Diabetic foot(DF) is a common complication of diabetes and the first cause of hospital admission in diabetic patients. In recent years several guidelines have been proposed to reinforce the the management of DF with a...Diabetic foot(DF) is a common complication of diabetes and the first cause of hospital admission in diabetic patients. In recent years several guidelines have been proposed to reinforce the the management of DF with a notable increase in diabetes knowledge and an overall reduction of amputations. Significant improvements have been reached in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers(DFUs) and nowadays clinicians have several advanced medications to apply for the best local therapy. Among these, negative pressure wound therapy(NPWT) is a useful adjunct in the management of chronic and complex wounds to promote healing and wound bed preparation for surgical procedures such as skin grafts and flap surgery. NPWT has shown remarkable results although its mechanisms of action are not completely understood. In this paper, we offer a complete overview of this medication and its implication in the clinical setting. We have examined literature related to NPWT concerning human, animal and in vitro studies, and we have summarized why, when and how we can use NPWT to treat DFUs. Further we have associated our clinical experience to scientific evidence in the field of diabetic foot to identify a defined strategy that could guide clinician in the use of NPWT approaching to DFUs.展开更多
Foot infection is a well recognized risk factor for major amputation in diabetic patients. The osteomyelitis is one of the most common expression of diabetic foot infection, being present approximately in present in 1...Foot infection is a well recognized risk factor for major amputation in diabetic patients. The osteomyelitis is one of the most common expression of diabetic foot infection, being present approximately in present in 10%-15% of moderate and in 50% of severe infectious process. An early and accurate diagnosis is required to ensure a targeted treatment and reduce the risk of major amputation. The aim of this review is to report a complete overview about the management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis. Epidemiology, clinical aspects, diagnosis and treatment are widely described according to scientific reccomendations and our experience.展开更多
Introduction: Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) are two strong risk factors for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI). Further renal insufficiency increases the risk of non healing...Introduction: Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) are two strong risk factors for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI). Further renal insufficiency increases the risk of non healing wounds and major amputation. Primary amputation rates of 22% to 44% have been reported for ischaemic foot lesion in End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) patients. In our study we evaluated the outcomes after Percutaneus Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) in diabetic patient in relation to different CKD classes. Materials and Methods: We studied a group of 456 diabetic patients with PAD complicated by foot lesion who underwent PTA because of a CLI. According to the estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR mL/min/1.73 m2) we divided the patients into five CKD groups: group 1 eGFR > 90, group 2 eGFR 90 - 60 (n = 160), group 3 eGFR 60 - 30 (n = 152), group 4 eGFR 30 -15 (n = 34) and group 5 < 15 or in ESRD) (n = 60). The following outcomes were recorded: alive without major amputation, alive with major amputation and death. The follow-up was 16.7 ± 14.3 months. Results: Alive without major amputation, alive with major amputation and death were respectively: for group 1 (77.8%, 11.1%, 11.1%), for group 2 (74.4%, 12.5%, 13.1%), for group 3 (80.3%, 11.2%, 8.5%), for group 4 (82.3%, 8.8%, 8.8%). They were 60%, 18.3%, 21.7% for group 5 significantly different from the other CKD groups (χ2 = 0.0175). Our analysis did not highlight any relationship between eGFR and outcomes and eGFR did not show any significant difference according to the different outcomes, and were respectively 60.2 ± 1.3, 61.8 ± 3.4, 63.8 ± 3.5 (P = ns). Conclusion: The outcomes were similar for groups 1-4 and therefore, according to our data, they seemed not to be influenced by the decline of GFR. Outcomes worse significantly in group 5, but this group included only patients with ESRD in dialysis treatment. Although the outcomes after PTA in group 5 was significantly worse than the other groups, still a 60% limb salvage rate was obtained with PTA also in these very fragile patients. PTA was much less aggressive than by-pass and PTA was the only method used to treat CLI in our patients. This could explain why we recorded similar outcomes in all groups despite the decline of GFR that, generally speaking, mirrors a worsening of the general clinical conditions. Worse outcomes were recorded only in group 5 and in this group dialysis by itself might be responsible of the different outcomes.展开更多
