Delayed gastric emptying(DGE) is a frequent complication after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy(PpPD).Kawai and colleagues proposed pylorus-resecting pancreatoduodenectomy(PrPD) with antecolic gastrojejunal an...Delayed gastric emptying(DGE) is a frequent complication after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy(PpPD).Kawai and colleagues proposed pylorus-resecting pancreatoduodenectomy(PrPD) with antecolic gastrojejunal anastomosis to obviate DGE occurring after PpPD.Here we debate the reported differences in the prevalence of DGE in antecolic and retrocolic gastro/duodeno-jejunostomies after PrPD and PpPD,respectively.We concluded that the route of the gastro/duodeno-jejunal anastomosis with respect to the transverse colon;i.e.,antecolic route or retrocolic route,is not responsible for the differences in prevalence of DGE after pancreatoduodenectomy(PD) and that the impact of the reconstructive method on DGE is related mostly to the angulation or torsion of the gastro/duodeno-jejunostomy.We report a prevalence of 8.9% grade A DGE and 1.1% grade C DGE in a series of 89 subtotal stomach-preserving PDs with Roux-en Y retrocolic reconstruction with anastomosis of the isolated Roux limb to the stomach and single Roux limb to both the pancreatic stump and hepatic duct.Retrocolic anastomosis of the isolated first jejunal loop to the gastric remnant allows outflow of the gastric contents by gravity through a "straight route".展开更多
In a recently published letter to the editor, we debated the proposal by Coccolini et al to treat gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) of the esophagogastric junction with enucleation and, if indicated, adjuvant th...In a recently published letter to the editor, we debated the proposal by Coccolini et al to treat gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) of the esophagogastric junction with enucleation and, if indicated, adjuvant therapy. We highlighted that, because the prognostic impact of a T1 high-mitotic rate esophageal GIST is worse than that of a T1 high-mitotic rate gastric GIST, enucleation may not be adequate surgery for esophagogastric GISTs with a high mitotic rate. In rebuttal, Coccolini et al pointed out the possible bias in assessment of the mitotic rates due to the lack of standardized methods and underlined that the site and features of the tumor need to be carefully considered in evaluation of the risk-benefit balance. Here we confirm that, apart from the problematic issue of mitotic counting, enucleation should not be indicated for GISTs at any site to reduce the risk of tumor rupture, which has been recently considered to be an unfavorable prognostic factor, and to avoid microscopic residual tumor.展开更多
The authors discussed the proposal by Coccolini and colleagues to treat gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) at the esophagogastric junction with enucleation and,if indicated,adjuvant therapy,reducing the risks rel...The authors discussed the proposal by Coccolini and colleagues to treat gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) at the esophagogastric junction with enucleation and,if indicated,adjuvant therapy,reducing the risks related to esophageal and gastroesophageal resection.They concluded that,because the prognostic impact of a T1 high-mitotic rate on esophageal GIST is worse than that of a T1 high-mitotic rate on gastric GIST,enucleation may not be an adequate surgery for esophagogastric GISTs with a high mitotic rate in which the guarantee of negative resection margins and adjuvant therapies can be the only chance of survival.展开更多
This review highlights the rationale for dissection of the 16a2 and 16b1 paraaortic area during pancreaticoduodenectomy(PD)for carcinoma of the head of the pancreas.Recent advances in surgical anatomy of the mesopancr...This review highlights the rationale for dissection of the 16a2 and 16b1 paraaortic area during pancreaticoduodenectomy(PD)for carcinoma of the head of the pancreas.Recent advances in surgical anatomy of the mesopancreas indicate that the retropancreatic area is not a single entity with well defined boundaries but an anatomical site of embryological fusion of peritoneal layers,and that continuity exists between the neuro lymphovascular adipose tissues of the retropancreaticand paraaortic areas.Recent advances in surgical pathology and oncology indicate that,in pancreatic head carcinoma,the mesopancreatic resection margin is the primary site for R1 resection,and that epithelialmesenchymal transition-related processes involved in tumor progression may impact on the prevalence of R1 resection or local recurrence rates after R0 surgery.These concepts imply that mesopancreas resection during PD for pancreatic head carcinoma should be extended to the paraaortic area in order to maximize retropancreatic clearance and minimize the likelihood of an R1 resection or the persistence of residual tumor cells after R0 resection.In PD for pancreatic head carcinoma,the rationale for dissection of the paraaortic area is to control the spread of the tumor cells along the mesopancreatic resection margin,rather than to control or stage the nodal spread.Although mesopancreatic resection cannot be considered"complete"or"en bloc",it should be"extended as far as possible"or be"maximal",including dissection of16a2 and 16b1 paraaortic areas.展开更多
