the objective response rate(CR and PR) and the rate of AFP negative changed were significantly higher(P = 0.021,P = 0.046).The adverse effects were not obvious.Conclusion:The QOL and preliminary efficiency of patients of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma may be improved by hepatic arterial infusion of Endostar combined with TACE,the rate of AFP negative changed were significantly higher too,and there are little of adverse effects.It is worthy to clinical generalization and further clinical observation.
文摘BACKGROUND Recently,hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)plus lenvatinib has been frequently used to treat unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma(uHCC)in China.In the clinic,the hepatic arteries of some patients shrink significantly during this treatment,leading to improved short-term efficacy.AIM To investigate the relationship between the shrinkage of hepatic arteries and the short-term effect of HAIC plus lenvatinib treatment.METHODS Sixty-seven participants with uHCC were enrolled in this retrospective study.The patients received HAIC every 3 wk,followed by oral lenvatinib after the first HAIC course.Hepatic artery diameters were measured on CT before treatment and after 1 and 2 mo of treatment.Meanwhile,the changes in tumor capillaries were also examined on pathological specimens before and after 1 mo of treatment.The antitumor response after 1,3,and 6 mo of treatment was assessed using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors(mRECIST).The relationship between the changes in vessel diameters and the short-term effect of the combination treatment was evaluated by receiver-operating characteristic and logistic regression analyses.RESULTS The hepatic artery diameters were all significantly decreased after 1 and 2 mo of treatment(P<0.001),but there was no difference in the vessel diameters between 1 and 2 mo(P>0.05).The microvessel density in the tumor lesions decreased significantly after 1 mo of combination treatment(P<0.001).According to mRECIST,46,41,and 24 patients had complete or partial responses after 1,3,and 6 mo of treatment,respectively,whereas 21,21,and 32 patients had a stable or progressive disease at these times,respectively.Shrinkage of the tumor-feeding artery was significantly associated with the tumor response after 1,3,and 6 mo of treatment(P<0.001,P=0.004,and P=0.023,respectively);however,changes in other hepatic arteries were not significantly associated with the tumor response.Furthermore,shrinkage of the tumor-feeding artery was an independent factor for treatment efficacy(P=0.001,P=0.001,and P=0.002 and 1,3,and 6 mo,respectively).CONCLUSION The hepatic arteries shrank rapidly after treatment with HAIC plus lenvatinib,and shrinkage of the tumor-feeding artery diameter was closely related to improved short-term efficacy.
基金supported by Capital Medical Development and Scientific Research Fund, China (No. 2014-2-2154)National Science Foundation of China (No. 81571781)
文摘Objective： To investigate the prognostic factors in chemorefractory colorectal cancer liver metastasis（CRCLM）patients treated by transarterial chemoembolization（TACE） and sustained hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy（HAIC）.Methods： Between 2006 and 2015, 162 patients who underwent 763 TACE and HAIC in total were enrolled in this retrospective study, including 110 males and 52 females, with a median age of 60（range, 26–83） years.Prognostic factors were assessed with Log-rank test, Cox univariate and multivariate analyses.Results： The median survival time（MST） and median progression-free survival（PFS） of the 162 patients from first TACE/HAIC were 15.6 months and 5.5 months respectively. Normal serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9（CA19-9, 〈37 U/m L）（P〈0.001） and carbohydrate antigen 72-4（CA72-4, 〈6.7 U/m L）（P=0.026）, combination with other local treatment（liver radiotherapy or liver radiofrequency ablation）（P=0.034） and response to TACE/HAIC（P〈0.001） were significant factors related to survival after TACE/HAIC in univariate analysis. A multivariate analysis revealed that normal serum CA19-9（P〈0.001）, response to TACE/HAIC（P〈0.001） and combination with other local treatment（P=0.001） were independent factors among them.Conclusions： Our findings indicate that serum CA19-9 〈37 U/m L and response to TACE/HAIC are significant prognostic indicators for this combined treatment, and treated with other local treatment could reach a considerable survival benefit for CRCLM. This could be useful for making decisions regarding the treatment of CRCLM.
文摘In this manuscript,we comment on the article by Zhou et al,who assessed the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)and its combination strategies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)using network metaanalysis methodology.We focus specifically on the potential advantages and role of HAIC in the treatment algorithm for advanced HCC.However,there remains numerous knowledge gaps before the role of HAIC can be established.There is significant heterogeneity of HAIC regimes with difficult interpretation of the clinical outcomes.Additionally,there is a lack of direct comparative data between HAIC,systemic chemotherapy,novel immunotherapies and targeted therapies.The underlying biochemical mechanisms that might explain the efficacy of HAIC and its effect on the HCC microenvironment requires further research.In the developing era of nanotechnology and targeted drug delivery systems,there is potential for integration of HAIC with novel technologies to effectively treat advanced HCC whilst minimising systemic complications.
基金Supported by Beijing Medical Award Foundation of China,No.YXJL-2023-0638-0048.
文摘BACKGROUND Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)is a widely used local therapeutic approach for intermediate to advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),exhibiting considerable efficacy.However,the prevalence of postoperative pain highlights the importance of pain management.Owing to the limitations inherent in existing pain management strategies,this study investigates and assesses the analgesic effectiveness of a multimodal treatment protocol in mitigating pain after HAIC procedures.AIM To provide patients with a more comprehensive and effective pain management strategy.METHODS A total of 100 patients with primary HCC who underwent HAIC were randomly assigned to a control group(n=50)and a multimodal group(n=50).Baseline characteristics and perioperative data were collected.Upon enrollment,patients in the multimodal group received parecoxib(40 mg)30 minutes before HAIC,followed by 48 hours of patient-controlled analgesia with sufentanil.In contrast,the control group underwent standard preoperative preparation(psychological support)and received dezocine(5 mg)intraoperatively,with intravenous flurbiprofen(100 mg)administered every 12 hours for 48 hours postoperatively.RESULTS Compared to the control group,the multimodal analgesia group exhibited significantly lower resting and movement visual analog scale pain scores at postoperative 0,2,4,6,and 12 hours(P<0.05).Furthermore,the multimodal group experienced a reduced incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting,as well as a lower overall frequency of adverse events,compared to the control group(P<0.05).Patient satisfaction was also significantly higher in the multimodal group than in the control group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Our study demonstrates that multimodal analgesia is effective in reducing postoperative pain,minimizing adverse reactions,and improving patient satisfaction in HCC patients undergoing HAIC.This approach provides valuable clinical strategies for optimizing pain management in this patient population.
