摘要
穿透式审判思维在金融司法领域的广泛运用并非纯粹的法律适用问题,而是源自我国政法传统的塑造与金融法适应性提升的必然结果,反映出法院寻求金融治理功能的客观需要。在实践中,穿透式金融审判以“通谋虚伪表示”与“公序良俗转介”为主要实施方式,不仅表征我国法院的角色由金融纠纷的裁判者拓展到金融风险的治理者的转变,同时也昭示着穿透式审判思维业已实现从审判理念到司法规制工具的转型。为抑制穿透式金融审判所可能引发的风险,应从维护法秩序与实现规制效能的双重视角对其予以完善,划定穿透式审判在金融司法中的运用边界,确保司法治理金融市场功能的更好实现。
The widespread application of penetrating judicial thinking in the field of financial judiciary is not a pure legal application issue,but an inevitable result of the shaping of China's political and legal traditions and the improvement of the adaptability of financial law,reflecting the need of courts to seek financial governance functions.In practice,the main implementation methods of penetrating financial trial are“false expression on intent”and“public order and good customs clauses”.This not only represents the transformation of the role of Chinese courts from the arbitrators of financial disputes to the governors of financial risks,but also indicates the transformation of penetrating trial thinking from trial concepts to judicial regulatory tools.In order to curb the risks that may be caused by penetrating financial trial,it should be improved from the dual perspectives of maintaining legal order and enhancing regulatory effectiveness,defining the boundaries of the application of penetrating trial in financial judiciary,and ensuring the better realization of the judicial governance function of the financial market.
作者
鲁篱
庄鸿钦
Lu Li;Zhuang Hongqin(School of Law,Southwestern University of Finance and Economics,Chengdu,Sichuan,China)
出处
《四川师范大学学报(社会科学版)》
2025年第1期55-63,201,共10页
Journal of Sichuan Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
穿透式审判
金融司法
金融治理
公序良俗
penetrating trial
financial judicature
financial governance
public order and good customs
