<span style="font-family:Verdana;">Coordination compounds of 3-hydroxy-2-methyl-4</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">H</span></i><span style="fo...<span style="font-family:Verdana;">Coordination compounds of 3-hydroxy-2-methyl-4</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">H</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-pyran-4-one with </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">iron(III), cobat(III) and chromium(III) were synthesized with M:L (1:2)</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. Mixed ligand coordination compounds of 3-hydroxy-2-methyl-4</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">H</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-pyran-4-one and 1,2-diaminocyclohexane using the same metal ions were also synthesized </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">M:L1</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">:</span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">L2</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (1:1:1) where </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">L1</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> is 3-hydroxy-2-methyl-4</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">H</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-pyran-4-one and </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">L2</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> is 1,2-diaminocyclohexane. The coordination compounds obtained were characterized using electronic and infrared spectral analyses, magnetic susceptibility and percentage metal analysis. They were also evaluated for their cytotoxic and antioxidant activities. The result obtained suggested that octahedral geometry was obtained for all the compounds, as a result of additional two molecules of the solvent coordinated to the metal ions. Both the primary and secondary ligands coordinated in a bidentate fashion. The synthesized compounds exhibited moderate cytotoxicity, although none was as active as the standard. The cobalt(III) mixed ligand complex elicited the highest activity. The synthesized compounds all exhibited good to moderate antioxidant activity.</span>展开更多
芝麻是八大类食物过敏原之一,快速准确识别芝麻过敏原对预防其过敏有重要意义。核酸适配体可以高效识别靶标过敏原,在过敏原检测中有良好的应用前景。为了获得芝麻主要过敏原Ses i 2的特异性核酸适体,本研究以Ses i 2为靶标,通过磁珠筛...芝麻是八大类食物过敏原之一,快速准确识别芝麻过敏原对预防其过敏有重要意义。核酸适配体可以高效识别靶标过敏原,在过敏原检测中有良好的应用前景。为了获得芝麻主要过敏原Ses i 2的特异性核酸适体,本研究以Ses i 2为靶标,通过磁珠筛选法(磁珠-SELEX)开展10轮筛选,经由高通量测序获得6条候补序列(S1~S6),并进行家族性、同源性分析及二级结构预测。结果表明,6条候选核酸适体的重复率可达46.38%,其自由能在-9.02到-2.47 kcal·moL^(-1)之间,根据自由能能量稳定原则,S1和S5吉布斯自由能最低最稳定,分别为-6.70和-9.02 kcal·moL^(-1)。利用ELISA试验进行亲和力测试,结果表明核酸适体S1和S2的亲和能力较强,S1:KD=67.02 nmol·L^(-1),R2=0.925 8,S2:KD=97.65 nmol·L^(-1),R2=0.795 1。核酸适体S1与过敏原Ses i 2的结合力和其他过敏原蛋白相比有显著差异,可视为具有特异性。本研究最终获得一条兼具良好亲和力和特异性的核酸适体S1,为芝麻过敏原快速检测提供了技术支撑。展开更多
目的了解中老年2型糖尿病(type 2 diabetes mellitus,T2DM)患者少肌性肥胖(sarcopenic obesity,SO)患病率及不同诊断方法之间的一致性。方法采用系统随机抽样法选取2016年1月至2018年3月于北京地区9家医院内分泌科就诊的≥50岁T2DM患者...目的了解中老年2型糖尿病(type 2 diabetes mellitus,T2DM)患者少肌性肥胖(sarcopenic obesity,SO)患病率及不同诊断方法之间的一致性。方法采用系统随机抽样法选取2016年1月至2018年3月于北京地区9家医院内分泌科就诊的≥50岁T2DM患者,使用生物阻抗法进行身体成分检测;根据2022年欧洲临床营养与代谢学会(European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism,ESPEN)和欧洲肥胖研究协会(European Association for the Study of Obesity,EASO)方法定义SO,另外3种方法通过肌少症和肥胖的组合进行诊断。肌少症使用2019年亚洲肌少症工作组(Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia,AWGS)建立的标准来定义,肥胖通过体脂(percent of body fat,PBF)、腰围(waist circumference,WC)和体质量指数(body mass index,BMI)来定义。卡方检验进行率的比较,Cohens kappa统计分析比较4种方法的诊断一致性。结果共纳入1125例T2DM受试者,男性586例,年龄[61.2(55.3,67.4)]岁;女性539例,年龄[62.0(56.3,68.1)岁]。使用ESPEN/EASO共识、AWGS+PBF、AWGS+WC和AWGS+BMI标准,中老年T2DM患者SO患病率分别为41.6%、20.4%、30.1%和18.8%。4种方法之间的诊断一致性存在异质性(κ:0.109~0.655)。ESPEN/EASO共识与AWGS+PBF诊断一致性良好(κ:0.655),AWGS+体脂与AWGS+BMI诊断一致性良好(κ:0.637),AWGS+WC与AWGS+BMI(κ:0.359)、与AWGS+PBF诊断一致性中等(κ:0.330)。结论中老年T2DM患者SO患病率高,患病率和诊断一致性在不同诊断方法中存在差异,ESPEN/EASO的共识诊断率最高,AWGS+BMI诊断率最低,ESPEN/EASO共识与AWGS+体脂具有良好的诊断一致性。展开更多
