The clinical course of chronic hepatitis C virus(HCV)infection is characterized by possible development of both liver and extrahepatic disorders. The tropism of HCV for the lymphoid tissue is responsible for several i...The clinical course of chronic hepatitis C virus(HCV)infection is characterized by possible development of both liver and extrahepatic disorders. The tropism of HCV for the lymphoid tissue is responsible for several immune-mediated disorders; a poly-oligoclonal B-lymphocyte expansion, commonly observed in a high proportion of patients with HCV infection, are responsible for the production of different autoantibodies and immune-complexes, such as mixed cryoglobulins. These serological alterations may characterize a variety of autoimmune or neoplastic diseases. Cryoglobulinemic vasculitis due to small-vessel deposition of circulating mixed cryoglobulins is the prototype of HCV-driven immune-mediated and lymphoproliferative disorders; interestingly, in some cases the disease may evolve to frank malignant lymphoma. In addition, HCV shows an oncogenic potential as suggested by several clinicoepidemiological and laboratory studies; in addition to hepatocellular carcinoma that represents the most frequent HCV-related malignancy, a causative role of HCV has been largely demonstrated in a significant percentage of patients with isolated B-cells nonHodgkin's lymphomas. The same virus may be also involved in the pathogenesis of papillary thyroid cancer, a rare neoplastic condition that may complicate HCVrelated thyroid involvement. Patients with HCV infection are frequently asymptomatic or may develop only hepatic alteration, while a limited but clinically relevant number can develop one or more autoimmune and/or neoplastic disorders. Given the large variability of their prevalence among patients' populations from different countries, it is possible to hypothesize a potential role of other co-factors, i.e., genetic and/or environmental, in the pathogenesis of HCV-related extra-hepatic diseases.展开更多
Hepatitis C virus （HCV） is a global health problem affecting 3% of the world＇s population （about 180 million） and a cause of both hepatic and extrahepatic diseases. B-cell lymphoproUferative disorders, whose prot...Hepatitis C virus （HCV） is a global health problem affecting 3% of the world＇s population （about 180 million） and a cause of both hepatic and extrahepatic diseases. B-cell lymphoproUferative disorders, whose prototype is mixed cryoglobulinemia, represent the most closely related as well as the most investigated HCV- related extrahepatic disorder. The association between extrahepatic （lymphoma） as well as hepatic malignancies （hepatocellular carcinoma） has justified the inclusion of HCV among human cancer viruses. HCV-associated manifestations also include porphyria cutanea tarda, lichen planus, nephropathies, thyreopathies, sicca syndrome, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, diabetes, chronic polyarthritis, sexual dysfunctions, cardiopathy/ atherosclerosis, and psychopathological disorders. A pathogenetic link between HCV virus and some lymphoproliferative disorders was confirmed by their responsiveness to antiviral therapy, which is now considered the first choice treatment. The aim of the present paper is to provide an overview of extrahepatic manifestations of HCV infection with particular attention to B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders. Available pathogenetic hypotheses and suggestions about the most appropriate, currently available, therapeutic approaches will also be discussed.展开更多
AIM To build a regional database of chronic patients to define the clinical epidemiology of hepatitis B virus(HBV)-infected patients in the Tuscan public health care system.METHODS This study used a cross-sectional co...AIM To build a regional database of chronic patients to define the clinical epidemiology of hepatitis B virus(HBV)-infected patients in the Tuscan public health care system.METHODS This study used a cross-sectional cohort design. We evaluated chronic viral hepatitis patients with HBV referred to the outpatient services of 16 hospital units. Information in the case report forms included main demographic data, blood chemistry data, viral