The occurrence of coal-bearing strata in a variety of coal-bearing basins of China is characterized by late tectonic deformation and remarkable spatial and geochronologic differences.The main controlling factors,which...The occurrence of coal-bearing strata in a variety of coal-bearing basins of China is characterized by late tectonic deformation and remarkable spatial and geochronologic differences.The main controlling factors,which determine the tectonic framework of coalfields,include the geodynamic environment,tectonic evolution,deep structures,tectonic stress,and lithologic combination of the coal measures.The Chinese continent has experienced multi-stage tectonic movements since the Late Paleozoic.The spatial and temporal heterogeneity of its continental tectonic evolution,the complexity of its basement properties,and its stratigraphic configurations control the tectonic framework of its coalfields’present complex and orderly patterns.The concept of coal occurrence structural units is proposed in this paper and is defined as the structural zoning of coal occurrence.China’s coalfields are divided into five coal occurrence structural areas,and the structural characteristics of the coalfields in five main coal occurrence areas throughout the country are summarized.Based on the analysis of the relationship between the structure characteristics and occurrence of coal in these coalfields,the coal-controlling structures are divided into six groups:extensional structural styles,compressional structural styles,shearing and rotational structural styles,inverted structural styles,sliding structural styles,and syn-depositional structural styles.In addition,the distribution of coal-controlling structural styles is briefly summarized in this paper.展开更多
Natural resource-management studies have become increasingly attentive to the influences of human factors. Among these,cultural biases shape people’s responses to changes in natural resource systems. Several studies ...Natural resource-management studies have become increasingly attentive to the influences of human factors. Among these,cultural biases shape people’s responses to changes in natural resource systems. Several studies have applied grid-group cultural theory to assess the effects of multiple value biases among stakeholders on natural resource management. We developed and administered a questionnaire in the Heihe River Basin(n = 364) in northwestern China to investigate the appropriateness of applying this theory in the Chinese context of natural resource management. The results revealed various cultural biases among the respondents. In descending order of prevalence, these biases were hierarchism(46.98%), individualism(26.65%), egalitarianism(18.96%), and fatalism(2.78%), with the remaining respondents(4.67%) evidencing no obvious bias. Our empirical study revealed respondents’ worldviews and the influence of sociodemographic characteristics on cultural biases, as theoretically posited. Among the variables examined, age had a positive and significant effect across all biases except individualism. The correlation of income to all cultural biases was consistently negative. Only education had a negative and significant effect across all biases. Women were found to adhere to egalitarianism, whereas men adhered to individualism and hierarchism. Thus, grid-group cultural theory was found to be appropriate in the Chinese context, with gender, age, education, and income evidently accounting for cultural biases. Relationships between environmental attitudes and cultural biases conformed with the hypothesis advanced by grid-group cultural theory. This finding may be of value in explaining individuals’ environmental attitudes and facilitating the development and implementation of natural resource-management policies.展开更多
Correction to:Int J Coal Sci Technol https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-020-00326-z The original publication of the article contains incorrect notes in Fig.1.The correct version of notes in Fig.1 is provided in this errat...Correction to:Int J Coal Sci Technol https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-020-00326-z The original publication of the article contains incorrect notes in Fig.1.The correct version of notes in Fig.1 is provided in this erratum.Fig.1 Tectonic framework of coalfields in China.1—Paleogene–Neogene coal measure;2—Lower Cretaceous coal measure;3—Early-Middle Jurassic coal measure;4—Upper Triassic coal measure;5—Carboniferous–Permian coal measure;6—First-level structural boundary;7—Second-level structural boundary;I:Eastern compound deformation zone;II:Western compressional deformation zone;III:Middle transitional deformation zone;NECCA:North East China coal occurrence area;NCCA:North China coal occurrence area;NWCCA:Northwest China coal occurrence Area;SCCA:South China coal occurrence area;YXCA:Yunnan-Tibet(Xizang)China coal occurrence area.展开更多
基金This study was financially supported by the Geological Survey Project of China Geological Survey National Potential Evaluation of Coal Resources project(121211121043)the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41572141,41772156).
文摘The occurrence of coal-bearing strata in a variety of coal-bearing basins of China is characterized by late tectonic deformation and remarkable spatial and geochronologic differences.The main controlling factors,which determine the tectonic framework of coalfields,include the geodynamic environment,tectonic evolution,deep structures,tectonic stress,and lithologic combination of the coal measures.The Chinese continent has experienced multi-stage tectonic movements since the Late Paleozoic.The spatial and temporal heterogeneity of its continental tectonic evolution,the complexity of its basement properties,and its stratigraphic configurations control the tectonic framework of its coalfields’present complex and orderly patterns.The concept of coal occurrence structural units is proposed in this paper and is defined as the structural zoning of coal occurrence.China’s coalfields are divided into five coal occurrence structural areas,and the structural characteristics of the coalfields in five main coal occurrence areas throughout the country are summarized.Based on the analysis of the relationship between the structure characteristics and occurrence of coal in these coalfields,the coal-controlling structures are divided into six groups:extensional structural styles,compressional structural styles,shearing and rotational structural styles,inverted structural styles,sliding structural styles,and syn-depositional structural styles.In addition,the distribution of coal-controlling structural styles is briefly summarized in this paper.
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (41571516)the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(XDA19040500 , XDA19070502, XDA2010010402)Gansu Province Social Science Planning Project (YB063)
文摘Natural resource-management studies have become increasingly attentive to the influences of human factors. Among these,cultural biases shape people’s responses to changes in natural resource systems. Several studies have applied grid-group cultural theory to assess the effects of multiple value biases among stakeholders on natural resource management. We developed and administered a questionnaire in the Heihe River Basin(n = 364) in northwestern China to investigate the appropriateness of applying this theory in the Chinese context of natural resource management. The results revealed various cultural biases among the respondents. In descending order of prevalence, these biases were hierarchism(46.98%), individualism(26.65%), egalitarianism(18.96%), and fatalism(2.78%), with the remaining respondents(4.67%) evidencing no obvious bias. Our empirical study revealed respondents’ worldviews and the influence of sociodemographic characteristics on cultural biases, as theoretically posited. Among the variables examined, age had a positive and significant effect across all biases except individualism. The correlation of income to all cultural biases was consistently negative. Only education had a negative and significant effect across all biases. Women were found to adhere to egalitarianism, whereas men adhered to individualism and hierarchism. Thus, grid-group cultural theory was found to be appropriate in the Chinese context, with gender, age, education, and income evidently accounting for cultural biases. Relationships between environmental attitudes and cultural biases conformed with the hypothesis advanced by grid-group cultural theory. This finding may be of value in explaining individuals’ environmental attitudes and facilitating the development and implementation of natural resource-management policies.
文摘Correction to:Int J Coal Sci Technol https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-020-00326-z The original publication of the article contains incorrect notes in Fig.1.The correct version of notes in Fig.1 is provided in this erratum.Fig.1 Tectonic framework of coalfields in China.1—Paleogene–Neogene coal measure;2—Lower Cretaceous coal measure;3—Early-Middle Jurassic coal measure;4—Upper Triassic coal measure;5—Carboniferous–Permian coal measure;6—First-level structural boundary;7—Second-level structural boundary;I:Eastern compound deformation zone;II:Western compressional deformation zone;III:Middle transitional deformation zone;NECCA:North East China coal occurrence area;NCCA:North China coal occurrence area;NWCCA:Northwest China coal occurrence Area;SCCA:South China coal occurrence area;YXCA:Yunnan-Tibet(Xizang)China coal occurrence area.