文摘<span style="font-family:Verdana;">Coordination compounds of 3-hydroxy-2-methyl-4</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">H</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-pyran-4-one with </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">iron(III), cobat(III) and chromium(III) were synthesized with M:L (1:2)</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. Mixed ligand coordination compounds of 3-hydroxy-2-methyl-4</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">H</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-pyran-4-one and 1,2-diaminocyclohexane using the same metal ions were also synthesized </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">M:L1</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">:</span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">L2</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (1:1:1) where </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">L1</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> is 3-hydroxy-2-methyl-4</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">H</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-pyran-4-one and </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">L2</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> is 1,2-diaminocyclohexane. The coordination compounds obtained were characterized using electronic and infrared spectral analyses, magnetic susceptibility and percentage metal analysis. They were also evaluated for their cytotoxic and antioxidant activities. The result obtained suggested that octahedral geometry was obtained for all the compounds, as a result of additional two molecules of the solvent coordinated to the metal ions. Both the primary and secondary ligands coordinated in a bidentate fashion. The synthesized compounds exhibited moderate cytotoxicity, although none was as active as the standard. The cobalt(III) mixed ligand complex elicited the highest activity. The synthesized compounds all exhibited good to moderate antioxidant activity.</span>
文摘芝麻是八大类食物过敏原之一,快速准确识别芝麻过敏原对预防其过敏有重要意义。核酸适配体可以高效识别靶标过敏原,在过敏原检测中有良好的应用前景。为了获得芝麻主要过敏原Ses i 2的特异性核酸适体,本研究以Ses i 2为靶标,通过磁珠筛选法(磁珠-SELEX)开展10轮筛选,经由高通量测序获得6条候补序列(S1~S6),并进行家族性、同源性分析及二级结构预测。结果表明,6条候选核酸适体的重复率可达46.38%,其自由能在-9.02到-2.47 kcal·moL^(-1)之间,根据自由能能量稳定原则,S1和S5吉布斯自由能最低最稳定,分别为-6.70和-9.02 kcal·moL^(-1)。利用ELISA试验进行亲和力测试,结果表明核酸适体S1和S2的亲和能力较强,S1:KD=67.02 nmol·L^(-1),R2=0.925 8,S2:KD=97.65 nmol·L^(-1),R2=0.795 1。核酸适体S1与过敏原Ses i 2的结合力和其他过敏原蛋白相比有显著差异,可视为具有特异性。本研究最终获得一条兼具良好亲和力和特异性的核酸适体S1,为芝麻过敏原快速检测提供了技术支撑。
文摘目的了解中老年2型糖尿病(type 2 diabetes mellitus,T2DM)患者少肌性肥胖(sarcopenic obesity,SO)患病率及不同诊断方法之间的一致性。方法采用系统随机抽样法选取2016年1月至2018年3月于北京地区9家医院内分泌科就诊的≥50岁T2DM患者,使用生物阻抗法进行身体成分检测;根据2022年欧洲临床营养与代谢学会(European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism,ESPEN)和欧洲肥胖研究协会(European Association for the Study of Obesity,EASO)方法定义SO,另外3种方法通过肌少症和肥胖的组合进行诊断。肌少症使用2019年亚洲肌少症工作组(Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia,AWGS)建立的标准来定义,肥胖通过体脂(percent of body fat,PBF)、腰围(waist circumference,WC)和体质量指数(body mass index,BMI)来定义。卡方检验进行率的比较,Cohens kappa统计分析比较4种方法的诊断一致性。结果共纳入1125例T2DM受试者,男性586例,年龄[61.2(55.3,67.4)]岁;女性539例,年龄[62.0(56.3,68.1)岁]。使用ESPEN/EASO共识、AWGS+PBF、AWGS+WC和AWGS+BMI标准,中老年T2DM患者SO患病率分别为41.6%、20.4%、30.1%和18.8%。4种方法之间的诊断一致性存在异质性(κ:0.109~0.655)。ESPEN/EASO共识与AWGS+PBF诊断一致性良好(κ:0.655),AWGS+体脂与AWGS+BMI诊断一致性良好(κ:0.637),AWGS+WC与AWGS+BMI(κ:0.359)、与AWGS+PBF诊断一致性中等(κ:0.330)。结论中老年T2DM患者SO患病率高,患病率和诊断一致性在不同诊断方法中存在差异,ESPEN/EASO的共识诊断率最高,AWGS+BMI诊断率最低,ESPEN/EASO共识与AWGS+体脂具有良好的诊断一致性。