hepatitis markers, instrumental evaluations, and eligibility for treatment or ongoing therapy and liver transplantation. RESULTS Of 4015 chronic viral hepatitis patients, 1096(27.3%) were HBV infected. The case report form was correctly completed for only 833 patients(64% males, 36% females; mean age 50.1 ± 15.4). Of these HBV-infected patients, 73% were Caucasian, 21% Asian, 4% Central African, 1% North African and 1% American. Stratifying patients by age and nationality, we found that 21.7% of HBV-infected patients were aged < 34 years(only 2.8% were Italian). The most represented routes of transmission were nosocomial/dental procedures(23%), mother-to-child(17%) and sexual transmission(12%). The most represented HBV genotypes were D(72%) and A(14%). Of the patients, 24.7% of patients were HBe Ag positive, and 75.3% were HBe Ag negative. Of the HBV patients 7% were anti-HDV positive. In the whole cohort, 26.9% were cirrhotic(35.8% aged < 45 years), and 47% were eligible for or currently undergoing treatment, of whom 41.9 % were cirrhotic. CONCLUSION Only 27.3% of chronic viral hepatitis patients were HBV infected. Our results provide evidence of HBV infection in people aged < 34 years, especially in the foreign population not protected by vaccination. In our cohort of patients, liver cirrhosis was also found in young adults.展开更多
Not only is chronic hepatitis C virus(HCV) infection a major public health problem,but also it can cause hepatocellular carcinoma and,more rarely,nonHodgkin's lymphoma.These characteristics mean that HCV is the on...Not only is chronic hepatitis C virus(HCV) infection a major public health problem,but also it can cause hepatocellular carcinoma and,more rarely,nonHodgkin's lymphoma.These characteristics mean that HCV is the only virus infecting humans that is able to cause two different cancers.The fine pathogenetic and molecular mechanisms by which HCV induces these two malignancies are not completely clear.In the last decade,it has been shown that microRNAs(miRNAs),a class of 21-23-nucleotide molecules modulating posttranscriptional gene expression,make an important contribution to the pathogenesis of several cancers and are also considered highly promising biomarkers.Here,we briefly describe the current knowledge about microRNAs' involvement in HCV-related molecular oncogenesis.We decided to focus our attention on studies fully conducted on ex vivo samples with this specific etiology,and on cultured cell lines partially or completely expressing the HCV genome.Some of the results reported in this review are controversial,possibly because of methodological issues,differences in sampling size and features,and ethnicity of patients.What is certain is that miRNAs play a remarkable role in regulating gene expression during oncogenetic processes and in viral infection.A clear understanding of their effects is fundamental to elucidating the mechanisms underlying virus-induced malignancies.展开更多
AIM: To evaluate daclatasvir vs telaprevir, each combined with peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin(peg IFN/RBV), in treatment-naive hepatitis C virus(HCV) genotype(GT) 1-infected patients.METHODS: In this phase 3, randomi...AIM: To evaluate daclatasvir vs telaprevir, each combined with peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin(peg IFN/RBV), in treatment-naive hepatitis C virus(HCV) genotype(GT) 1-infected patients.METHODS: In this phase 3, randomized, open-label, noninferiority study, 602 patients were randomly assigned(2:1) to daclatasvir vs telaprevir, stratified by IL28 B rs12979860 host genotype(CC vs non-CC), cirrhosis status(compensated cirrhosis vs no cirrhosis), and HCV GT1 subtype(GT1a vs GT1b). Patients were selected by study inclusion criteria from a total of 793 enrolled patients. Patients received daclatasvir 60 mg once daily or telaprevir 750 mg 3 times daily plus peg IFN/RBV. Daclatasvir recipients received 24 wk of daclatasvir plus peg IFN/RBV; those without an extended rapid virologic response(e RVR; undetectable HCV-RNA at weeks 4 and 12) received an additional 24 wk of peg IFN/RBV. Telaprevir-treated patients received 12 wk of telaprevir plus peg IFN/RBV followed by 12(with e RVR) or 36(no e RVR) wk of peg