BACKGROUND There are few clinicopathologic characteristics and clinical results for oesophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumours(GISTs).Thus,the objective of this study was to identify the clinicopathologic characteri...BACKGROUND There are few clinicopathologic characteristics and clinical results for oesophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumours(GISTs).Thus,the objective of this study was to identify the clinicopathologic characteristics and clinical results of oesophageal GISTs.AIM To investigate endoscopic treatment effective of oesophageal GISTs.METHODS It was retrospective research that collected 32 patients with oesophageal GISTs treated by endoscopic resection(ER)between January 2012 and January 2023 in two Hospital.Clinicopathologic,endoscopic records,and follow-up data were collected and analysed.RESULTS Thirty-one patients underwent en bloc resection and 24(75.0%)lesions underwent R0 resection.The size of GISTs was 2.12±1.88 cm.The overall complication rate was 25.0%,including hydrothorax and post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome.The mean mitotic index was 3.34±5.04(median,1.50;range,1.00-4.00).Eighteen(56.3%),6(18.8%),2(6.3%),and 6(18.8%)patients were identified as very low,low,intermediate,and high risk,respectively.Three patients developed recurrence after a median follow-up of 64.69±33.13 months.The 5-year overall survival rate was 100%,and the disease-free survival rate was 90.6%.CONCLUSION ER is safe and effective for patients with low-risk oesophageal GISTs.Early detection of oesophageal GISTs is essential to achieve a favourable prognosis.展开更多
BACKGROUND Improved adenoma detection at colonoscopy has decreased the risk of developing colorectal cancer.However,whether image-enhanced endoscopy(IEE)further improves the adenoma detection rate(ADR)is controversial...BACKGROUND Improved adenoma detection at colonoscopy has decreased the risk of developing colorectal cancer.However,whether image-enhanced endoscopy(IEE)further improves the adenoma detection rate(ADR)is controversial.AIM To compare IEE with white-light imaging(WLI)endoscopy for the detection and identification of colorectal adenoma.METHODS This was a multicenter,randomized,controlled trial.Participants were enrolled between September 2019 to April 2021 from 4 hospital in China.Patients were randomly assigned to an IEE group with WLI on entry and IEE on withdrawal(n=2113)or a WLI group with WLI on both entry and withdrawal(n=2098).The primary outcome was the ADR.The secondary endpoints were the polyp detection rate(PDR),adenomas per colonoscopy,adenomas per positive colonoscopy,and factors related to adenoma detection.RESULTS A total of 4211 patients(966 adenomas)were included in the analysis(mean age,56.7 years,47.1%male).There were 2113 patients(508 adenomas)in the IEE group and 2098 patients(458 adenomas)in the WLI group.The ADR in two group were not significantly different[24.0%vs 21.8%,1.10,95%confidence interval(CI):0.99-1.23,P=0.09].The PDR was higher with IEE group(41.7%)than with WLI group(36.1%,1.16,95%CI:1.07-1.25,P=0.01).Differences in mean withdrawal time(7.90±3.42 min vs 7.85±3.47 min,P=0.30)and adenomas per colonoscopy(0.33±0.68 vs 0.28±0.62,P=0.06)were not significant.Subgroup analysis found that with narrowband imaging(NBI),between-group differences in the ADR,were not significant(23.7%vs 21.8%,1.09,95%CI:0.97-1.22,P=0.15),but were greater with linked color imaging(30.9%vs 21.8%,1.42,95%CI:1.04-1.93,P=0.04).the second-generation NBI(2G-NBI)had an advantage of ADR than both WLI and the first-generation NBI(27.0%vs 21.8%,P=0.01;27.0%vs 21.2.0%,P=0.01).CONCLUSION This prospective study confirmed that,among Chinese,IEE didn’t increase the ADR compared with WLI,but 2G-NBI increase the ADR.展开更多
基金Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.82002515,No.82273025 and No.82203460China Postdoctoral Science Foundation,No.2022TQ0070 and No.2022M710759Shanghai Municipal Commission of Science and Technology,No.22JC1403003,No.22XD1402200,No.19140901902 and No.22S31903800.