A correspondence between the ＂meso＂ of the rectum and of the pancreas has recently been reported. Here we highlight the differences between mesorectum and mesopancreas. Based on anatomical findings from a series of ...A correspondence between the ＂meso＂ of the rectum and of the pancreas has recently been reported. Here we highlight the differences between mesorectum and mesopancreas. Based on anatomical findings from a series of 89 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies and 71 consecutive total mesorectal excisions, we observed that in contrast to the mesorectum, the mesopancreas did not have well-defined anatomic boundaries and was continuous and connected through its components with the para-aortic area. In rectal cancer,tumor deposits and nodal involvement could be confined to the mesorectum（i.e., within the mesorectal fascia）, whereas in pancreatic carcinoma, tumor deposits and nodal metastases occurred in the boundless mesopancreatic area. Total mesorectal excision was made en bloc with the rectum by dissecting along the mesorectal fascia; this was not the case for mesopancreatic excision since anatomical demarcation of the mesopancreas did not exist. Moreover, the growth pattern of pancreatic cancer showed greater dispersion, which was more prominent at the invasive front of the tumor and could potentially affect the status of the resection margin. These findings indicate that the mesorectum and mesopancreas are completely distinct from the pathological, surgical, and oncological standpoints.展开更多
Lymph node involvement is one of the most important prognostic indicators of carcinoma of the digestive tract.Although the therapeutic impact of lymphadenectomy has not been proven and the number of retrieved nodes ca...Lymph node involvement is one of the most important prognostic indicators of carcinoma of the digestive tract.Although the therapeutic impact of lymphadenectomy has not been proven and the number of retrieved nodes cannot be considered a measure of successful cancer surgery,an adequate lymph node count should be guaranteed to accurately assess the N-stage through the number of involved nodes,lymph node ratio,number of negative nodes,ratio of negative to positive nodes,and log odds,i.e.,the log of the ratio between the number of positive lymph nodes and the number of negative lymph nodes in digestive carcinomas.As lymphadenectomy is not without complications,sentinel node mapping has been used as the rational procedure to select patients with early digestive carcinoma in whom nodal dissection may be omitted or a more limited nodal dissection may be preferred.However,due to anatomical and technical issues,sentinel node mapping and nodal basin dissection are not yet the standard of care in early digestive cancer.Moreover,in light of the biological,prognostic and therapeutic impact of tumor budding and tumor deposits,two epithelial-mesenchymal transition-related phenomena that are involved in tumor progression,the role of staging and surgical procedures in digestive carcinomas could be redefined.展开更多
Duplication of the inferior vena cava(IVC) involves large veins on both sides of the aorta that join anteriorly at the level of the renal arteries to become the suprarenal IVC.We report CT scan and intraoperative imag...Duplication of the inferior vena cava(IVC) involves large veins on both sides of the aorta that join anteriorly at the level of the renal arteries to become the suprarenal IVC.We report CT scan and intraoperative images of a patient with duplication of the IVC who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with para-aortic lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the pancreatic head:nodal dissection along the left caval vein was not carried out.The anatomical background of the lymphatic flow to the para-aortic lymph nodes and the theoretic basis for lymph node dissection of the para-aortic area in cases of double IVC are highlighted.Lymphadenectomy along the left caval vein is not necessary in patients with double IVC who undergo pancreaticoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the pancreatic head in the absence of preoperative appearance of para-aortic disease.展开更多
Preoperative imaging staging based on tumor,node,metastasis classification cannot be effective to avoid R1 resection because only further improvements in imaging technologies will allow the precise assessment of perin...Preoperative imaging staging based on tumor,node,metastasis classification cannot be effective to avoid R1 resection because only further improvements in imaging technologies will allow the precise assessment of perineural and lymphatic invasion and the occurrence of microscopic tumour deposits in the mesopancreas.However,waiting for further improvements in imaging technologies,total mesopancreas excision remains the only tool able to precisely assess mesopancreatic resection margin status,maximize the guarantee of radicality in cases of negative(R0)mesopancreatic resection margins,and stage the mesopancreas.展开更多