IFN/RBV. The primary objective was to compare for noninferiority of sustained virologic response rates at posttreatment week 12(SVR12) in GT1b-infected patients. Key secondary objectives were to demonstrate that the rates of anemia(hemoglobin < 10 g/d L) and rashrelated events, through week 12, were lower with daclatasvir + peg IFN/RBV than with telaprevir + peg IFN/RBV among GT1b-infected patients. Resistance testing was performed using population-based sequencing of the NS5 A region for all patients at baseline, and for patients with virologic failure or relapse and HCV-RNA ≥ 1000 IU/m L, to investigate any link between NS5 A polymorphisms associated with daclatasvir resistance and virologic outcome. RESULTS: Patient demographics and disease characteristics were generally balanced across treatment arms; however, there was a higher proportion of black/African Americans in the daclatasvir groups(6.0% and 8.2% in the GT1 b and GT1 a groups, respectively) than in the telaprevir groups(2.2% and 3.0%). Among GT1 binfected patients, daclatasvir plus peg IFN/RBV was noninferior to telaprevir plus peg IFN/RBV for SVR12 [85%(228/268) vs 81%(109/134); difference, 4.3%(95%CI:-3.3% to 11.9%)]. Anemia(hemoglobin < 10 g/d L) was significantly less frequent with daclatasvir than with telaprevir [difference,-29.1%(95%CI:-38.8% to-19.4%)]. Rash-related events were also less common with daclatasvir than with telaprevir, but the difference was not statistically significant. In GT1 ainfected patients, SVR12 was 64.9% with daclatasvir and 69.7% with telaprevir. Among both daclatasvir and telaprevir treatment groups, across GT1b- or GT1a-infected patients, lower response rates were observed in patients with IL28 B non-CC and cirrhosis- factors known to affect response to peg IFN/RBV. Consistent with these observations, a multivariate logistic regression analysis in GT1b-infected patients d e m o n s t ra t e d t h a t S V R 1 2 wa s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h IL28 B host genotype(CC vs non-CC, P = 0.011) and cirrhosis status(absent vs present, P = 0.031). NS5 A polymorphisms associated with daclatasvir resistance(at L28, R30, L31, or Y93) were observed in 17.3% of GT1b-infected patients at baseline; such variants did not appear to be absolute predictors of failure since 72.1% of these patients achieved SVR12 compared with 86.9% without these polymorphisms. Among GT1b-infected patients, treatment was completed by 85.4%(229/268) in the daclatasvir group, and by 85.1%(114/134) in the telaprevir group, and among GT1a-infected patients, by 67.2%(90/134) and 69.7%(46/66), respectively. Discontinuations(of all 3 agents) due to an AE were more frequent with telaprevir than with daclatasvir, whereas discontinuations due to lack of efficacy were more frequent with daclatasvir, due, in part, to differences in futility criteria. CONCLUSION: Daclatasvir plus peg IFN/RBV demonstrated noninferiority to telaprevir plus peg IFN/RBV for SVR12 and was well-tolerated in treatment-naive GT1 binfected patients, supporting the use of daclatasvir with other direct-acting antivirals.展开更多
Mixed cryoglobulinemia(MC)is the extrahepatic manifestation most strictly correlated with hepatitis C virus(HCV)infection;it is a benign autoimmune and lymphoproliferative disorder that evolves to lymphoma in5%-10%of ...Mixed cryoglobulinemia(MC)is the extrahepatic manifestation most strictly correlated with hepatitis C virus(HCV)infection;it is a benign autoimmune and lymphoproliferative disorder that evolves to lymphoma in5%-10%of cases.MC is reputed to be a multistep and multifactorial process whose pathogenicity is still poorly understood.It is still unknown why only some chronically infected HCV patients develop MC and only some of these exhibit systemic symptoms(MC syndrome).Several studies have investigated the pathogenetic basis of MC and the most recent ones suggest that the virus is able to trigger such a disorder only in the presence of genetic factors that are still unknown.Here,we try to clarify the complex relationship between HCVrelated MC and the host’s genetic background.The data that we report are heterogeneous and sometimes even conflicting.Therefore,large,multicenter studies are clearly needed.The identification of a characteristic genetic signature of cryoglobulinemic patients would be an important step toward a personalized approach in their clinical care.The new wide-ranging genomics technologies will hopefully help to resolve these complex issues.展开更多