文摘BACKGROUND There are few clinicopathologic characteristics and clinical results for oesophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumours(GISTs).Thus,the objective of this study was to identify the clinicopathologic characteristics and clinical results of oesophageal GISTs.AIM To investigate endoscopic treatment effective of oesophageal GISTs.METHODS It was retrospective research that collected 32 patients with oesophageal GISTs treated by endoscopic resection(ER)between January 2012 and January 2023 in two Hospital.Clinicopathologic,endoscopic records,and follow-up data were collected and analysed.RESULTS Thirty-one patients underwent en bloc resection and 24(75.0%)lesions underwent R0 resection.The size of GISTs was 2.12±1.88 cm.The overall complication rate was 25.0%,including hydrothorax and post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome.The mean mitotic index was 3.34±5.04(median,1.50;range,1.00-4.00).Eighteen(56.3%),6(18.8%),2(6.3%),and 6(18.8%)patients were identified as very low,low,intermediate,and high risk,respectively.Three patients developed recurrence after a median follow-up of 64.69±33.13 months.The 5-year overall survival rate was 100%,and the disease-free survival rate was 90.6%.CONCLUSION ER is safe and effective for patients with low-risk oesophageal GISTs.Early detection of oesophageal GISTs is essential to achieve a favourable prognosis.
基金Supported by the National Key R&D Program of China,No. 2018YFC1315005National Natural Science Foundation of China,No. 82002515+1 种基金Shanghai Sailing Program,No. 20YF1407200China Postdoctoral Science Foundation,No. 2020M681177
文摘BACKGROUND Improved adenoma detection at colonoscopy has decreased the risk of developing colorectal cancer.However,whether image-enhanced endoscopy(IEE)further improves the adenoma detection rate(ADR)is controversial.AIM To compare IEE with white-light imaging(WLI)endoscopy for the detection and identification of colorectal adenoma.METHODS This was a multicenter,randomized,controlled trial.Participants were enrolled between September 2019 to April 2021 from 4 hospital in China.Patients were randomly assigned to an IEE group with WLI on entry and IEE on withdrawal(n=2113)or a WLI group with WLI on both entry and withdrawal(n=2098).The primary outcome was the ADR.The secondary endpoints were the polyp detection rate(PDR),adenomas per colonoscopy,adenomas per positive colonoscopy,and factors related to adenoma detection.RESULTS A total of 4211 patients(966 adenomas)were included in the analysis(mean age,56.7 years,47.1%male).There were 2113 patients(508 adenomas)in the IEE group and 2098 patients(458 adenomas)in the WLI group.The ADR in two group were not significantly different[24.0%vs 21.8%,1.10,95%confidence interval(CI):0.99-1.23,P=0.09].The PDR was higher with IEE group(41.7%)than with WLI group(36.1%,1.16,95%CI:1.07-1.25,P=0.01).Differences in mean withdrawal time(7.90±3.42 min vs 7.85±3.47 min,P=0.30)and adenomas per colonoscopy(0.33±0.68 vs 0.28±0.62,P=0.06)were not significant.Subgroup analysis found that with narrowband imaging(NBI),between-group differences in the ADR,were not significant(23.7%vs 21.8%,1.09,95%CI:0.97-1.22,P=0.15),but were greater with linked color imaging(30.9%vs 21.8%,1.42,95%CI:1.04-1.93,P=0.04).the second-generation NBI(2G-NBI)had an advantage of ADR than both WLI and the first-generation NBI(27.0%vs 21.8%,P=0.01;27.0%vs 21.2.0%,P=0.01).CONCLUSION This prospective study confirmed that,among Chinese,IEE didn’t increase the ADR compared with WLI,but 2G-NBI increase the ADR.