Tumour rupture of gastrointestinal stromal tumours(GISTs)has been considered to be a remarkable risk factor because of its unfavourable impact on the oncological outcome.Although tumour rupture has not yet been includ...Tumour rupture of gastrointestinal stromal tumours(GISTs)has been considered to be a remarkable risk factor because of its unfavourable impact on the oncological outcome.Although tumour rupture has not yet been included in the current tumor-node-metastasis classification of GISTs as a prognostic factor,it may change the natural history of a low-risk GIST to a high-risk GIST.Originally,tumour rupture was defined as the spillage or fracture of a tumour into a body cavity,but recently,new definitions have been proposed.These definitions distinguished from the prognostic point of view between the major defects of tumour integrity,which are considered tumour rupture,and the minor defects of tumour integrity,which are not considered tumour rupture.Moreover,it has been demonstrated that the risk of disease recurrence in R1 patients is largely modulated by the presence of tumour rupture.Therefore,after excluding tumour rupture,R1 may not be an unfavourable prognostic factor for GISTs.Additionally,after the standard adjuvant treatment of imatinib for GIST with rupture,a high recurrence rate persists.This review highlights the prognostic value of tumour rupture in GISTs and emphasizes the need to carefully take into account and minimize the risk of tumour rupture when choosing surgical strategies for GISTs.展开更多
文摘Delayed gastric emptying(DGE) is a frequent complication after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy(PpPD).Kawai and colleagues proposed pylorus-resecting pancreatoduodenectomy(PrPD) with antecolic gastrojejunal anastomosis to obviate DGE occurring after PpPD.Here we debate the reported differences in the prevalence of DGE in antecolic and retrocolic gastro/duodeno-jejunostomies after PrPD and PpPD,respectively.We concluded that the route of the gastro/duodeno-jejunal anastomosis with respect to the transverse colon;i.e.,antecolic route or retrocolic route,is not responsible for the differences in prevalence of DGE after pancreatoduodenectomy(PD) and that the impact of the reconstructive method on DGE is related mostly to the angulation or torsion of the gastro/duodeno-jejunostomy.We report a prevalence of 8.9% grade A DGE and 1.1% grade C DGE in a series of 89 subtotal stomach-preserving PDs with Roux-en Y retrocolic reconstruction with anastomosis of the isolated Roux limb to the stomach and single Roux limb to both the pancreatic stump and hepatic duct.Retrocolic anastomosis of the isolated first jejunal loop to the gastric remnant allows outflow of the gastric contents by gravity through a "straight route".
文摘In a recently published letter to the editor, we debated the proposal by Coccolini et al to treat gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) of the esophagogastric junction with enucleation and, if indicated, adjuvant therapy. We highlighted that, because the prognostic impact of a T1 high-mitotic rate esophageal GIST is worse than that of a T1 high-mitotic rate gastric GIST, enucleation may not be adequate surgery for esophagogastric GISTs with a high mitotic rate. In rebuttal, Coccolini et al pointed out the possible bias in assessment of the mitotic rates due to the lack of standardized methods and underlined that the site and features of the tumor need to be carefully considered in evaluation of the risk-benefit balance. Here we confirm that, apart from the problematic issue of mitotic counting, enucleation should not be indicated for GISTs at any site to reduce the risk of tumor rupture, which has been recently considered to be an unfavorable prognostic factor, and to avoid microscopic residual tumor.
文摘The authors discussed the proposal by Coccolini and colleagues to treat gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) at the esophagogastric junction with enucleation and,if indicated,adjuvant therapy,reducing the risks related to esophageal and gastroesophageal resection.They concluded that,because the prognostic impact of a T1 high-mitotic rate on esophageal GIST is worse than that of a T1 high-mitotic rate on gastric GIST,enucleation may not be an adequate surgery for esophagogastric GISTs with a high mitotic rate in which the guarantee of negative resection margins and adjuvant therapies can be the only chance of survival.
文摘This review highlights the rationale for dissection of the 16a2 and 16b1 paraaortic area during pancreaticoduodenectomy(PD)for carcinoma of the head of the pancreas.Recent advances in surgical anatomy of the mesopancreas indicate that the retropancreatic area is not a single entity with well defined boundaries but an anatomical site of embryological fusion of peritoneal layers,and that continuity exists between the neuro lymphovascular adipose tissues of the retropancreaticand paraaortic areas.Recent advances in surgical pathology and oncology indicate that,in pancreatic head carcinoma,the mesopancreatic resection margin is the primary site for R1 resection,and that epithelialmesenchymal transition-related processes involved in tumor progression may impact on the prevalence of R1 resection or local recurrence rates after R0 surgery.These concepts imply that mesopancreas resection during PD for pancreatic head carcinoma should be extended to the paraaortic area in order to maximize retropancreatic clearance and minimize the likelihood of an R1 resection or the persistence of residual tumor cells after R0 resection.In PD for pancreatic head carcinoma,the rationale for dissection of the paraaortic area is to control the spread of the tumor cells along the mesopancreatic resection margin,rather than to control or stage the nodal spread.Although mesopancreatic resection cannot be considered"complete"or"en bloc",it should be"extended as far as possible"or be"maximal",including dissection of16a2 and 16b1 paraaortic areas.