AIM:To evaluate the association between liver stiffness(LS) prior to the initiation of dual/triple therapy and viral response.METHODS:LS was measured in all patients before treatment was administered.The therapeutic a...AIM:To evaluate the association between liver stiffness(LS) prior to the initiation of dual/triple therapy and viral response.METHODS:LS was measured in all patients before treatment was administered.The therapeutic approach was based on hepatic,virological,and immunological evaluations and considered the fact that patients with severe fibrosis(F3)or compensated cirrhosis(F4)in Child-Pugh class A are the primary candidates for triple therapy.In total,65 hepatitis C virus(HCV)patients were treated with Peg-interferon/ribavirin(Peg-IFN/RBV);24patients were classified as genotypes 1/4(36.92%),and41 patients were classified as genotypes 2/3(63.08%)(dual therapy).In addition,20 HCV treatment-experienced genotype 1 patients were treated with Peg IFN-RBV and boceprevir(triple therapy).Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare the groups.RESULTS:LS significantly differed between dual therapy and triple therapy(P=0.002).The mean LS value before dual therapy treatment was 8.61±5.79k Pa and was significantly different between patients achieving a sustained virologic response(SVR)24weeks after therapy and those who did not(7.23±5.18 k Pa vs 11.72±5.99 k Pa,respectively,P=0.0003).The relative risk of non-response to therapy was 4.45(95%CI:2.32-8.55).The attributable risk of non-response to therapy was 49%.The mean LSvalue before triple therapy treatment was 13.29±8.57k Pa and was significantly different between patients achieving and not achieving SVR24(9.41±5.05 vs19.11±9.74,respectively;P=0.008).The relative risk of non-response to therapy was 5.57%(95%CI:1.50-20.65).The attributable risk of non-response to therapy(70%)was increased compared with dual therapy patients.Pre-treatment stiffness>12 k Pa was significantly associated with non-SVR(P<0.025)in both groups.CONCLUSION:Pre-treatment liver stiffness may be useful for predicting the response to treatment in patients treated with either dual or triple anti-HCV therapy.展开更多
文摘The clinical course of chronic hepatitis C virus(HCV)infection is characterized by possible development of both liver and extrahepatic disorders. The tropism of HCV for the lymphoid tissue is responsible for several immune-mediated disorders; a poly-oligoclonal B-lymphocyte expansion, commonly observed in a high proportion of patients with HCV infection, are responsible for the production of different autoantibodies and immune-complexes, such as mixed cryoglobulins. These serological alterations may characterize a variety of autoimmune or neoplastic diseases. Cryoglobulinemic vasculitis due to small-vessel deposition of circulating mixed cryoglobulins is the prototype of HCV-driven immune-mediated and lymphoproliferative disorders; interestingly, in some cases the disease may evolve to frank malignant lymphoma. In addition, HCV shows an oncogenic potential as suggested by several clinicoepidemiological and laboratory studies; in addition to hepatocellular carcinoma that represents the most frequent HCV-related malignancy, a causative role of HCV has been largely demonstrated in a significant percentage of patients with isolated B-cells nonHodgkin's lymphomas. The same virus may be also involved in the pathogenesis of papillary thyroid cancer, a rare neoplastic condition that may complicate HCVrelated thyroid involvement. Patients with HCV infection are frequently asymptomatic or may develop only hepatic alteration, while a limited but clinically relevant number can develop one or more autoimmune and/or neoplastic disorders. Given the large variability of their prevalence among patients' populations from different countries, it is possible to hypothesize a potential role of other co-factors, i.e., genetic and/or environmental, in the pathogenesis of HCV-related extra-hepatic diseases.
