期刊文献+

慢性伤口门诊处理中的风险管理及个体化护理分析 被引量:6

Risk Management and Individual Nursing in the Treatment of Chronic Wound
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨慢性伤口门诊处理中的风险管理及个体化护理方法。方法选取2013年11月—2015年5月在该院接受慢性伤口治疗的患者94例,随机分为两组。对照组47例患者给予常规护理,观察组47例患者给予个体化护理,比较两组护理效果。结果治疗后,对照组中对护理非常满意有26例,满意有11例,不满意有10例,总满意率为78.72%;观察组中对护理非常满意有34例,满意有9例,不满意有4例,总满意率为91.49%。对照组的总满意率明显低于观察组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对照组中医疗纠纷有8例(17.02%),观察组中医疗纠纷有3例(6.38%)。观察组的医疗纠纷发生率为6.38%,明显低于对照组的17.02%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组并发症发生率为19.15%,低于对照组的46.81%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在慢性伤口的护理中,做好风险管理并采用个体化护理方法,可提高患者护理的满意率,减少医疗纠纷。 Objective To explore the clinic treatment of chronic wounds in risk management and individualized nursing methods. Methods 94 cases of patients from November 2013 to May 2015 to accept the treatment of chronic wounds in our hospital, were randomly divided into two groups. The control group 47 patients were given conventional nursing, the observation group 47 patients were given individualized nursing, nursing effect the two groups were compared. Results after treatment, the control group of nursing satisfaction is 26 cases, with 11 cases, with 10 cases, the total satisfaction rate was78.72%; in the observation group on nursing satisfaction was 34 cases, 9 cases were satisfied, not satisfied with 4 cases, the total satisfaction rate of total satisfaction the 91.49%. group was significantly lower than the observation group, the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). The control group had 8 cases of medical disputes(17.02%), the observation group in medical disputes in 3 cases(6.38%). The observation group the incidence of medical disputes was6.38%, significantly lower than the control group 17.02%, the difference There was significant difference(P〈0.05).Observation group, the complication rate for 19.15%, lower than the 46.81% in the control group, the difference is statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusion in chronic wound care, good risk management and the use of individualized nursing method, improve patient care satisfaction rate, reduce medical disputes.
出处 《中国卫生产业》 2016年第5期166-168,共3页 China Health Industry
关键词 慢性伤口 个体化护理 风险管理 满意率 Chronic wound Individualized nursing Risk management Satisfaction rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献85

  • 1田二荣.急诊科伤口风险管理对策的实施效果分析[J].内蒙古医科大学学报,2013,35(S2):671-673. 被引量:2
  • 2高延秀,王明俊.门诊手术与感染相关因素及对策[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2007,17(2):220-220. 被引量:4
  • 3Elster M, Grothier I. Developing a clinical risk management strategy[J]. J Wound Care, 2004, 13(10):430.
  • 4Bentley J, Bishai P, Foster A, et al. Clini- cal competence in sharp debridement: an innovative course[J]. Br Community Nurs, 2005, 10(3):S6-13.
  • 5Brown G. Wound documentation: Mana- ging risk [J]. Adv Skin Wound Care, 2006, 19(3): 155-165.
  • 6Wolcott RD,Kennedy JP,Dowd SE. Regular debridement is the main tool for maintaining a healthy wound bed in most chronic[J].J Wound Care,2009,18(2):54-56.
  • 7Kim PJ,Steinberg JS. Wound care:biofilm and its impact on the latest treatment modalities for ulcerations of the diabetic foot[J]. Semin Vasc Surg,2012,25(2):70-74.
  • 8Caputo WJ,Beggs DJ,DeFede JL,et al. A prospective rando- raised controlled clinical trial comparing hydrosurgcry de- bridement with conventional surgical debridement in lower ex- tremity ulcers[J]. Int Wound J,2008,5(2):288-294.
  • 9Bradley BH,Cunningham M. Biofihns in chronic wounds and the potential role of negative pressure wound therapy [J].J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs,2013,40(2):143-149.
  • 10Gabriel A,Shores J,Heinrich C,et al. Negative pressure wound therapy with instillation:a pilot study describing a new method for treating infected wounds[J]. Int Wound J,2008,5(3): 399-413.

共引文献147

同被引文献66

引证文献6

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部