文摘Diabetic foot(DF) is a common complication of diabetes and the first cause of hospital admission in diabetic patients. In recent years several guidelines have been proposed to reinforce the the management of DF with a notable increase in diabetes knowledge and an overall reduction of amputations. Significant improvements have been reached in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers(DFUs) and nowadays clinicians have several advanced medications to apply for the best local therapy. Among these, negative pressure wound therapy(NPWT) is a useful adjunct in the management of chronic and complex wounds to promote healing and wound bed preparation for surgical procedures such as skin grafts and flap surgery. NPWT has shown remarkable results although its mechanisms of action are not completely understood. In this paper, we offer a complete overview of this medication and its implication in the clinical setting. We have examined literature related to NPWT concerning human, animal and in vitro studies, and we have summarized why, when and how we can use NPWT to treat DFUs. Further we have associated our clinical experience to scientific evidence in the field of diabetic foot to identify a defined strategy that could guide clinician in the use of NPWT approaching to DFUs.
文摘Foot infection is a well recognized risk factor for major amputation in diabetic patients. The osteomyelitis is one of the most common expression of diabetic foot infection, being present approximately in present in 10%-15% of moderate and in 50% of severe infectious process. An early and accurate diagnosis is required to ensure a targeted treatment and reduce the risk of major amputation. The aim of this review is to report a complete overview about the management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis. Epidemiology, clinical aspects, diagnosis and treatment are widely described according to scientific reccomendations and our experience.
文摘Introduction: Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) are two strong risk factors for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI). Further renal insufficiency increases the risk of non healing wounds and major amputation. Primary amputation rates of 22% to 44% have been reported for ischaemic foot lesion in End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) patients. In our study we evaluated the outcomes after Percutaneus Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) in diabetic patient in relation to different CKD classes. Materials and Methods: We studied a group of 456 diabetic patients with PAD complicated by foot lesion who underwent PTA because of a CLI. According to the estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR mL/min/1.73 m2) we divided the patients into five CKD groups: group 1 eGFR > 90, group 2 eGFR 90 - 60 (n = 160), group 3 eGFR 60 - 30 (n = 152), group 4 eGFR 30 -15 (n = 34) and group 5 < 15 or in ESRD) (n = 60). The following outcomes were recorded: alive without major amputation, alive with major amputation and death. The follow-up was 16.7 ± 14.3 months. Results: Alive without major amputation, alive with major amputation and death were respectively: for group 1 (77.8%, 11.1%, 11.1%), for group 2 (74.4%, 12.5%, 13.1%), for group 3 (80.3%, 11.2%, 8.5%), for group 4 (82.3%, 8.8%, 8.8%). They were 60%, 18.3%, 21.7% for group 5 significantly different from the other CKD groups (χ2 = 0.0175). Our analysis did not highlight any relationship between eGFR and outcomes and eGFR did not show any significant difference according to the different outcomes, and were respectively 60.2 ± 1.3, 61.8 ± 3.4, 63.8 ± 3.5 (P = ns). Conclusion: The outcomes were similar for groups 1-4 and therefore, according to our data, they seemed not to be influenced by the decline of GFR. Outcomes worse significantly in group 5, but this group included only patients with ESRD in dialysis treatment. Although the outcomes after PTA in group 5 was significantly worse than the other groups, still a 60% limb salvage rate was obtained with PTA also in these very fragile patients. PTA was much less aggressive than by-pass and PTA was the only method used to treat CLI in our patients. This could explain why we recorded similar outcomes in all groups despite the decline of GFR that, generally speaking, mirrors a worsening of the general clinical conditions. Worse outcomes were recorded only in group 5 and in this group dialysis by itself might be responsible of the different outcomes.