文摘Hepatitis C virus （HCV） is a global health problem affecting 3% of the world＇s population （about 180 million） and a cause of both hepatic and extrahepatic diseases. B-cell lymphoproUferative disorders, whose prototype is mixed cryoglobulinemia, represent the most closely related as well as the most investigated HCV- related extrahepatic disorder. The association between extrahepatic （lymphoma） as well as hepatic malignancies （hepatocellular carcinoma） has justified the inclusion of HCV among human cancer viruses. HCV-associated manifestations also include porphyria cutanea tarda, lichen planus, nephropathies, thyreopathies, sicca syndrome, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, diabetes, chronic polyarthritis, sexual dysfunctions, cardiopathy/ atherosclerosis, and psychopathological disorders. A pathogenetic link between HCV virus and some lymphoproliferative disorders was confirmed by their responsiveness to antiviral therapy, which is now considered the first choice treatment. The aim of the present paper is to provide an overview of extrahepatic manifestations of HCV infection with particular attention to B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders. Available pathogenetic hypotheses and suggestions about the most appropriate, currently available, therapeutic approaches will also be discussed.
文摘AIM To build a regional database of chronic patients to define the clinical epidemiology of hepatitis B virus(HBV)-infected patients in the Tuscan public health care system.METHODS This study used a cross-sectional cohort design. We evaluated chronic viral hepatitis patients with HBV referred to the outpatient services of 16 hospital units. Information in the case report forms included main demographic data, blood chemistry data, viral hepatitis markers, instrumental evaluations, and eligibility for treatment or ongoing therapy and liver transplantation. RESULTS Of 4015 chronic viral hepatitis patients, 1096(27.3%) were HBV infected. The case report form was correctly completed for only 833 patients(64% males, 36% females; mean age 50.1 ± 15.4). Of these HBV-infected patients, 73% were Caucasian, 21% Asian, 4% Central African, 1% North African and 1% American. Stratifying patients by age and nationality, we found that 21.7% of HBV-infected patients were aged < 34 years(only 2.8% were Italian). The most represented routes of transmission were nosocomial/dental procedures(23%), mother-to-child(17%) and sexual transmission(12%). The most represented HBV genotypes were D(72%) and A(14%). Of the patients, 24.7% of patients were HBe Ag positive, and 75.3% were HBe Ag negative. Of the HBV patients 7% were anti-HDV positive. In the whole cohort, 26.9% were cirrhotic(35.8% aged < 45 years), and 47% were eligible for or currently undergoing treatment, of whom 41.9 % were cirrhotic. CONCLUSION Only 27.3% of chronic viral hepatitis patients were HBV infected. Our results provide evidence of HBV infection in people aged < 34 years, especially in the foreign population not protected by vaccination. In our cohort of patients, liver cirrhosis was also found in young adults.
基金Supported by Grants from 2015 Post-Doc fellowship "Fondazione Umberto Veronesi"(to Gragnani L)2015 AIRC fellowship(to Fognani E)FIRE(to Piluso A)
文摘Not only is chronic hepatitis C virus(HCV) infection a major public health problem,but also it can cause hepatocellular carcinoma and,more rarely,nonHodgkin's lymphoma.These characteristics mean that HCV is the only virus infecting humans that is able to cause two different cancers.The fine pathogenetic and molecular mechanisms by which HCV induces these two malignancies are not completely clear.In the last decade,it has been shown that microRNAs(miRNAs),a class of 21-23-nucleotide molecules modulating posttranscriptional gene expression,make an important contribution to the pathogenesis of several cancers and are also considered highly promising biomarkers.Here,we briefly describe the current knowledge about microRNAs' involvement in HCV-related molecular oncogenesis.We decided to focus our attention on studies fully conducted on ex vivo samples with this specific etiology,and on cultured cell lines partially or completely expressing the HCV genome.Some of the results reported in this review are controversial,possibly because of methodological issues,differences in sampling size and features,and ethnicity of patients.What is certain is that miRNAs play a remarkable role in regulating gene expression during oncogenetic processes and in viral infection.A clear understanding of their effects is fundamental to elucidating the mechanisms underlying virus-induced malignancies.