文摘A correspondence between the ＂meso＂ of the rectum and of the pancreas has recently been reported. Here we highlight the differences between mesorectum and mesopancreas. Based on anatomical findings from a series of 89 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies and 71 consecutive total mesorectal excisions, we observed that in contrast to the mesorectum, the mesopancreas did not have well-defined anatomic boundaries and was continuous and connected through its components with the para-aortic area. In rectal cancer,tumor deposits and nodal involvement could be confined to the mesorectum（i.e., within the mesorectal fascia）, whereas in pancreatic carcinoma, tumor deposits and nodal metastases occurred in the boundless mesopancreatic area. Total mesorectal excision was made en bloc with the rectum by dissecting along the mesorectal fascia; this was not the case for mesopancreatic excision since anatomical demarcation of the mesopancreas did not exist. Moreover, the growth pattern of pancreatic cancer showed greater dispersion, which was more prominent at the invasive front of the tumor and could potentially affect the status of the resection margin. These findings indicate that the mesorectum and mesopancreas are completely distinct from the pathological, surgical, and oncological standpoints.
文摘Lymph node involvement is one of the most important prognostic indicators of carcinoma of the digestive tract.Although the therapeutic impact of lymphadenectomy has not been proven and the number of retrieved nodes cannot be considered a measure of successful cancer surgery,an adequate lymph node count should be guaranteed to accurately assess the N-stage through the number of involved nodes,lymph node ratio,number of negative nodes,ratio of negative to positive nodes,and log odds,i.e.,the log of the ratio between the number of positive lymph nodes and the number of negative lymph nodes in digestive carcinomas.As lymphadenectomy is not without complications,sentinel node mapping has been used as the rational procedure to select patients with early digestive carcinoma in whom nodal dissection may be omitted or a more limited nodal dissection may be preferred.However,due to anatomical and technical issues,sentinel node mapping and nodal basin dissection are not yet the standard of care in early digestive cancer.Moreover,in light of the biological,prognostic and therapeutic impact of tumor budding and tumor deposits,two epithelial-mesenchymal transition-related phenomena that are involved in tumor progression,the role of staging and surgical procedures in digestive carcinomas could be redefined.
文摘Duplication of the inferior vena cava(IVC) involves large veins on both sides of the aorta that join anteriorly at the level of the renal arteries to become the suprarenal IVC.We report CT scan and intraoperative images of a patient with duplication of the IVC who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with para-aortic lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the pancreatic head:nodal dissection along the left caval vein was not carried out.The anatomical background of the lymphatic flow to the para-aortic lymph nodes and the theoretic basis for lymph node dissection of the para-aortic area in cases of double IVC are highlighted.Lymphadenectomy along the left caval vein is not necessary in patients with double IVC who undergo pancreaticoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the pancreatic head in the absence of preoperative appearance of para-aortic disease.
文摘Preoperative imaging staging based on tumor,node,metastasis classification cannot be effective to avoid R1 resection because only further improvements in imaging technologies will allow the precise assessment of perineural and lymphatic invasion and the occurrence of microscopic tumour deposits in the mesopancreas.However,waiting for further improvements in imaging technologies,total mesopancreas excision remains the only tool able to precisely assess mesopancreatic resection margin status,maximize the guarantee of radicality in cases of negative(R0)mesopancreatic resection margins,and stage the mesopancreas.
文摘Tumour rupture of gastrointestinal stromal tumours(GISTs)has been considered to be a remarkable risk factor because of its unfavourable impact on the oncological outcome.Although tumour rupture has not yet been included in the current tumor-node-metastasis classification of GISTs as a prognostic factor,it may change the natural history of a low-risk GIST to a high-risk GIST.Originally,tumour rupture was defined as the spillage or fracture of a tumour into a body cavity,but recently,new definitions have been proposed.These definitions distinguished from the prognostic point of view between the major defects of tumour integrity,which are considered tumour rupture,and the minor defects of tumour integrity,which are not considered tumour rupture.Moreover,it has been demonstrated that the risk of disease recurrence in R1 patients is largely modulated by the presence of tumour rupture.Therefore,after excluding tumour rupture,R1 may not be an unfavourable prognostic factor for GISTs.Additionally,after the standard adjuvant treatment of imatinib for GIST with rupture,a high recurrence rate persists.This review highlights the prognostic value of tumour rupture in GISTs and emphasizes the need to carefully take into account and minimize the risk of tumour rupture when choosing surgical strategies for GISTs.
