AIM: To compare the clinical performance of two types of silicon hydrogel contact lenses used as bandage lenses after LASEK surgery. METHODS: A prospective, double-masked study was conducted on 42 eyes of 21 patients ...AIM: To compare the clinical performance of two types of silicon hydrogel contact lenses used as bandage lenses after LASEK surgery. METHODS: A prospective, double-masked study was conducted on 42 eyes of 21 patients who received binocular LASEK surgeries. The interocular difference in spherical equivalent power was less than -1.50D. Patients were randomly assigned to wear Galyfilcon A (Lens A) bandage contact lens in one eye and Balafilcon A (Lens B) in the fellow eye after the surgery. The responses to a subjective questionnaire on comfort of wearing, corneal epithelial status, conjunctival hyperemia, limbal neovascularization, lens fitting and contact lens debris were assessed 1 and 5 days postoperatively. Corneal endothelium was assessed before and 5 days after the surgery upon bandage lens removal. RESULTS: There was no difference between the two groups in terms of conjunctival hyperemia, limbal neovascularization, contact lens fitting, corneal epithelial status, corneal endothelium cell density (CD) and endothelium cell size (CS) at any postoperative visit. Complaints of discomfort, including foreign body sensation, pain and intolerance were statistically more among Lens B wearers at any postoperative visit (P < 0.05). Lens B appeared to attract much more debris than Lens A at the 5-day post-operative follow-up visit (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The two types of silicon hydrogel lenses investigated in this study demonstrated similar clinical performance in terms of corneal responses and lens fitting. However, Lens A showed a better performance in terms of comfort of wearing and deposit resistance.展开更多
AIM:To evaluate the driving performance in young and middle-aged Chinese glaucoma patients with mild to severe visual field loss compared to those without glaucoma by using a driving simulation test.METHODS:Twenty-nin...AIM:To evaluate the driving performance in young and middle-aged Chinese glaucoma patients with mild to severe visual field loss compared to those without glaucoma by using a driving simulation test.METHODS:Twenty-nine participants were included in this study:nine patients with glaucoma but pass the binocular Esterman visual field test,ten patients with glaucoma and fail the binocular Esterman visual field test,and ten age-matched healthy controls.A driving simulation test was designed as a frequency-based analysis of a lanekeeping task.The total performance error,the controlresponse amplitude and delay were calculated.RESULTS:Esterman visual field test fail group showed the longest delay of control-response among three groups(P=0.02).And the delay in lane-keeping task was significantly associated with inferior field of better-eye(r=0.51,P=0.004)and integrated visual field(r=0.55,P=0.002).CONCLUSION:Young and middle-aged glaucoma patients with binocular visual field loss suffered from a longer delay of response in driving simulation test,while inferior visual field having more impact than superior visual field.展开更多
文摘AIM: To compare the clinical performance of two types of silicon hydrogel contact lenses used as bandage lenses after LASEK surgery. METHODS: A prospective, double-masked study was conducted on 42 eyes of 21 patients who received binocular LASEK surgeries. The interocular difference in spherical equivalent power was less than -1.50D. Patients were randomly assigned to wear Galyfilcon A (Lens A) bandage contact lens in one eye and Balafilcon A (Lens B) in the fellow eye after the surgery. The responses to a subjective questionnaire on comfort of wearing, corneal epithelial status, conjunctival hyperemia, limbal neovascularization, lens fitting and contact lens debris were assessed 1 and 5 days postoperatively. Corneal endothelium was assessed before and 5 days after the surgery upon bandage lens removal. RESULTS: There was no difference between the two groups in terms of conjunctival hyperemia, limbal neovascularization, contact lens fitting, corneal epithelial status, corneal endothelium cell density (CD) and endothelium cell size (CS) at any postoperative visit. Complaints of discomfort, including foreign body sensation, pain and intolerance were statistically more among Lens B wearers at any postoperative visit (P < 0.05). Lens B appeared to attract much more debris than Lens A at the 5-day post-operative follow-up visit (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The two types of silicon hydrogel lenses investigated in this study demonstrated similar clinical performance in terms of corneal responses and lens fitting. However, Lens A showed a better performance in terms of comfort of wearing and deposit resistance.
基金Supported by State Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.81430007)National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.81790641,No.81401533)Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai(No.18ZR1406000)。
文摘AIM:To evaluate the driving performance in young and middle-aged Chinese glaucoma patients with mild to severe visual field loss compared to those without glaucoma by using a driving simulation test.METHODS:Twenty-nine participants were included in this study:nine patients with glaucoma but pass the binocular Esterman visual field test,ten patients with glaucoma and fail the binocular Esterman visual field test,and ten age-matched healthy controls.A driving simulation test was designed as a frequency-based analysis of a lanekeeping task.The total performance error,the controlresponse amplitude and delay were calculated.RESULTS:Esterman visual field test fail group showed the longest delay of control-response among three groups(P=0.02).And the delay in lane-keeping task was significantly associated with inferior field of better-eye(r=0.51,P=0.004)and integrated visual field(r=0.55,P=0.002).CONCLUSION:Young and middle-aged glaucoma patients with binocular visual field loss suffered from a longer delay of response in driving simulation test,while inferior visual field having more impact than superior visual field.