文摘AIM: To evaluate daclatasvir vs telaprevir, each combined with peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin(peg IFN/RBV), in treatment-naive hepatitis C virus(HCV) genotype(GT) 1-infected patients.METHODS: In this phase 3, randomized, open-label, noninferiority study, 602 patients were randomly assigned(2:1) to daclatasvir vs telaprevir, stratified by IL28 B rs12979860 host genotype(CC vs non-CC), cirrhosis status(compensated cirrhosis vs no cirrhosis), and HCV GT1 subtype(GT1a vs GT1b). Patients were selected by study inclusion criteria from a total of 793 enrolled patients. Patients received daclatasvir 60 mg once daily or telaprevir 750 mg 3 times daily plus peg IFN/RBV. Daclatasvir recipients received 24 wk of daclatasvir plus peg IFN/RBV; those without an extended rapid virologic response(e RVR; undetectable HCV-RNA at weeks 4 and 12) received an additional 24 wk of peg IFN/RBV. Telaprevir-treated patients received 12 wk of telaprevir plus peg IFN/RBV followed by 12(with e RVR) or 36(no e RVR) wk of peg IFN/RBV. The primary objective was to compare for noninferiority of sustained virologic response rates at posttreatment week 12(SVR12) in GT1b-infected patients. Key secondary objectives were to demonstrate that the rates of anemia(hemoglobin < 10 g/d L) and rashrelated events, through week 12, were lower with daclatasvir + peg IFN/RBV than with telaprevir + peg IFN/RBV among GT1b-infected patients. Resistance testing was performed using population-based sequencing of the NS5 A region for all patients at baseline, and for patients with virologic failure or relapse and HCV-RNA ≥ 1000 IU/m L, to investigate any link between NS5 A polymorphisms associated with daclatasvir resistance and virologic outcome. RESULTS: Patient demographics and disease characteristics were generally balanced across treatment arms; however, there was a higher proportion of black/African Americans in the daclatasvir groups(6.0% and 8.2% in the GT1 b and GT1 a groups, respectively) than in the telaprevir groups(2.2% and 3.0%). Among GT1 binfected patients, daclatasvir plus peg IFN/RBV was noninferior to telaprevir plus peg IFN/RBV for SVR12 [85%(228/268) vs 81%(109/134); difference, 4.3%(95%CI:-3.3% to 11.9%)]. Anemia(hemoglobin < 10 g/d L) was significantly less frequent with daclatasvir than with telaprevir [difference,-29.1%(95%CI:-38.8% to-19.4%)]. Rash-related events were also less common with daclatasvir than with telaprevir, but the difference was not statistically significant. In GT1 ainfected patients, SVR12 was 64.9% with daclatasvir and 69.7% with telaprevir. Among both daclatasvir and telaprevir treatment groups, across GT1b- or GT1a-infected patients, lower response rates were observed in patients with IL28 B non-CC and cirrhosis- factors known to affect response to peg IFN/RBV. Consistent with these observations, a multivariate logistic regression analysis in GT1b-infected patients d e m o n s t ra t e d t h a t S V R 1 2 wa s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h IL28 B host genotype(CC vs non-CC, P = 0.011) and cirrhosis status(absent vs present, P = 0.031). NS5 A polymorphisms associated with daclatasvir resistance(at L28, R30, L31, or Y93) were observed in 17.3% of GT1b-infected patients at baseline; such variants did not appear to be absolute predictors of failure since 72.1% of these patients achieved SVR12 compared with 86.9% without these polymorphisms. Among GT1b-infected patients, treatment was completed by 85.4%(229/268) in the daclatasvir group, and by 85.1%(114/134) in the telaprevir group, and among GT1a-infected patients, by 67.2%(90/134) and 69.7%(46/66), respectively. Discontinuations(of all 3 agents) due to an AE were more frequent with telaprevir than with daclatasvir, whereas discontinuations due to lack of efficacy were more frequent with daclatasvir, due, in part, to differences in futility criteria. CONCLUSION: Daclatasvir plus peg IFN/RBV demonstrated noninferiority to telaprevir plus peg IFN/RBV for SVR12 and was well-tolerated in treatment-naive GT1 binfected patients, supporting the use of daclatasvir with other direct-acting antivirals.
基金Supported by Grants from the"Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro"Investigator Grant,No.1461‘‘Istituto Toscano Tumori’’+1 种基金"Fondazione Istituto di Ricerche Virologiche Oretta Bartolomei Corsi""Ente Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze"
文摘Mixed cryoglobulinemia(MC)is the extrahepatic manifestation most strictly correlated with hepatitis C virus(HCV)infection;it is a benign autoimmune and lymphoproliferative disorder that evolves to lymphoma in5%-10%of cases.MC is reputed to be a multistep and multifactorial process whose pathogenicity is still poorly understood.It is still unknown why only some chronically infected HCV patients develop MC and only some of these exhibit systemic symptoms(MC syndrome).Several studies have investigated the pathogenetic basis of MC and the most recent ones suggest that the virus is able to trigger such a disorder only in the presence of genetic factors that are still unknown.Here,we try to clarify the complex relationship between HCVrelated MC and the host’s genetic background.The data that we report are heterogeneous and sometimes even conflicting.Therefore,large,multicenter studies are clearly needed.The identification of a characteristic genetic signature of cryoglobulinemic patients would be an important step toward a personalized approach in their clinical care.The new wide-ranging genomics technologies will hopefully help to resolve these complex issues.
文摘AIM:To evaluate the association between liver stiffness(LS) prior to the initiation of dual/triple therapy and viral response.METHODS:LS was measured in all patients before treatment was administered.The therapeutic approach was based on hepatic,virological,and immunological evaluations and considered the fact that patients with severe fibrosis(F3)or compensated cirrhosis(F4)in Child-Pugh class A are the primary candidates for triple therapy.In total,65 hepatitis C virus(HCV)patients were treated with Peg-interferon/ribavirin(Peg-IFN/RBV);24patients were classified as genotypes 1/4(36.92%),and41 patients were classified as genotypes 2/3(63.08%)(dual therapy).In addition,20 HCV treatment-experienced genotype 1 patients were treated with Peg IFN-RBV and boceprevir(triple therapy).Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare the groups.RESULTS:LS significantly differed between dual therapy and triple therapy(P=0.002).The mean LS value before dual therapy treatment was 8.61±5.79k Pa and was significantly different between patients achieving a sustained virologic response(SVR)24weeks after therapy and those who did not(7.23±5.18 k Pa vs 11.72±5.99 k Pa,respectively,P=0.0003).The relative risk of non-response to therapy was 4.45(95%CI:2.32-8.55).The attributable risk of non-response to therapy was 49%.The mean LSvalue before triple therapy treatment was 13.29±8.57k Pa and was significantly different between patients achieving and not achieving SVR24(9.41±5.05 vs19.11±9.74,respectively;P=0.008).The relative risk of non-response to therapy was 5.57%(95%CI:1.50-20.65).The attributable risk of non-response to therapy(70%)was increased compared with dual therapy patients.Pre-treatment stiffness>12 k Pa was significantly associated with non-SVR(P<0.025)in both groups.CONCLUSION:Pre-treatment liver stiffness may be useful for predicting the response to treatment in patients treated with either dual or triple anti-HCV therapy.
